Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anatomical analysis of different helical plate designs for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Helical plates are preferably used for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation and potentially avoid radial nerve irritation.

Aims

Safety of applying four different long plate designs (straight, 45°-, 90°-helical and ALPS) with MIPO technique as well as assessment and comparison of their distances to adjacent anatomical structures.

Methods

MIPO was performed in 16 human cadaveric humeri using either a straight (group 1), a 45°-helical (group 2), a 90°-helical (group 3) plate, or an ALPS (group 4). Applying CT angiography, distances between brachial arteries and plates were evaluated. All specimens were dissected and distances to the axillary, radial and musculocutaneous nerve were evaluated.

Results

No specimens demonstrated injuries of the anatomical structures at risk after MIPO with all investigated plate designs. Closest overall distance (mean (range); mm) between each plate and the radial nerve was 1 (1–3) in group 1, 7 (2–11) in group 2, 14 (7–25) in group 3 and 6 (3–8) in group 4. It was significantly bigger in group 3 and significantly smaller in group 1 compared to all other groups, p < 0.001. Closest overall distance between each plate and the musculocutaneous nerve was 16 (8–28) in group 1, 11 (7–18) in group 2, 3 (2–4) in group 3 and 6 (3–8) in group 4. It was significantly bigger in group 1 and significantly smaller in group 3 compared to all other groups, p < 0.001.

Conclusions

MIPO with 45°- and 90°-helical plates as well as with ALPS is safely feasible and demonstrates significantly bigger distances to the radial nerve compared to straight plates. However, the distances remain small and attention must be paid to the musculocutaneous nerve and the brachial artery when MIPO is applied using ALPS, 45°- and 90°-helical implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

References

  1. Beeres FJ, Diwersi N, Houwert MR, Link BC, Heng M, Knobe M, et al. ORIF versus MIPO for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies. Injury. 2021;52:653–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Link BC, Rosenkranz J, Winkler J. Babst R [Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal femur]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24:324–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasenboehler E, Rikli D, Babst R. Locking compression plate with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in diaphyseal and distal tibial fracture: a retrospective study of 32 patients. Injury. 2007;38:365–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF, Chow SP. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture. Int Orthop. 2007;31:657–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández Dell’Oca AA. The principle of helical implants. Unusual ideas worth considering. Injury. 2002;33 Suppl 1:SA1–27.

  6. Dauwe J, Grechenig P, Unterfrauner I, Schwarz A, Weiglein A, Hohenberger G. Axillary nerve elongation in humeral fracture plating: a cadaveric study for comparison between straight and helical Philos plates. J Orthop. 2020;19:233–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Da Silva T, Rummel F, Knop C, Merkle T. Comparing iatrogenic radial nerve lesions in humeral shaft fractures treated with helical or straight PHILOS plates: a 10-year retrospective cohort study of 62 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140:1931–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Lorich DG. Helical plating of the proximal humerus. Injury. 2005;36:1197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunner A, Thormann S, Babst R. Minimally invasive percutaneous plating of proximal humeral shaft fractures with the Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:1056–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Chen L-W, Zhang W-J, Zhao C-M, Huang B, Yu Q, et al. Treatment of proximal and middle one-third humeral fractures with lateral distal tibial helical plate. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012;22:673–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan JCH, Kagda FHY, Murphy D, Thambiah JS, Khong KS. Minimally invasive helical plating for shaft of humerus fractures: technique and outcome. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:184–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang KH. Helical plate fixation for treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal and middle one-third of the humerus. Injury. 2005;36:75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Argyropoulos M, Kent M. Early Results of the A.L.P.S. Proximal Humerus Locking Plate. Open Orthop J. 2018;12:53–8.

  14. Babst R. Humerus, proximal—introduction [Internet]. Second, expanded edition. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO). Thieme Verlag; 2012 [cited 2021 Nov 17]. https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ebooks/lookinside/https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0034-87611?device=desktop&innerWidth=412&offsetWidth=412

  15. Sommer C. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthsis 2nd Expanded Edition Thieme Verlag; Ed. R. Babst et al. © 2012 Georg Thieme Verlag KG. Thieme Verlag; 2012.

  16. Moon J-G, Kwon H-N, Biraris S, Shon W-Y. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a helical plate for metadiaphyseal complex fractures of the proximal humerus. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e237-243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Q, Hu J, Guan J, Chen Y, Wang L. Proximal third humeral shaft fractures fixed with long helical PHILOS plates in elderly patients: benefit of pre-contouring plates on a 3D-printed model-a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maes V, Putzeys G. One-year follow-up after treatment of proximal and/or middle one-third humeral shaft fractures with a helical plate: healing rates, complications and functional outcome measures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:890.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Apivatthakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury. 2005;36:530–8.

  20. Apivatthakakul T, Patiyasikan S, Luevitoonvechkit S. Danger zone for locking screw placement in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of humeral shaft fractures: a cadaveric study. Injury. 2010;41:169–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwab TR, Stillhard PF, Schibli S, Furrer M, Sommer C. Radial nerve palsy in humeral shaft fractures with internal fixation: analysis of management and outcome. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44:235–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Claessen FMAP, Peters RM, Verbeek DO, Helfet DL, Ring D. Factors associated with radial nerve palsy after operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:e307-311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiamton C, Apivatthakakul T. The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) on the medial side of the femur: A cadaveric injection study. Injury. 2015;46:2170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Livani B, Belangero WD. Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. Injury. 2004;35:587–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Livani B, Belangero W, Andrade K, Zuiani G, Pratali R. Is MIPO in humeral shaft fractures really safe? Postoperative ultrasonographic evaluation Int Orthop. 2009;33:1719–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekdahl M, Dominguez C, Pinedo M, López S, Gutiérrez V. New precontoured long locking plate for proximal metadiaphyseal fractures of the humerus: a cadaveric study for its use with the minimally invasive technique. JSES Int. 2021;5:540–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Rispoli DM, Athwal GS, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. The anatomy of the deltoid insertion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:386–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakoma Y, Sano H, Shinozaki N, Itoigawa Y, Yamamoto N, Ozaki T, et al. Anatomical and functional segments of the deltoid muscle. J Anat. 2011;218:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Klepps S, Auerbach J, Calhon O, Lin J, Cleeman E, Flatow E. A cadaveric study on the anatomy of the deltoid insertion and its relationship to the deltopectoral approach to the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13:322–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arumilli B, Suhm N, Marcel J, Rikli D. Long PHILOS plate fixation in a series of humeral fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:1383–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Benninger E, Meier C. Minimally invasive lateral plate placement for metadiaphyseal fractures of the humerus and its implications for the distal deltoid insertion- it is not only about the radial nerve. A cadaveric study Injury. 2017;48:615–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are not compensated and there are no other institutional subsidies, corporate affiliations, or funding sources supporting this work unless clearly documented and disclosed. This study was performed with the assistance of the AO Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Pastor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

All procedures performed in this study were followed in accordance with relevant guidelines. This study was approved by the institutional internal review board, based on the approval of the specimens' delivery by Science Care Ethics Committee. All donors gave their informed consent inherent within the donation of the anatomical gift statement during their lifetime, as registered by Science Care.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed to the publication of the current study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pastor, T., Kastner, P., Souleiman, F. et al. Anatomical analysis of different helical plate designs for proximal humeral shaft fracture fixation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 49, 411–418 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02082-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02082-y

Keywords

Navigation