Skip to main content
Log in

Use of an intramedullary fibular strut allograft and dual locking plate in periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasty: new application of a well-known treatment method in trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Augmenting fracture fixation with intramedullary fibular graft has seen several applications such as in comminuted proximal humerus fractures, and femoral neck and shaft nonunion. The purpose of this study was to report the first case series demonstrating the novel application of an intramedullary fibular allograft strut and dual locking plates on complicated periprosthetic fracture of distal femur.

Methods

The patient demographics, weight-bearing status, and radiographic and clinical outcomes of six patients, who were treated for periprosthetic distal femur fractures using an intramedullary fibular allograft strut and dual locking plate, between January 2018 and April 2020 were analyzed.

Results

Postoperative range of knee motion showed median 10’ (range 10–20) of flexion contracture and 90’ (range 80–110) of further flexion. Postoperative joint function was assessed according to the Kolmert functional criteria, with “excellent to good” in angular deformity and “Good to fair” result in range of motion and pain. RUSH score was assessed, and median score was 24 (range 18–26). All patients were able to ambulate without assistance 6 months after surgery.

Conclusion

In summary, the application of fibular strut graft and dual locking plate might be an option in complicated distal femur fracture above total knee arthroplasty. Albeit with an available number, such application showed promise as an intramedullary and cortical support for both reduction and maintenance of correction alignment, length, and prevention of further angular deformity.

Level of evidence IV: Surgical technique and Cases-series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

None.

References

  1. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Bozic KJ. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:624–30. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DiGioia A 3rd, Rubash HE. Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. A literature review and treatment algorithm. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;271:135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Makinen TJ, Dhotar HS, Fichman SG, Gunton MJ, Woodside M, Safir O, et al. Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison of four methods of fixation. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1737–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2764-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khan S, Schmidt AH. Distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty: when and how? J Knee Surg. 2019;32:388–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann MF, Jones CB, Sietsema DL, Koenig SJ, Tornetta P 3rd. Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty. Injury. 2012;43:1084–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebraheim NA, Liu J, Hashmi SZ, Sochacki KR, Moral MZ, Hirschfeld AG. High complication rate in locking plate fixation of lower periprosthetic distal femur fractures in patients with total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplast. 2012;27:809–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liporace FA, Yoon RS. Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:e64–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith WR, Stoneback JW, Morgan SJ, Stahel PF. Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2016;10:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkes MB, Little MT, Lazaro LE, Cymerman RM, Pardee NC, Helfet DL, et al. Intramedullary allograft fibula as a reduction and fixation tool for treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures with diaphyseal extension. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:e56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebraheim NA, Sabry FF, Elgafy H. Intramedullary fibular allograft and nail for treatment of femoral shaft nonunion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2002;31:270–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elgafy H, Ebraheim NA, Bach HG. Revision internal fixation and nonvascular fibular graft for femoral neck nonunion. J Trauma. 2011;70:169–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e5108b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar A, Chambers I, Maistrelli G, Wong P. Management of periprosthetic fracture above total knee arthroplasty using intramedullary fibular allograft and plate fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:554–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JW, Wang CJ. Supracondylar fractures of the femur above total knee arthroplasties with cortical allograft struts. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:365–72. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.31077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Christ AB, Chawla H, Gausden EB, Villa JC, Wellman DS, Lorich DG, et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:515–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernaus M, Slobogean GP, Bzovsky S, Heels-Ansdell D, Zhou Q, Bhandari M, et al. Early radiographic union score for hip is predictive of femoral neck fracture complications within 2 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34:e195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolmert L, Wulf K. Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(6):957–62. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678208992855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Medda S, Kessler RB, Halvorson JJ, Pilson HT, Babcock S, Carroll EA. Technical trick: dual plate fixation of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35:e148–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: Part II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1090–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Walch G, Badet R, Nove-Josserand L, Levigne C. Nonunions of the surgical neck of the humerus: surgical treatment with an intramedullary bone peg, internal fixation, and cancellous bone grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996;5:161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80001-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schliemann B, Wähnert D, Theisen C, Herbort M, Kösters C, Raschke MJ, et al. How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data. Injury. 2015;46:1207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cui X, Chen H, Ma B, Fan W, Li H. Fibular strut allograft influences reduction and outcomes after locking plate fixation of comminuted proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:511. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2907-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Al Farii H, Cloutier JP, AlQahtani S, Kreder H, Mutch J. Endosteal substitution with medial plate in the treatment of acute distal femur fracture (AO/OTA type A): surgical technique and case-series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02945-x

  24. Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh J. Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:S8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:353–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.10.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Larsen P, Ceccotti AA, Elsoe R. High mortality following distal femur fractures: a cohort study including three hundred and two distal femur fractures. Int Orthop. 2020;44:173–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04343-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen SH, Chiang MC, Hung CH, Lin SC, Chang HW. Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21:224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE. Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12:12–20. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200401000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bolhofner BR, Carmen B, Clifford P. The results of open reduction and internal fixation of distal femur fractures using a biologic (indirect) reduction technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:372–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wadhwa H, Salazar BP, Goodnough LH, et al. Distal femur replacement versus open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Springer BD, Sim FH, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG. The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;421:181–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Unwin P, Cannon S, Grimer R, Kemp H, Sneath R, Walker P. Aseptic loosening in cemented custom-made prosthetic replacements for bone tumours of the lower limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:5–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fakler J, Hepp P, Marquaß B, von Dercks N, Josten C. Is distal femoral replacement an adequate therapeutic option after complex fractures of the distal femur? Z Orthop Unfall. 2013;151:173–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DS and S-W L made contribution to study design, acquisition, interpretation of data and writing of the manuscript. J-H J, HC, J-Y H, and J-Y K were involved in data collection and analysis. S-W L supervised investigation and its interpretation. All authors made critical feedback and helped shape the study, analysis, and manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Se-Won Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by IRB: DC21RISI0060.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suh, D., Ji, JH., Heu, JY. et al. Use of an intramedullary fibular strut allograft and dual locking plate in periprosthetic fractures above total knee arthroplasty: new application of a well-known treatment method in trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 4105–4111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01940-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01940-z

Keywords

Navigation