Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day survival of nonagenarian patients who underwent non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgery. Other aims were: 90-day and 12-month survival rates, the postoperative complications rate, the impact of the emergency operation on postoperative functional status, the accuracy of the P-POSSUM in predicting 30-day postoperative mortality and changes in care services after surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of nonagenarian patients who underwent non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgery between January 2010 and June 2017. Patients were divided in two groups according to the 30-day survival status to compare the distribution of patients’ characteristics and postoperative outcomes. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. To assess the accuracy of P-POSSUM to predict 30-day mortality, a receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test were used.

Results

85 nonagenarian patients were enrolled in this study; of these, 27 (31.8%) died within 30 days. The Kaplan–Meier curve showed a rapid decline in survival over the first 30 postoperative days, followed by a more gradual reduction during the rest of the first year. The majority of patients (92.6%) who died within 30 days experienced a medical complication, with a preponderance of respiratory failure (48.2%) and multiple organ failure (33.3%). In the surviving patients, the postoperative functional status had worsened, and 64.2% of patients did not return to their original housing situation or were institutionalized. The accuracy of P-POSSUM in predicting 30-day mortality in nonagenarian patients was poor.

Conclusions

This study may help doctors convey the postoperative risks of morbidity and mortality, and also to adequately inform relatives about the possible adverse discharge destination of surviving nonagenarian patients with a consequent increase in care needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Kotzeva M. Demographic changes—profile of the population. In: Kotzeva M, editor. People in the EU: who are we and how do we live? Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. p. 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(6):865–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelavski AD, De Miguel M, Rochera MI, Lacasta A, Roca M. Immediate postoperative and mid-term survival in nonagenarians undergoing non-traumatic emergency surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80(7):796–804.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system. Br J Surg. 1996;83(6):812–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliver CM, Walker E, Giannaris S, Grocott MP, Moonesinghe SR. Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(6):849–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loc PTB, du Montcel ST, Duron JJ, Levard H, Suc B, Descottes B, et al. Elderly POSSUM, a dedicated score for prediction of mortality and morbidity after major colorectal surgery in older patients. Br J Surg. 2010;97(3):396–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomes A, Rocha R, Marinho R, Sousa M, Pignatelli N, Carneiro C, et al. Colorectal surgical mortality and morbidity in elderly patients: comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, CR-POSSUM, and CR-BHOM. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30(2):173–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-2071-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, Pederson T, Bradshaw PT, Mulrow CD, et al. Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(5):762–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.05.280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970;10(1):20–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newgard CD, Lewis RJ. Missing data: how to best account for what is not known. JAMA. 2015;314(9):940–1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Racz J, Dubois L, Katchky A, Wall W. Elective and emergency abdominal surgery in patients 90 years of age or older. Can J Surg. 2012;55(5):322–8. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.007611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Aucoin S, McIsaac DI. Emergency general surgery in older adults: a review. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;37(3):493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anclin.2019.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Corcoran T, Rhodes JE, Clarke S, Myles PS, Ho KM. Perioperative fluid management strategies in major surgery: a stratified meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(3):640–51. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318240d6eb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(4):622–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aef220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berian JR, Mohanty S, Ko CY, Rosenthal RA, Robinson TN. Association of loss of independence with readmission and death after discharge in older patients after surgical procedures. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):e161689. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudlow A, Tuffaha H, Stearns AT, Shaikh IA. Outcomes of surgery in patients aged >/=90 years in the general surgical setting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(3):172–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MP, LB, and PC: conception and design; AF, PA, ADT, and GS: acquisition of data; MP, GV, and SS: analysis and interpretation of data; MP, LB, and PC: drafting the article; ADT, GV, SS, AF, PA, and GS: critical revision of the article; MP, LB, ADT, GV, SS, AF, PA, GS, and PC: final approval of the version; MP, LB, ADT, GV, SS, AF, PA, GS, and PC: agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattia Portinari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest/competing interests.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University Hospital of Ferrara (Ethical Committee for Human Subject Research Study Number: CE-AVEC 87/2018/Oss/AOUFe).

Consent to participate

Patients still alive and available signed a written informed consent, while a consent waiver was approved by the ethics committee for deceased and unavailable patients.

Consent for publication

Patients still alive and available signed a written informed consent, while a consent waiver was approved by the ethics committee for deceased and unavailable patients.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Portinari, M., Bianchi, L., De Troia, A. et al. Non-traumatic emergency abdominal surgery in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 1205–1216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01646-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01646-8

Keywords

Navigation