Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lebensqualität nach dem Prostatakarzinom

Bedeutung von Kommunikation und psychoonkologischen Hilfen

  • Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Lebensqualität nach dem Prostatakarzinom
  • Published:
Uro-News Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Robert-Koch-Institut, Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, 2018; https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Krebsarten/Prostatakrebs/prostatakrebs.html; abgerufen am 7.1.2020

  2. Reeve BB et al. Impact of cancer on health-related quality of life of older Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 860-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dahl AA et al. Quality of life in survivors of testicular cancer. Urol Oncol. 2005; 23: 193-200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prabhu V et al. Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Rev Urol. 2013; 15: 161-77

  5. Lardas M et al. Quality of life outcomes after primary treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 869-85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chambers SK et al. Trajectories of quality of life, life satisfaction, and psychological adjustment after prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2017; 26: 1576-85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloch S et al. Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Biopsychosoc Med. 2007; 1: 2

  8. Chambers SK et al. Intervening to improve psychological outcomes for men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2013; 22: 1025-34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein RM et al. in: Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007

  10. Bundesgesundheitsministerium. Nationaler Krebsplan. 2008; https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/N/Nationaler_Krebsplan/Nationaler_Krebsplan-Zieluebersicht.pdf; abgerufen am 7.1.2020

  11. Sinfield P et al. Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review. Health Expect. 2009; 12: 301-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wittmann D et al. Patient preoperative expectations of urinary, bowel, hormonal and sexual functioning do not match actual outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2011; 186: 494-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steginga SK et al. Prospective study of men's psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2004; 63: 751-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Diefenbach MA et al. Regret of treatment decision and its association with disease-specific quality of life following prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Invest. 2007; 25: 449-57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stalmeier PF et al. Doctors' and patients' preferences for participation and treatment in curative prostate cancer radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3096-100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tariman JD et al. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21: 1145-51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elwyn G et al. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017; 359: j4891

  18. Ernstmann N et al. (2019). Prostate-specific health-related quality of life and patient-physician communication - a 3.5-year follow-up. Patient Educ Couns. 2019; 102: 2114-21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martínez-González NA et al. Shared decision making for men facing prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019; 13: 1153-74

  20. Groeben C et al. Treatment of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review of interactive, personalized patient decision aids. Der Urologe. 2014; 53: 854-64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Violette PD et al. Decision aids for localized prostate cancer treatment choice: systematic review and meta-analysis. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65: 239-51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carlson LE et al. What goes up does not always come down: patterns of distress, physical and psychosocial morbidity in people with cancer over a one year period. Psychooncology. 2013; 22: 168-76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehnert A et al. One in two cancer patients is significantly distressed: Prevalence and indicators of distress. Psychooncology. 2018; 27: 75-82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehnert A et al. Four-week prevalence of mental disorders in patients with cancer across major tumor entities. J Clin Oncol. 2014, 32(31), 3540-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baumeister H et al. Auswirkungen komorbider psychischer Störungen bei chronischen körperlichen Erkrankungen. Zeitschrift für medizinische Psychologie. 2005; 14: 175-89

  26. Bhanvadia SK. Bladder Cancer Survivorship. Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19: 111

  27. Carlsson S et al. Risk of suicide in men with low-risk prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49: 1588-99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ernstmann N et al Determinants and implications of cancer patients' psychosocial needs. Support Care Cancer. 2009; 17: 1417-23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grassi L et al. Advancing psychosocial care in cancer patients. F1000Res. 2017; 6: 2083

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Dahl AA et al. Quality of life in survivors of testicular cancer. Urol Oncol. 2005; 23: 193-200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehnert A et al. Die deutsche Version des NCCN Distress-Thermometers: Empirische Prüfung eines Screening-instruments zur Erfassung psychosozialer Belastung bei Krebspatienten. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie. 2006; 54: 213-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chambers SK et al. The validity of the distress thermometer in prostate cancer populations. Psychooncology. 2014; 23: 195-203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Parahoo K et al. Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review. BJU Int. 2015; 116: 174-83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chambers SK et al. A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 85: e75-88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoey LM et al. Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 70: 315-37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. King AJ et al. Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015; 24: 618-34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Scheffold K et al. Efficacy of a brief manualized intervention Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) adapted to German cancer care settings: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15: 592

  38. Faller H et al. Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 782-93

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinisches Institut für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Uniklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany

    André Karger &  Dominik Fugmann

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany

    Nicole Ernstmann

Authors
  1. André Karger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominik Fugmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicole Ernstmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Karger.

Ethics declarations

Die Autoren erklären, dass er sich bei der Erstellung des Beitrags von keinen wirtschaftlichen Interessen leiten ließen und dass keine potenziellen Interessenkonflikte vorliegen.

Der Verlag erklärt, dass die inhaltliche Qualität des Beitrags von zwei unabhängigen Gutachtern geprüft wurde. Werbung in dieser Zeitschriftenausgabe hat keinen Bezug zur CME-Fortbildung.

Der Verlag garantiert, dass die CME-Fortbildung sowie die CME-Fragen frei sind von werblichen Aussagen und keinerlei Produktempfehlungen enthalten. Dies gilt insbesondere für Präparate, die zur Therapie des dargestellten Krankheitsbildes geeignet sind

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karger, A., Fugmann, D. & Ernstmann, N. Bedeutung von Kommunikation und psychoonkologischen Hilfen. Uro-News 24, 38–45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-020-4050-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-020-4050-8

Search

Navigation