Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of acute perilunate injuries—a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this systematic review was to perform epidemiological as well as clinical, radiological and patient-reported outcome analysis of surgically treated perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations (PLDs and PLFDs) based on the so far largest pooled patient population to date.

Material and methods

This systematic review was written according to the updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases was performed. All studies reporting on complications, radiological, functional and/or patient-reported outcomes of surgically treated acute PLDs and PLFDs with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included.

Results

Twenty-six studies encompassing 550 patients with 553 operatively treated acute perilunate injuries (106 PLDs and 447 PLFDs) were included. The overall postoperative complication rate was 15.0% with secondary reduction loss representing the main contributing factor (10.1%). The overall reoperation rate was 10.4% and the incidence of salvage procedures was 2.8%. The risk for secondary reduction loss was higher for PLD than for PLFD injuries (24.2% vs. 7.0%, relative risk [RR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–7.5). There was a higher overall complication rate for the combined dorsopalmar approach when compared to the isolated dorsal approach (17.4% vs. 8.4%, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2–1.0, number needed to treat [NNT] 11.2) and for open surgery versus arthroscopic surgery (17.4% vs. 4.8%, RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.9, NNT 8.0). A significant correlation was found between radiological osteoarthritis (rOA) and follow-up duration of the individual studies, while functional and patient-rated outcomes were comparable.

Conclusions

Regardless of surgical technique, PLFDs appear to be less susceptible to secondary reduction loss than PLDs. Whenever possible, less invasive (e.g. arthroscopic) surgery should be performed to minimize postoperative complications. The rate of rOA is high and increases significantly with follow-up duration. Interestingly, rOA does not seem to correlate with reduced wrist function nor patient dissatisfaction and the need for salvage surgery is surprisingly rare.

Level of evidence: Systematic review of level IV studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw and metadata of this systematic literature review are on file with the corresponding author and can be made available upon request.

References

  1. Najarian R, Nourbakhsh A, Capo J, Tan V. Perilunate injuries. Hand (N Y). 2011;6:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11552-010-9293-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Apergis E, Maris J, Theodoratos G, Pavlakis D, Antoniou N. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations. Closed and early open reduction compared in 28 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;275:55–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krief E, Appy-Fedida B, Rotari V, David E, Mertl P, Maes-Clavier C. Results of perilunate dislocations and perilunate fracture dislocations with a minimum 15-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40:2191–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSA.2015.07.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Herzberg G, Comtet J, Linscheid R, Amadio P, Cooney W, Stalder J. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: a multicenter study. J Hand Surg (Am Vol Surg). 1993;18:768–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(93)90041-Z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Wei Q, Ji F, Tong DK, Tang H, Zhang H, et al. Manipulative reduction and plaster external fixation for the treatment of the scaphoid fracture and perilunate dislocation. China J Orthop Traumatol. 2018;31:441–5. https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1003-0034.2018.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scalcione L, Gimber L, Ho A, Johnston S, Sheppard J, Taljanovic M. Spectrum of carpal dislocations and fracture-dislocations: imaging and management. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:541–50. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg B, Goyal T, Kotwal P. Staged reduction of neglected transscaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation: a report of 16 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Garg B, Batra S. Chronic trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocation: current management protocol. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:523–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOT.2020.05.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Oest MJW, Duraku LS, Artan M, Hundepool CA, Power DM, Rajaratnam V, et al. Perilunate injury timing and treatment options: a systematic review. J Wrist Surg. 2021;11:164–76. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0041-1735841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Charalambous C, Mills S, Hayton M. Gradual distraction using an external fixator followed by open reduction in the treatment of chronic lunate dislocation. Hand Surg. 2010;15:27–9. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810410004436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta R, Kamboj K. Functional outcome after surgical treatment of perilunate injuries: a series of 12 cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016;7:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOT.2015.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller T, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Pire E, Prunières G, Facca S, Liverneaux P. Treatment of acute perilunate dislocations: ORIF versus proximal row carpectomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:95–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTSR.2016.10.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.D5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Agoritsas T, Merglen A, Courvoisier DS, Combescure C, Garin N, Perrier A, et al. Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14: e85. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson DO, Shanbhag V, Hedley H, Reichert I, Lipscombe S, Davis TRC. Scaphoid fracture non-union: a systematic review of surgical treatment using bone graft. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016;41:492–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415604778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harden NR, Bruehl S, Perez RSGM, Birklein F, Marinus J, Maihofner C, et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”) for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain. 2010;150:268–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Berriós-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:784–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH n.d. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 18 Jan 2022.

  20. Risk of bias tools—ROBINS-I detailed guidance (2016) n.d. https://sites.google.com/site/riskofbiastool/welcome/home/current-version-of-robins-i/robins-i-detailed-guidance-2016. Accessed 12 Aug 2022.

  21. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2010.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim J, Lee J, Park M. Arthroscopic reduction and percutaneous fixation of perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTHRO.2011.08.299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim J, Lee J, Park M. Arthroscopic treatment of perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations. J Wrist Surg. 2015;4:81–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0035-1550160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Savvidou O, Beltsios M, Sakellariou V, Mavrogenis A, Christodoulou M, Papagelopoulos P. Use of external fixation for perilunate dislocations and fracture dislocations. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014;9:141–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11751-014-0201-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Savvidou O, Beltsios M, Sakellariou V, Papagelopoulos P. Perilunate dislocations treated with external fixation and percutaneous pinning. J Wrist Surg. 2015;4:076–80. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0035-1550159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lebot G, Amouyel T, Hardy A, Chantelot C, Saab M. Perilunate fracture-dislocations: clinical and functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 33 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107:102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OTSR.2021.102973. (Epub 2021 May 27).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong T, Ip F. Minimally invasive management of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations. Hand Surg. 2008;13:159–65. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810408004018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Knoll V, Allan C, Trumble T. Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations: results of screw fixation of the scaphoid and lunotriquetral repair with a dorsal approach. J Hand Surg (Am Vol). 2005;30:1145–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSA.2005.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herzberg G, Forissier D. Acute dorsal trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations: medium-term results. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27:498–502. https://doi.org/10.1054/JHSB.2002.0774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sotereanos D, Mitsionis G, Giannakopoulos P, Tomaino M, Herndon J. Perilunate dislocation and fracture dislocation: a critical analysis of the volar-dorsal approach. J Hand Surg Am. 1997;22:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80179-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gabl M, Lutz M, Pechlaner S, Fink C. Perilunate dislocation and dislocation fractures—results of surgical management. Unfallchirurg. 1996;99:650–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/S001130050038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Çolak I, Bulut G, Bekler H, Çeçen G, Gülabi D. Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of perilunate injuries treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021;55:57–61. https://doi.org/10.5152/J.AOTT.2021.19246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hee HT, Wong HP, Med M, Low YP. Transscaphoid perilunate fracture/dislocations—results of surgical treatment. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999;28:791–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Meszaros T, Vögelin E, Mathys L, Leclère F. Perilunate fracture-dislocations: clinical and radiological results of 21 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138:287–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00402-017-2861-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. George J, Kumar K, Vijayakumar G, Ravishankar M. Functional outcome of surgically managed perilunate injuries. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54:270–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/S43465-020-00225-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lameijer C, Niezen C, El Moumni M, van der Sluis C. Pain, impaired functioning, poor satisfaction and diminished health status eight years following perilunate (fracture) dislocations. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42:849–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1512165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Özyürekoğlu T, Acar M. Treatment of acute perilunate dislocation or fracture dislocation using dorsal approach and diamond-shaped Kirschner-wire fixation. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2021;32:42–50. https://doi.org/10.5606/EHC.2021.74838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu B, Chen S, Zhu J, Tian G. Arthroscopic management of perilunate injuries. Hand Clin. 2017;33:709–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HCL.2017.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Griffin M, Roushdi I, Osagie L, Cerovac S, Umarji S. Patient-reported outcomes following surgically managed perilunate dislocation: outcomes after perilunate dislocation. Hand (N Y). 2016;11:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944715617222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kremer T, Wendt M, Riedel K, Sauerbier M, Germann G, Bickert B. Open reduction for perilunate injuries—clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:1599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSA.2010.06.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Martinage A, Balaguer T, Chignon-Sicard B, Monteil M, Dréant N, Lebreton E. Perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the wrist, a review of 14 cases. Chir Main. 2008;27:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MAIN.2007.10.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hildebrand K, Ross D, Patterson S, Roth J, MacDermid J, King G. Dorsal perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: questionnaire, clinical, and radiographic evaluation. J Hand Surg (Am Vol). 2000;25:1069–79. https://doi.org/10.1053/JHSU.2000.17868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Savvidou OD, Beltsios M, Sakellariou VI, Papagelopoulos PJ. Perilunate dislocations treated with external fixation and percutaneous pinning. J Wrist Surg. 2015;4:76–80. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0035-1550159.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kural C, Tanriverdi B, Erçin E, Baca E, Yilmaz M. The surgical outcomes of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations. Turkish J Med Sci. 2020;50:25–30. https://doi.org/10.3906/SAG-1710-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dunn J, Koehler L, Kusnezov N, Polfer E, Orr J, Pirela-Cruz M, et al. Perilunate dislocations and perilunate fracture dislocations in the U.S. Military. J Wrist Surg. 2018;7:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0037-1603932.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Oh W, Choi Y, Kang H, Koh I, Lim K. Comparative outcome analysis of arthroscopic-assisted versus open reduction and fixation of trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture dislocations. Arthroscopy. 2017;33:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARTHRO.2016.07.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kara A, Celik H, Seker A, Kilinc E, Camur S, Uzun M. Surgical treatment of dorsal perilunate fracture-dislocations and prognostic factors. Int J Surg. 2015;24:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSU.2015.10.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chou Y, Hsu Y, Cheng C, Wu C. Percutaneous screw and axial Kirschner wire fixation for acute transscaphoid perilunate fracture dislocation. J Hand Surg (Am Vol) 2012;37:715–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSA.2012.01.019

  49. Malović M, Pavić R, Milosević M. Treatment of trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations using a volar approach with scaphoid osteosynthesis and temporary Kirschner wire fixation. Mil Med. 2011;176:1077–82. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lutz M, Arora R, Kammerlander C, Gabl M, Pechlaner S. Stabilization of perilunate and transscaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations via a combined palmar and dorsal approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009;21:442–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00064-009-1906-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Hohendorff B, Saalabian A, Hahne M, van Schoonhoven J, Prommersberger K. Median nerve neuropathy after perilunate dislocation injuries. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2014;46:163–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0034-1370959.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schaller P, Grünert J. Late outcome after surgical treatment of perilunar dislocation and dislocation fractures. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1998;30:298–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Forli A, Courvoisier A, Wimsey S, Corcella D, Moutet F. Perilunate dislocations and transscaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocations: a retrospective study with minimum ten-year follow-up. J Hand Surg (Am Vol) 2010;35:62–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSA.2009.09.003

  54. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-44/FIGURES/1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All listed authors have made substantial contributions to this article. The design and conception of the work, analysis, and interpretation of data was carried out by RL, DNM and SH. RL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Critical revision for important intellectual content as well as final approval of the version to be published was done by AOG, BJMVDW and EV. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémy Liechti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liechti, R., Merky, D.N., Grobbelaar, A.O. et al. Outcomes of acute perilunate injuries—a systematic review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 2071–2084 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02222-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02222-y

Keywords

Navigation