Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

MIPO vs. intra-medullary nailing for extra-articular distal tibia fractures and the efficacy of intra-operative alignment control: a retrospective cohort of 135 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Definitive treatment of distal extra-articular fractures of the tibia is challenging and both minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are considered to be feasible surgical modalities with their own implant-specific merits and demerits. This retrospective study was designed to compare MIPO versus IMN in terms of fracture healing, complications, functional and radiological outcomes and to assess the efficacy of intra-operative alignment control to reduce the rate of malalignment after definitive fixation of distal extra-articular fractures of the tibia.

Materials and methods

All consecutive adult patients with extra-articular distal meta- or diaphyseal tibia fractures that were treated between January 2012 and September 2019 either with MIPO or IMN were included. Outcome measures included fracture healing, complications (infection, malalignment, subsequent surgeries), functional and radiological outcomes. Intra-operative alignment control encompassed bilateral draping of the lower extremities.

Results

A total of 135 patients were included out of which 72 patients (53%) were treated with MIPO and 63 patients (47%) underwent IMN. There was a significantly higher incidence of non-union for fractures treated with IMN (13 (22%) vs. 4 (6%), p = 0.04). There was no significant difference between both groups in terms of rotational malalignment (3% vs. 10%) and angular malalignment (4% vs. 5%). A significantly higher rate of infection was found after MIPO after correction of significant differences in baseline characteristics. No differences were found in subsequent surgeries or functional outcomes.

Conclusion

Both MIPO and IMN are reliable surgical techniques. IMN is associated with higher rates of non-union, whereas MIPO results in a higher risk for infection. The incidence of malalignment was surprisingly low endorsing the utility of the intra-operative alignment control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costa ML, Achten J, Griffin J, Petrou S, Pallister I, Lamb SE, Parsons NR, Fix DTTI. Effect of locking plate fixation vs intramedullary nail fixation on 6-month disability among adults with displaced fracture of the distal tibia: the UK FixDT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(18):1767–76. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.16429.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mauffrey C, McGuinness K, Parsons N, Achten J, Costa ML. A randomised pilot trial of “locking plate” fixation versus intramedullary nailing for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(5):704–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B5.28498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(12):736–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robinson CM, McLauchlan GJ, McLean IP, Court-Brown CM. Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(5):781–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vaienti E, Schiavi P, Ceccarelli F, Pogliacomi F. Treatment of distal tibial fractures: prospective comparative study evaluating two surgical procedures with investigation for predictive factors of unfavourable outcome. Int Orthop. 2019;43(1):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4121-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seyhan M, Unay K, Sener N. Intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous locked plating of distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(5):595–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1016-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan DS, Serrano-Riera R, Griffing R, Steverson B, Infante A, Watson D, Sagi HC, Sanders RW. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar tibial nail insertion: a prospective randomized control pilot study. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(3):130–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones M, Parry M, Whitehouse M, Mitchell S. Radiologic outcome and patient-reported function after intramedullary nailing: a comparison of the retropatellar and infrapatellar approach. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(5):256–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leliveld MS, Verhofstad MH. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve, a possible cause for anterior knee pain after tibial nailing? Injury. 2012;43(6):779–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.09.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozcan C, Turkmen I, Sokucu S. Comparison of three different approaches for anterior knee pain after tibia intramedullary nailing. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(1):99–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0988-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS. A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(7):984–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B7.22959.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Im GI, Tae SK. Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. J Trauma. 2005;59(5):1219–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000188936.79798.4e(discussion 1223).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vallier HA. Current evidence: plate versus intramedullary nail for fixation of distal tibia fractures in 2016. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(Suppl 4):S2–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang SW, Tzeng HM, Chou YJ, Teng HP, Liu HH, Wong CY. Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2006;37(6):531–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Avilucea FR, Triantafillou K, Whiting PS, Perez EA, Mir HR. Suprapatellar intramedullary nail technique lowers rate of malalignment of distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(10):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. JSBS classics. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(4):682. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200204000-00029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Babst R, Khong K. Minimally invasive surgery. AO principles of fracture management. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0038-160823.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S1–170. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller MENS, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Lack WD, Starman JS, Seymour R, Bosse M, Karunakar M, Sims S, Kellam J. Any cortical bridging predicts healing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(13):1066–72. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenger R, Oehme F, Winkler J, Perren SM, Babst R, Beeres FJP. Absolute or relative stability in minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis of simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures? Injury. 2017;48(6):1217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bleeker NJ, Cain M, Rego M, Saarig A, Chan A, Sierevelt I, Doornberg JN, Jaarsma RL. Bilateral low-dose computed tomography assessment for post-operative rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: reliability of a practical imaging technique. Injury. 2018;49(10):1895–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cain ME, Hendrickx LAM, Bleeker NJ, Lambers KTA, Doornberg JN, Jaarsma RL. Prevalence of rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: can we reliably use the contralateral uninjured side as the reference standard? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(7):582–91. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Milner SA. A more accurate method of measurement of angulation after fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(6):972–4. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.79b6.7458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999;27(2):97–132 (quiz 133–134; discussion 196).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Masquelet A, Kanakaris NK, Obert L, Stafford P, Giannoudis PV. Bone repair using the Masquelet technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(11):1024–36. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu L, Xiong Y, Mi B, Panayi AC, Zhou W, Liu Y, Liu J, Xue H, Yan C, Abududilibaier A, Chen L, Liu G. Comparison of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in distal tibial fractures with metaphyseal damage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1037-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li B, Yang Y, Jiang LS. Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing for displaced extra-articular distal tibia fractures: a system review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1362-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu XK, Xu WN, Xue QY, Liang QW. Intramedullary nailing versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2019;11(6):954–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mao Z, Wang G, Zhang L, Zhang L, Chen S, Du H, Zhao Y, Tang P. Intramedullary nailing versus plating for distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0217-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang B, Zhao Y, Wang Q, Hu B, Sun L, Ren C, Li Z, Zhang K, Hao D, Ma T, Lu Y. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1479-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu J, Li L, Wang T, Sheng L, Huo Y, Yin Z, Gu G, He W. Intramedullary nail versus plate treatments for distal tibial fractures: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;16(Pt A):60–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J. Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(7):397–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200408000-00001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kwok CS, Crossman PT, Loizou CL. Plate versus nail for distal tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(9):542–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goh EL, Chidambaram S, Eigenmann D, Ma S, Jones GG. Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nail fixation for closed distal tibial fractures: a meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes. SICOT J. 2018;4:58. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2018055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Joveniaux P, Ohl X, Harisboure A, Berrichi A, Labatut L, Simon P, Mainard D, Vix N, Dehoux E. Distal tibia fractures: management and complications of 101 cases. Int Orthop. 2010;34(4):583–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0832-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fang JH, Wu YS, Guo XS, Sun LJ. Comparison of 3 minimally invasive methods for distal tibia fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;39(4):e627-633. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160606-01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y, Jiang X, Guo Q, Zhu L, Ye T, Chen A. Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study. Int Orthop. 2014;38(6):1261–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2294-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Polat A, Kose O, Canbora K, Yanik S, Guler F. Intramedullary nailing versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal extra-articular tibial fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20(4):695–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0713-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wani IH, Ul Gani N, Yaseen M, Bashir A, Bhat MS, Farooq M. Operative management of distal tibial extra-articular fractures—intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017;19(6):537–41. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.8045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Daolagupu AK, Mudgal A, Agarwala V, Dutta KK. A comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nailing and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in extra articular distal tibial fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51(3):292–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lau TW, Leung F, Chan CF, Chow SP. Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2008;32(5):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0384-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Santolini E, West R, Giannoudis PV. Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 8):S8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30049-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kuhn S, Appelmann P, Pairon P, Mehler D, Rommens PM. The Retrograde Tibial Nail: presentation and biomechanical evaluation of a new concept in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl 1):S81-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne (LUKS), Lucerne, Switzerland

    Nils Jan Bleeker, Nicole M. van Veelen, Bryan J. M. van de Wall, Björn-Christian Link, Reto Babst, Matthias Knobe & Frank J. P. Beeres

  2. Specialized Center of Orthopaedic Research and Education (SCORE), Orthopaedic Department, Xpert Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Inger N. Sierevelt

  3. Department of Health Science and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Reto Babst

Authors
  1. Nils Jan Bleeker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicole M. van Veelen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bryan J. M. van de Wall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Inger N. Sierevelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reto Babst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Matthias Knobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frank J. P. Beeres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that he/she has no conflict of interest in relation with the submitted article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bleeker, N.J., van Veelen, N.M., van de Wall, B.J.M. et al. MIPO vs. intra-medullary nailing for extra-articular distal tibia fractures and the efficacy of intra-operative alignment control: a retrospective cohort of 135 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 3683–3691 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01836-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01836-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation