Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional anesthesia in trauma patients: a quality improvement study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Traumatic injury is associated with severe pain that is often inadequately managed. Opioids remain the mainstay of pain management in this population because of their ease of use. However, opioids have significant side effects including nausea, delirium, and respiratory depression. Regional anesthesia has been demonstrated in the perioperative setting to provide superior analgesia with fewer side effects and a reduced length of stay. Similarly, regional anesthesia has been shown to improve morbidity for extremity fractures and dislocations when introduced early.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort quality improvement study evaluating the use of earlier and more consistent regional anesthesia procedures in 28 consecutive trauma patients at a large Canadian trauma center. In this quasi-experimental before and after study, we identified all trauma patients with an ISS < 15 that would have been candidates for a peripheral nerve block and compared them to the study population that received a regional anesthesia nerve block within 24 h of admission.

Results

The introduction of a multidisciplinary pain program into our level 1 regional trauma center resulted in a decrease in pain severity and opioid consumption of 55% and 61%, respectively, after 24 h of admission. Length of stay in the emergency department decreased (11.5 ± 6.9 vs. 4.9 ± 4.4 h; p < 0.01) while hospital length of stay did not (338 ± 276 vs. 285 ± 205 h; p = 0.4).

Conclusion

This quality improvement proof-of-principle study reveals the potential advantages for regional anesthesia, such as decreased emergency department use, opioid consumption, and pain severity. Further randomized trials are necessary, however, to describe a direct benefit from peripheral nerve blockade on reducing length of stay for trauma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen SP, Christo PJ, Moroz L. Pain management in trauma patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:142–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berben SA, Meijs TH, van Dongen RT, van Vugt AB, Vloet LC, Mintjes-de Groot JJ, van Achterberg T. Pain prevalence and pain relief in trauma patients in the accident & emergency department. Injury. 2008;39:578–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sokoloff C, Daoust R, Paquet J, Chauny JM. Is adequate pain relief and time to analgesia associated with emergency department length of stay? Retrosp Study BMJ Open. 2014;25:4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ganter MT, Blumenthal S, Dübendorfer S, Brunnschweiler S, Hofer T, Klaghofer R, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. The length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit correlates with pain intensity, nausea and vomiting on arrival. Perioper Med. 2014;26:3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:248–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuignet O, Pirson J, Boughrouph J, Duville D. The efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management in burn patients undergoing skin grafting procedures. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1077–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chudinov A, Berkenstadt H, Salai M, Cahana A, Perel A. Continuous psoas compartment block for anesthesia and perioperative analgesia in patients with hip fractures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:563–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richman JM, Liu SS, Courpas G, Wong R, Rowlingson AJ, McGready J, Cohen SR, Wu CL. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:248–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Waddle JP, Evers AS, Piccirillo JF. Postanesthesia care unit length of stay: quantifying and assessing dependent factors. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:628–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee RB, Bass SM, Morris JA Jr. Three or more rib fractures as an indicator for transfer to a Level I trauma center: a population-based study. J trauma. 1990;30:689–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blaivas M, Adhikari S, Lander L. A prospective comparison of procedural sedation and ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block for shoulder reduction in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:922–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luger TJ, Kammerlander C, Gosch M. Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter? Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:555–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker MJ, Handoll HH, Griffiths R. Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000521.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tezel O, Kaldirim U, Bilgic S, et al. A comparison of suprascapular nerve block and procedural sedation analgesia in shoulder dislocation reduction. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32:549–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edwards D, Bowden M, Aldington DJ. Pain management at role. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155:58–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Beaudoin FL, Haran JP, Liebmann O. A comparison of ultrasound-guided three-in-one femoral nerve block versus parenteral opioids alone for analgesia in emergency department patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20:584–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neubrand TL, Roswell K, Deakyne S, Kocher K, Wathen J. Fascia iliaca compartment nerve block versus systemic pain control for acute femur fractures in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30:469–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stone MB, Wang R, Price DD. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block vs procedural sedation for the treatment of upper extremity emergencies. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:706–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes S, Birt D. Continuous peripheral nerve blockade on OP HERRICK 9. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155(1):57–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner AL, Stevenson MD, Cross KP. Impact of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30:227–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rung GW, Marshall WK. Nerve blocks in the critical care environment. Crit Care Clin. 1990;6:343–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller SL, Cleeman E, Auerbach J, Flatow EL. Comparison of intra-articular lidocaine and intravenous sedation for reduction of shoulder dislocations: a randomized, prospective study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84-A:2135–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asad EP, Duby J. Opioid conversions in acute care. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:255–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kosir R, Moore FA, Selby JH, et al. Acute lower extremity compartment syndrome (ALECS) screening protocol in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2007;63:268–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mar GJ, Barrington MJ, McGuirk BR. Acute compartment syndrome of the lower limb and the effect of postoperative analgesia on diagnosis. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:3–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Radresa O, Chauny J-M, Lavigne G, Piette E, Paquet J, Daoust R. Current views on acute to chronic pain transition in post-traumatic patients: risk factors and potential for pre-emptive treatments. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1142–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gadsden J, Warlick A. Regional anesthesia for the trauma patient: improving patient outcomes. Local Reg Anesth. 2015;8:45–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Perlman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Ryan Perlman and Dr. Sam Bonge declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

I, Ryan Perlman, affirm that the manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted. All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This includes ethical standards in Canada where Ethics was granted for this study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perlman, R., Bonge, S. Regional anesthesia in trauma patients: a quality improvement study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 495–504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02097-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02097-5

Keywords

Navigation