Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical treatment of painful neuroma in amputated and non-amputated patients: does the level of neurotomy affect clinical outcomes?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of distal neurotomy (DN) versus proximal neurotomy (PN) for the surgical management of painful neuromas in amputees and non-amputees, whether used in passive or active treatment.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for painful traumatic neuromas between 2019 and 2022. DN with neuroma excision was performed at the level of the injury or amputation. PN was performed using a separate proximal approach without neuroma excision. Outcomes included a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, as well as patients’ subjective assessments.

Results

A total of 33 patients were included: 17 amputees and 16 non-amputees. They totalized 43 neuromas treated by DN in 21 cases and PN in 22 cases. At the median follow-up time of 13 months, there were significant decreases in all NRS and PROMIS scores in the whole series. The decrease in limb pain scores was not significantly different between groups, except for the decrease in pain interference and patient satisfaction which were higher in the DN group. Sub-group analyses found the same significant differences in amputees. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was associated with a higher decrease in PROMIS scores.

Conclusion

DN seemed to give better results in amputees but there were confusing factors related to associated lesions. In other situations, the non-inferiority of PN was demonstrated. PN could be of interest for treating neuromas of superficial sensory nerves, for avoiding direct revision of a well-fitted stump and in conjunction with TMR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

NRS:

numerical rating scale

PLP:

phantom limb pain

PROMIS:

patient-reported outcome measurement information system

TMR:

targeted muscle reinnervation

References

  1. Eberlin KR, Ducic I. Surgical algorithm for neuroma management: a changing treatment paradigm. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6:e1952.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Domeshek LF, Krauss EM, Snyder-Warwick AK, Laurido-Soto O, Hasak JM, Skolnick GB, et al. Surgical treatment of neuromas improves patient-reported pain, depression and quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:407–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyman E, Dahlin E, Gudinge H, Dahlin LB. Surgically treated neuroma in upper extremity: patients characteristics and factors influencing outcome of surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10:e4076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation treats neuroma and phantom pain in major limb amputees. A randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2019;270:238–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Souza JM, Cheesborough JE, Ko JH, Cho MS, Kuiken TA, Dumanian GA. Targeted muscle reinnervation: a novel approach to postamputation neuroma pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:2984–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiodo CP, Miller SD. Surgical treatment of superficial peroneal neuroma. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:689–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lans J, Gamo L, DiGiovanni CW, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Etiology and treatment outcomes for sural neuroma. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40:545–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathieu L, Diner C, Aries P, Thomas M, Truffaut S, de L’escalopier N. Preemptive targeted muscle reinnervation: the single incision approach should be avoided in trans-tibial traumatic amputation. Mil Med Res. 2022;9:60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Treatment of the painful neuroma by neuroma resection and muscle implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77:427–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstein SA, Sturim HS. Intraosseous nerve transposition for treatment of painful neuromas. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10:270–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sallaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8:283–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen W, Revicki D, Amtmann D, Jensen M, Keefe F, Cella D. Development and analysis of PROMIS pain intensity scale. Qual Life Res. 2012;20:18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Askew RL, Cook KF, Keefe FJ, Nowinski CJ, Cella D, Revicki DA, et al. A PROMIS measure of neuropathic pain quality. Value Health. 2016;19:623–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Revicki DA, Chen WH, Harnam N, Cook KF, Amtmann D, Callahan LF, et al. Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank. Pain. 2009;146:158–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, Chen WH, Choi S, Revicki D, et al. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010;150:173–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The patient-reported outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and testes its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1179–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Haute Autorité de Santé. Qualité des soins perçue par le patient– Indicateurs PROMs et PREMs Panorama d’expériences étrangères et principaux enseignements. Rapport du 1er juillet 2021. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-07. Accessed 1 December 2021.

  18. Brakkee EM, Stokvis A, DeVinney E, Ducic I, Coert JH. Surgical treatment strategies for injuries of the unforgiving superficial branch of the radial nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150:8453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gart MS, Souza JM, Dumanian GA. Targeted muscle reinnervation in the upper extremity amputee: a technical roadmap. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:e1877–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Potter BK, Burns TC, Lacap AP, Granville RR, Gajewski DA. Heterotopic ossification following traumatic and combat-related amputations. Prevalence, risk factors, and preliminary results of excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:476–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mioton LM, Dumanian GA, Shah N, Qiu CS, Ertl WJ, Potter BK, et al. Targeted muscle reinnervation improves residual limb pain, phantom limb pain, and limb function: a prospective study of 33 major limb amputees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:2161–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Valerio IL, Dumanian GA, Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Bowen JB, West JM, et al. Preemptive treatment of phantom and residual pain with targeted muscle reinnervation at the time of major limb amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228:217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoyt BW, Gibson JA, Potter BK, Souza JM. Practice patterns and pain outcomes for targeted muscle reinnervation: an informed approach to targeted muscle reinnervation use in the acute amputation setting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103:681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang BL, Mondshine J, Attinger CE, Kleiber GM. Targeted muscle reinnervation improves Pain and Ambulation outcomes in highly comorbid amputees. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;48:376–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang BL, Harbour P, Mondshine J, Kleiber GM. Targeted muscle reinnervation to expendable motor nerves for the treatment of refractory symptomatic neuromas in nonamputees. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9:e3436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Opijnen MP, Hazelbag HM, de Ruiter GCW. Targeted muscle reinnervation for a recurrent traumatic neuroma of the sural nerve: illustrative case. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2022;3:CASE2264.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.C., J.N.B., L.M. and Z.B. operated the patients. A.L.P., A.M., C.R., and S.A. collected the data. L.M. supervised the study and analyzed the data. A.L.P. and L.M. and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Mathieu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by our review board (Protocol No 42-2019 HIA-CS).

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lemaire-Petit, A., Milaire, A., Amar, S. et al. Surgical treatment of painful neuroma in amputated and non-amputated patients: does the level of neurotomy affect clinical outcomes?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02529-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02529-4

Keywords

Navigation