Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is it possible to improve prediction of outcome and blood requirements in the severely injured patients by defining categories of coagulopathy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It has been suggested to define the Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) with a PTratio threshold of 1.20. We hypothesized that a more pragmatic classification would grade severity according to the PTratio (or corresponding ROTEM clotting time: EXTEM-CT), and that this would correlate better with the need for blood products (BP) and prognosis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 1076 severely injured patients admitted from 01/2011 to 12/2019 in a university hospital. To determine the number of TIC categories and the best PTratio or EXTEM-CT thresholds for mortality at 24-h, a modified Mazumdar approach was used. Multivariate regression analyses were done to describe the relationship between PTratio and ROTEM parameter subclasses with mortality.

Results

Three thresholds were, respectively, identified for PTratio (1.20, 1.90 and 3.00) and EXTEM-CT (90 s, 130 s, 200 s). The following categories were defined for PTratio: ≤ 1.20 (No TIC), 1.21–1.90 (Moderate TIC), 1.91–3.00 (severe TIC), > 3.00 (major TIC); and for EXTEM-CT: < 91 s (no TIC), 91–130 s (moderate TIC), 131–200 s (severe TIC) and > 200 s (major TIC). We observed that when the PTratio (or EXTEM-CT) increased, mortality and BP requirements increased. After multiple adjustments, we observed that each subclass of PTratio and EXTEM-CT was independently associated with mortality at 24-h.

Conclusion

In this study, we have described a pragmatic classification of coagulopathy utilizing PTratio and EXTEM-CT where increasing severity was associated with prognosis and the amount of BP administered. This could allow clinicians to better predict the outcome and anticipate the need for blood products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [JSD].

References

  1. Cap A, Hunt B. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(6):638–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. David JS, Voiglio EJ, Cesareo E, Vassal O, Decullier E, et al. Prehospital parameters can help to predict coagulopathy and massive transfusion in trauma patients. Vox Sang. 2017;112:557–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Floccard B, Rugeri L, Faure A, Saint Denis M, Boyle EM, Peguet O, Levrat A, Guillaume C, Marcotte G, Vulliez A, et al. Early coagulopathy in trauma patients: an on-scene and hospital admission study. Injury. 2012;43(1):26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spahn DR, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Duranteau J, Filipescu D, Hunt BJ, Komadina R, Maegele M, Nardi G, Riddez L, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hess JR, Lindell AL, Stansbury LG, Dutton RP, Scalea TM. The prevalence of abnormal results of conventional coagulation tests on admission to a trauma center. Transfusion. 2009;49(1):34–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peltan ID, Vande Vusse LK, Maier RV, Watkins TR. An international normalized ratio-based definition of acute traumatic coagulopathy is associated with mortality, venous thromboembolism, and multiple organ failure after injury. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(7):1429–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frith D, Goslings JC, Gaarder C, Maegele M, Cohen MJ, Allard S, Johansson PI, Stanworth S, Thiemermann C, Brohi K. Definition and drivers of acute traumatic coagulopathy: clinical and experimental investigations. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8(9):1919–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guth C, Vassal O, Friggeri A, Wey PF, Inaba K, Decullier E, Ageron FX, David JS. Effects of modification of trauma bleeding management: a before and after study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38:469–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brockamp T, Nienaber U, Mutschler M, Wafaisade A, Peiniger S, Lefering R, Bouillon B, Maegele M, TraumaRegister DGU. Predicting on-going hemorrhage and transfusion requirement after severe trauma: a validation of six scoring systems and algorithms on the TraumaRegister DGU. Crit Care. 2012;16(4):R129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGU: the revised injury severity classification, version II. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman MD, Makley AT, Hanseman DJ, Pritts TA, Robinson BR. All the bang without the bucks: defining essential point-of-care testing for traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(1):117–24 (Discussion 124).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. David JS, Levrat A, Inaba K, Macabeo C, Rugeri L, Fontaine O, Cheron A, Piriou V. Utility of a point-of-care device for rapid determination of prothrombin time in trauma patients: a preliminary study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(3):703–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Francis RCE, Theurl I, Maegele M, Graw JA. Point-of-care diagnostics of coagulation in the management of bleeding and transfusion in trauma patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33(2):246–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bugaev N, Como JJ, Golani G, Freeman JJ, Sawhney JS, Vatsaas CJ, Yorkgitis BK, Kreiner LA, Garcia NM, Aziz HA, et al. Thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry in bleeding patients with coagulopathy: practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(6):999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Einersen PM, Moore EE, Chapman MP, Moore HB, Gonzalez E, Silliman CC, Banerjee A, Sauaia A. Rapid thrombelastography thresholds for goal-directed resuscitation of patients at risk for massive transfusion. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(1):114–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly JM, Rizoli S, Veigas P, Hollands S, Min A. Using rotational thromboelastometry clot firmness at 5 minutes (ROTEM((R)) EXTEM A5) to predict massive transfusion and in-hospital mortality in trauma: a retrospective analysis of 1146 patients. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(9):1103–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Veigas PV, Callum J, Rizoli S, Nascimento B, da Luz LT. A systematic review on the rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM(R)) values for the diagnosis of coagulopathy, prediction and guidance of blood transfusion and prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24(1):114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schochl H, Cotton B, Inaba K, Nienaber U, Fischer H, Voelckel W, Solomon C. FIBTEM provides early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davenport R, Manson J, De’Ath H, Platton S, Coates A, Allard S, Hart D, Pearse R, Pasi KJ, MacCallum P, et al. Functional definition and characterization of acute traumatic coagulopathy. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2652–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hagemo JS, Christiaans SC, Stanworth SJ, Brohi K, Johansson PI, Goslings JC, Naess PA, Gaarder C. Detection of acute traumatic coagulopathy and massive transfusion requirements by means of rotational thromboelastometry: an international prospective validation study. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. David JS, Bouzat P, Raux M. Evolution and organisation of trauma systems. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38(2):161–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hans GA, Besser MW. The place of viscoelastic testing in clinical practice. Br J Haematol. 2016;173(1):37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carll T, Wool GD. Basic principles of viscoelastic testing. Transfusion. 2020;60(Suppl 6):S1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments. Stat Med. 2000;15(19):113–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sartorius D, Le Manach Y, David JS, Rancurel E, Smail N, Thicoipe M, Wiel E, Ricard-Hibon A, Berthier F, Gueugniaud PY, et al. Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(3):831–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leemann H, Lustenberger T, Talving P, Kobayashi L, Bukur M, Brenni M, Bruesch M, Spahn DR, Keel MJ. The role of rotation thromboelastometry in early prediction of massive transfusion. J Trauma. 2010;69(6):1403–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Daniel Y, Habas S, Malan L, Escarment J, David JS, Peyrefitte S. Tactical damage control resuscitation in austere military environments. J R Army Med Corps. 2016;162:419–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Abraham P, Pasquier P, Rimmele T, David JS. Trauma patients do not benefit from a viscoelastic haemostatic assay-guided protocol, but why? Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(6):726–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Baksaas-Aasen K, Gall LS, Stensballe J, Juffermans NP, Curry N, Maegele M, Brooks A, Rourke C, Gillespie S, Murphy J, et al. Viscoelastic haemostatic assay augmented protocols for major trauma haemorrhage (ITACTIC): a randomized, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(1):49–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Haider AH, David JS, Zafar SN, Gueugniaud PY, Efron DT, Floccard B, MacKenzie EJ, Voiglio E. Comparative effectiveness of inhospital trauma resuscitation at a French trauma center and matched patients treated in the United States. Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):178–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JSD conceived the study and designed the trial. CC and LF supervised data collection. JSD, LF and CC managed the data. CC and CHV provided statistical advice on study design and analyzed the data. PB, AF, KI and MM did a critical review of the manuscript. JSD drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. JSD takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Stéphane David.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

JS David and P Bouzat received honoraria for lectures, advisory boards (LFB, Les Ullis, France; Werfen/TEM International, Le pré St Germain, France), M Maegele received honoraria for lectures, speakers’ bureaus, advisory boards and research projects from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Biotest, CSL Behring, IL-Werfen/TEM International and LFB Biomedicaments. No conflict of interest for the other authors.

Ethics approval

The regional emergency network RESUVAL obtained official approval from the Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberte (DE 2012-059), the CCTIRS (Comité consultatif sur le traitement de l'information en matière de recherche) and the Institutional review board (02/2020).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required and all patients (or their next of kin) were provided with information about the registry.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

David, JS., Friggeri, A., Vacheron, CH. et al. Is it possible to improve prediction of outcome and blood requirements in the severely injured patients by defining categories of coagulopathy?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 2751–2761 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01882-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01882-6

Keywords

Navigation