Abstract
Introduction
3D-printing technology has become very popular the last 10 years, and their advantages have been widely proved. However, its safety in the operating room after sterilization has not been evaluated. Thus, the use of 3D printing is still questioned. The aim of this work is to evaluate the security of polylactic acid (PLA) to print surgical models after its sterilization.
Materials and methods
One hundred and eighty-six PLA plates and 6 negative controls without microorganisms were seeded. After 10 days of culture, the PLA plates were randomized into three groups: A, B, and C. Group A underwent a sterilization process using an autoclave program at 134 °C. Group B was seeded in different culture media and group C was used to make crystal violet stains on the biofilms formed on the PLA. Mechanical properties of PLA after autoclave sterilization including, the breaking load, deformation and breaking load per surface were calculated.
Results
Hundred percent of the group B showed monomicrobial growth. Stains performed on group C PLA showed biofilms in all PLA pieces. After sterilization, no pathogen growth was observed in group A during the culture observation period showing 100% sterilization effectiveness. A filling percentage of 5% obtained a breaking load of 6.36 MPa, and its elastic limit occurred after an elongation of 167.4%. A 10% infill was mechanically safe.
Conclusions
Autoclave sterilization of PLA-printed pieces is safe for the patient and mechanically strong for the surgeon. This is the first 3D-printing protocol described and evaluated to implement 3D-printing technology safely in the operating room.
Significance and impact of study
This is the first 3D-printing protocol described to print and sterilize 3D biomodels using an autoclave showing its biological safety and its mechanical resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woo Seong-hwan, Sung Myung-jin, Park Kyung-soon, Yoon Taek-rim. Three-dimensional-printing Technology in Hip and Pelvic Surgery: current Landscape. Hip & pelvis. 2020;32(1):1.
Duan X, Fan H, Wang F, He P, Yang L. Application of 3D-printed customized guides in subtalar joint arthrodesis. Orthopaed Surg. 2019;11(3):405–13.
Fang C, Cai H, Kuong E, Chui E, Siu YC, Ji T, et al. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants. Unfallchirurg. 2019;122(4):278–85.
Sun S. PhD, Chou Y, Sue C, Full-Scale 3D preoperative planning system for calcaneal osteotomy with a multimedia system. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(5):528–39.
Zheng W, Tao Z, Lou Y, Feng Z, Li H, Cheng L, et al. Comparison of the conventional surgery and the surgery assisted by 3d printing technology in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. J Invest Surg. 2017;31(6):557–67.
Zhang Y, Xiao X, Xiao Y, Chen X, Zhang S, Deng L. Efficacy and prognosis of 3D printing technology in treatment of high-energy trans-syndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation—”log-splitter” injury. Medical Sci Monitor. 2019;25:4233–43.
Zhang Y, Wu R, Xie D, Zhang L, He Y, Zhang H. Effect of 3D printing technology on pelvic fractures:a Meta-analysis. Zhongguo gu Shang. 2018;31(5):465.
Bizzotto N, Tami I, Santucci A, Adani R, Poggi P, Romani D, et al. 3D Printed replica of articular fractures for surgical planning and patient consent: a two years multi-centric experience. 3D Print Med. 2016;2(1):1–6.
Wu W, Xu W, Wan C, Fang M. Preoperative plan with 3D printing in internal and external fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. Orthopaed Surg. 2019;11(4):560–8.
You W, Liu LJ, Chen HX, Xiong JY, Wang DM, Huang JH, et al. Application of 3D printing technology on the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (Neer3-part and 4-part) in old people. Orthopaed Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(7):897–903.
Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115.
Auricchio F, Marconi S. 3D printing: clinical applications in orthopaedics and traumatology. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1(5):121–7.
Zheng W, Su J, Cai L, Lou Y, Wang J, Guo X, et al. Application of 3D-printing technology in the treatment of humeral intercondylar fractures. Orthopaed Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1):83–8.
Wang Q, Hu J, Guan J, Chen Y, Wang L. Proximal third humeral shaft fractures fixed with long helical PHILOS plates in elderly patients: benefit of pre-contouring plates on a 3D-printed model—a retrospective study. J Orthopaed Surg Res. 2018;13(1):203.
Xie L, Chen C, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Chen H, Cai L. Three-dimensional printing assisted ORIF versus conventional ORIF for tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;57:35–44.
Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;473(1):151–8.
Huijbregts HJTAM, Khan RJK, Fick DP, Hall MJ, Punwar SA, Sorensen E, et al. Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J. 2016;98(8):1043–9.
Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, Ollivier M, Le Corroller T, Argenson J. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2213–9.
Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(2):159–61.
Chee Kai Chua. Rapid prototyping: principles and applications. Singapore: World Scientific; 2010. p. 124.
Pubmed MyNCBI filters “3d printing”.
Bose S, Traxel KD, Vu AA, Bandyopadhyay A. Clinical significance of three-dimensional printed biomaterials and biomedical devices. MRS Bull. 2019;44(6):494–504.
Liu S, Wu G, Chen X, Zhang X, Yu J, Liu M, et al. Degradation behavior in vitro of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) Composite Suture. Polymers. 2019;11(6):1015.
Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV. Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127(6):1612–26.
Liu S, Yu J, Li H, Wang K, Wu G, Wang B, et al. Controllable drug release behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) surgical suture coating with ciprofloxacin (CPFX)-polycaprolactone (PCL)/polyglycolide (PGA). Polymers. 2020;12(2):288.
Tyler B, Gullotti D, Mangraviti A, Utsuki T, Brem H. Polylactic acid (PLA) controlled delivery carriers for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:163–75.
Shintani H. Ethylene oxide gas sterilization of medical devices. Biocontrol Sci. 2017;22(1):1–16.
Shaheen E, Alhelwani A, Van De Casteele E, Politis C, Jacobs R. Evaluation of dimensional changes of 3D printed models after sterilization: a pilot study. Open Dentistr J. 2018;12(1):72–9.
Hedayati R, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured octagonal honeycombs. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2016;69:1307–17.
Boursier J, Fournet A, Bassanino J, Manassero M, Bedu A, Leperlier D. Reproducibility, accuracy and effect of autoclave sterilization on a thermoplastic three-dimensional model printed by a desktop fused deposition modelling three-dimensional printer. Vet Comparat Orthopaed Traumatol. 2018;31(6):422–30.
Ferràs-Tarragó J, Jordà-Gómez P, Català-de-las-Marinas J, Antequera-Cano JM, Barrés-Carsí M. A new universal 3D-printable device to prevent excessive drilling in orthopedic surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01465-3.
Standau T, Long H, Murillo Castellón S, Brütting C, Bonten C, Altstädt V. Evaluation of the zero shear viscosity, the D-content and processing conditions as foam relevant parameters for autoclave foaming of standard polylactide (PLA). Materials. 2020;13(6):1371.
Zolfagharian A, Khosravani MR, Kaynak A. Fracture resistance analysis of 3D-printed polymers. Polymers. 2020;12(2):302.
Török G, Gombocz P, Bognár E, Nagy P, Dinya E, Kispélyi B, et al. Effects of disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for implant therapy—pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):19.
Funding
Spanish Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. Investigation grant 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F-TJ: development of the idea and 3D-printed samples. S-BO, S-AJM: cultures and sterilization evaluation. A-SM: statistical analyses. A-VJ, DCC: evaluation of the results and critical analysis. B-GF: biomechanical analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferràs-Tarragó, J., Sabalza-Baztán, O., Sahuquillo-Arce, J.M. et al. Security of 3D-printed polylactide acid piece sterilization in the operating room: a sterility test. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 3895–3900 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01564-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01564-1