Skip to main content

High-volume center analysis and systematic review of stump appendicitis: solving the pending issue

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery volume 48, pages 1663–1672 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Stump appendicitis (SA) is a rare long-term complication after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) that can be associated with high morbidity due to delayed diagnosis. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of SA by reviewing our large cohort of LA and performing a systematic review of the literature.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients who developed SA after LA between 2006 and 2020. Demographics, peri-operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and GoogleScholar bibliographic databases was also performed to identify publications regarding SA following LA.

Results

A total of 2,019 patients underwent LA; 5 (0.25%) developed SA after a median of 292 days. The most common symptom at presentation was right lower quadrant pain. Four SA (80%) occurred in patients with a history of complicated appendicitis at index operation. All patients were diagnosed with computed tomography and underwent completion stump appendectomy by laparoscopy. No postoperative complications were recorded. A total of 55 studies with 76 cases of SA after LA were identified in the systematic review. Most SA (98.7%) underwent surgery: 52% by laparoscopic approach and 36% through an open approach. Stump appendectomy was performed in 94.4% cases and an extended resection in 5.6%.

Conclusion

Although SA is a rare complication after LA, a high index of clinical suspicious and imaging studies are key for early diagnosis and treatment. A laparoscopic resection of the inflamed appendiceal stump is feasible, safe, and highly effective. A minority of patients with severe cecum compromise may need extended resections or conversion to open surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perez KS, Allen SR. Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy. JAAPA. 2018;31(9):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000544304.30954.40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanona H, Al Samaraee A, Nice C, Bhattacharya V. Stump appendicitis: a review. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):425–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Subramanian A, Liang MK. A 60-year literature review of stump appendicitis: the need for a critical view. Am J Surg. 2012;203(4):503–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Devereaux DA, McDermott JP, Caushaj PF. Recurrent appendicitis following laparoscopic appendectomy. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(7):719–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054417.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright TE, Diaco JF. Recurrent appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy. Int Surg. 1994;79(3):251–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Filippi Palavesa MM, Vaxmann D, Campos M, Tuchmann C, Guth S, Dietemann JL. Appendiceal stump abscess. Abdom Imaging. 1996;21(1):65–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenberg JJ, Esposito TJ. Appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy: a warning. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996;6(3):185–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/lps.1996.6.185.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Milne AA, Bradbury AW. “Residual” appendicitis following incomplete laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83(2):217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh DC, Roediger WE. Stump appendicitis–a potential problem after laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7(4):357–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chikamori F, Kuniyoshi N, Shibuya S, Takase Y. Appendiceal stump abscess as an early complication of laparoscopic appendectomy: report of a case. Surg Today. 2002;32(10):919–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005950200182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcoen S, Onghena T, Van Loon C, Vereecken L. Residual appendicitis following incomplete laparoscopic appendectomy. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103(5):517–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2003.11679480.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levine CD, Aizenstein O, Wachsberg RH. Pitfalls in the CT diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(921):792–9. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/95663370.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shin LK, Halpern D, Weston SR, Meiner EM, Katz DS. Prospective CT diagnosis of stump appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(3 Suppl):S62–4. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.3_supplement.01840s62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Watkins BP, Kothari SN, Landercasper J. Stump appendicitis: case report and review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14(3):167–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sle.0000129392.75673.97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Topal E, Topal N, Özgüc H. A rare cause of acute abdomen: stump appendicitis. J Emerg Med. 2005;3:1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gifford SM, Bowman J, Perry WB, Richards M. Right lower quadrant pain in a young adult male. Curr Surg. 2006;63(5):318–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL. Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg. 2006;72(2):162–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cases Baldó MJ, Campillo Soto A, Mengual Ballester M, Parlorio de Andrés E, Martínez Gómez D, Aguayo Albasini JL. Apendicitis del muñón apendicular: dos casos clínicos y revisión de la bibliografía [Stump appendicitis: report of two cases an review of literature]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101(7):514–6. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1130-01082009000700017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akkary E, Cramer T, Sadek M, Phan T. Appendicitis after appendectomy? Case report and literature review. W V Med J. 2010;106(7):28–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirza MS. Stump apendicitis a cautionary tale of apendicitis after appendectomy. South Afrian J Surg. 2010;48(2):70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Parameshwarappa S, Rodrigues G, Prabhu R, Sambhaji C. Stump appendicitis following laparoscopic appendectomy. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2011;11(1):112–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Romesburg J, Imam K. Stump appendicitis. Appl Radiol. 2010;39:36–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Mansour M, Watch L. Granulomatous stump appendicitis mimicking Crohn’s disease. Am Surg. 2011;77(8):172–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bu-Ali O, Al-Bashir M, Samir HA, Abu-Zidan FM. Stump appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy: case report. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011;17(3):267–8. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2011.47123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen YL, Chang WC, Huang GS, Ko KH. Recurrent appendicitis after appendectomy. QJM. 2012;105(8):805–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcr143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts KE, Starker LF, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Bokhari J. Stump appendicitis: a surgeon’s dilemma. JSLS. 2011;15(3):373–8. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680811X13125733356954.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sreeramulu PN, Nikhil SS, Mahesh BB. Stump appendicitis: a bane or boon of laparoscopic appendectomy. WJLS. 2011;4(1):5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Von Eineme G, Denecke T, Grieser D. Stump appendicitis: does it occur more frequently after laparoscopic of conventional appendectomy? Report of a case. The Open Surg J. 2011;5:19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Buttrick SS, Choi JJ, Divino CM. Stump appendicitis after open and laparoscopic appendectomies. Am Surg. 2012;78(1):143–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leff DR, Sait MR, Hanief M, Salakianathan S, Darzi AW, Vashisht R. Inflammation of the residual appendix stump: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(3):282–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02487.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Agic M, DeliBegovic S. Stump appendicitis following laparoscopic appendectomy. BH Surg. 2013;3(1):58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Awe JA, Soliman AM, Gourdie RW. Stump appendicitis: an uncompleted surgery, a rare but important entity with potential problems. Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:972596. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/972596.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar A, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Chowbey PK. Stump appendicitis: a rare clinical entity. J Minim Access Surg. 2013;9(4):173–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.118835.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mínguez G, Gonzalo R, Tamargo A, Turienzo E, Mesa A, Vazquez L. An unsuspected clinical condition: appendicitis of appendicular residual, three cases report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4(4):371–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.01.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bednar F, Skiba J, Mallat AF, Napolitano LM. Stump appendicitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15(4):460–1. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Constantin V, Popa F, Carâp A, Socea B. Stump appendicitis - an overlooked clinical entity. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2014;109(1):128–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Irvine SD, Neltner KA, Shellman-White SA, Zimmer BL. The case files: a diagnostic pitfall: stump appendicitis. Emerg Med News. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.EEM.0000452784.05775.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Johnston J, Myers DT, Williams TR. Stump appendicitis: surgical background, CT appearance, and imaging mimics. Emerg Radiol. 2015;22(1):13–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1253-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Çiftci F, Abdurrahman I, Tatar Z. Stump appendicitis: a clinical enigma. Chirurgia. 2015;110(6):562–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cobb W, Keeler B, Aris Chandran J, Soin B. Recurrent right iliac fossa pain in patients with previous appendicectomy. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:2014207971. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-207971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Parra-Fariñas C, Castellá E. Stump appendicitis: a forgotten diagnosis. 2015. Eurorad. https://doi.org/10.1594/eurorad/case.12710.

  44. Hendahewa R, Shekhar A, Ratnayake S. The dilemma of stump appendicitis - a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;14:101–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.07.017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Morales-García D, Castañera-González R, González-Sánchez FJ, González-Noriega M, Alonso-Martín J, Gómez-Fleitas M. Stump appendicitis. Underrated reality? Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015;107(7):461–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wani MR, Lanker JM, Reddy PK. Stump appendicitis: a diagnostic dilemma. Apollo Med. 2015;12(2):135–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Maurice AP, Ibrahim H, Franz R, Iswariah H. Stump appendicitis 5 years after laparoscopic appendicectomy. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2016217022. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-217022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ünlüer EE, Karagöz A, Şahin Y, Bilgin S, Oyar O. Diagnostic challenges with stump appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(6):1188.e1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Nadeem K, Jacob MO, Jacob O. Out of sight, out of mind: perforated distal stump appendicitis. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(5):E210–1. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Safar A, Al-Aqueeli A, Al-Mass A, Al-Shaban B. Post-appendectomy appendicitis: a case report. Int J Case Rep Images. 2017;8(9):597–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Rhyne RR, Hale AL, Watson DS, Smith DE. Stump appendicitis management. Am Surg. 2018;84(12):519–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Balogun OS, Osinowo AO, Makanjuola AA, Nwokocha SO. Stump appendicitis due to retained fecalith after laparoscopic surgery. Niger Med J. 2019;60(2):92–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/nmj.NMJ_39_19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Boardman TJ, Musisca NJ. Recurrent appendicitis caused by a retained appendiceal tip: a case report. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(2):232–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.03.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Choi H, Choi YJ, Lee TG, Kim DH, Choi JW, Ryu DH. Laparoscopic management for stump appendicitis: a case series with literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(47):e18072. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Aslan S, Özek MC. A rare cause of acute abdomen: stump appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy. South Clin Ist Euras. 2020;31(2):184–6.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cantore F, Lovotti D, Raveglia V, Caronno R, David G. Right retroperitoneal abscess or recurrent appendicitis? (abstract). Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:337–388.

  57. Khan IA, Ramakrishnan P, Subbaiah R, et al. Stump appendicitis single centre experience: a retrospective study. Int Surg J. 2020;7:1899–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mejri A, Arfaoui K, Aloui B. Stump appendicitis: a myth that can become reality. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;12(36):274. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.274.24690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Mizuta N, Nakanishi T, Tsunemi K. Stump appendicitis occurred two and half years after first laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess: a report of a case. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020;67:146–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.01.033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Thakur UK, Tandup C, Kaman L, Sharma S, Gulati A, Rana P. Stump appendicitis - an underreported complication of appendectomy? Clin Surg. 2020;5:2960.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rose T. Recurrent appendiceal abscess. Med J Aust. 1945;32:65962.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Dikicier E, Altintoprak F, Ozdemir K, Gundogdu K, Uzunoglu MY, Cakmak G, Onuray F, Capoglu R. Stump appendicitis: a retrospective review of 3130 consecutive appendectomy cases. World J Emerg Surg. 2018;24(13):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0182-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mangi AA, Berger DL. Stump appendicitis. Am Surg. 2000;66(8):739–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gasmi M, Fitouri F, Sahli S, Jemaï R, Hamzaoui M. A stump appendicitis in a child: a case report. Ital J Pediatr. 2009;35(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1824-7288-35-35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Manatakis DK, Aheimastos V, Antonopoulou MI, Agalianos C, Tsiaoussis J, Xynos E. Unfinished business: a systematic review of stump appendicitis. World J Surg. 2019;43(11):2756–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05101-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Papi S, Pecchini F, Gelmini R. Stump appendicitis: a rare and unusual complication after appendectomy. Case report and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir. 2014;85(Epub4):S2239253X14022270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Uludag M, Isgor A, Basak M. Stump appendicitis is a rare delayed complication of appendectomy: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(33):5401–3. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i33.5401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Al-Dabbagh AK, Thomas NB, Haboubi N. Stump appendicitis. A diagnostic dilemma. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13(1):73–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0419-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Baldisserotto M, Cavazzola S, Cavazzola LT, Lopes MH, Mottin CC. Acute edematous stump appendicitis diagnosed preoperatively on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(2):503–4. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750503.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rao PM, Sagarin MJ, McCabe CJ. Stump appendicitis diagnosed preoperatively by computed tomography. Am J Emerg Med. 1998;16(3):309–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-6757(98)90110-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Geraci G, Lena A, D’Orazio B, Cudia B, Rizzuto S, Modica G. A rare clinical entity: stump appendicitis. Case report and complete review of literature. Clin Ter. 2019;170(6):e409–17. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2019.2167.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mannu GS, Sudul MK, Bettencourt-Silva JH, Cumber E, Li F, Clark AB, Loke YK. Closure methods of the appendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):CD006437. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006437.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Ceresoli M, Tamini N, Gianotti L, Braga M, Nespoli L. Are endoscopic loop ties safe even in complicated acute appendicitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019;68:40–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. van Rossem CC, van Geloven AA, Schreinemacher MH, Bemelman WA; snapshot appendicitis collaborative study group. Endoloops or endostapler use in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis: no difference in infectious complications. Surg Endosc. 2017;1(1):178–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4951-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ismail I, Iusco D, Jannaci M, Navarra GG, Grassi A, Bonomi S, Parpanesi R, Giombi A, Virzì S. Prompt recognition of stump appendicitis is important to avoid serious complications: a case report. Cases J. 2009;9(2):7415. https://doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-7415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Haller F, Gasche C. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: new approach in the treatment of stump appendicitis. Endoscopy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1346-8677.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Durgun AV, Baca B, Ersoy Y, Kapan M. Stump appendicitis and generalized peritonitis due to incomplete appendectomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7(2):102–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-003-0018-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Aschkenasy MT, Rybicki FJ. Acute appendicitis of the appendiceal stump. J Emerg Med. 2005;28(1):41–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2004.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Roche-Nagle G, Gallagher C, Kilgallen C, Caldwell M. Stump appendicitis: a rare but important entity. Surgeon. 2005;3(1):53–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80015-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredon 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    María A. Casas, Nicolás H. Dreifuss & Francisco Schlottmann

Authors
  1. María A. Casas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolás H. Dreifuss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francisco Schlottmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: MAC, NHD and FS. Data acquisition: MAC, NHD and FS. Analysis and interpretation of data: MAC, NHD and FS. Drafting of the manuscript: MAC, NHD and FS. Critical revision of manuscript: MAC, NHD and FS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Schlottmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Maria A. Casas, Nicolás H. Dreifuss and Francisco Schlottmann has no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

The institutional review board (IRB) approved this study. Written informed consent was waived by the IRB owing to the study’s retrospective nature.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casas, M.A., Dreifuss, N.H. & Schlottmann, F. High-volume center analysis and systematic review of stump appendicitis: solving the pending issue. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 1663–1672 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01707-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01707-y

Keywords

  • Stump appendicitis
  • Acute appendicitis
  • Laparoscopy
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy