Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Security of 3D-printed polylactide acid piece sterilization in the operating room: a sterility test

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

3D-printing technology has become very popular the last 10 years, and their advantages have been widely proved. However, its safety in the operating room after sterilization has not been evaluated. Thus, the use of 3D printing is still questioned. The aim of this work is to evaluate the security of polylactic acid (PLA) to print surgical models after its sterilization.

Materials and methods

One hundred and eighty-six PLA plates and 6 negative controls without microorganisms were seeded. After 10 days of culture, the PLA plates were randomized into three groups: A, B, and C. Group A underwent a sterilization process using an autoclave program at 134 °C. Group B was seeded in different culture media and group C was used to make crystal violet stains on the biofilms formed on the PLA. Mechanical properties of PLA after autoclave sterilization including, the breaking load, deformation and breaking load per surface were calculated.

Results

Hundred percent of the group B showed monomicrobial growth. Stains performed on group C PLA showed biofilms in all PLA pieces. After sterilization, no pathogen growth was observed in group A during the culture observation period showing 100% sterilization effectiveness. A filling percentage of 5% obtained a breaking load of 6.36 MPa, and its elastic limit occurred after an elongation of 167.4%. A 10% infill was mechanically safe.

Conclusions

Autoclave sterilization of PLA-printed pieces is safe for the patient and mechanically strong for the surgeon. This is the first 3D-printing protocol described and evaluated to implement 3D-printing technology safely in the operating room.

Significance and impact of study

This is the first 3D-printing protocol described to print and sterilize 3D biomodels using an autoclave showing its biological safety and its mechanical resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woo Seong-hwan, Sung Myung-jin, Park Kyung-soon, Yoon Taek-rim. Three-dimensional-printing Technology in Hip and Pelvic Surgery: current Landscape. Hip & pelvis. 2020;32(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duan X, Fan H, Wang F, He P, Yang L. Application of 3D-printed customized guides in subtalar joint arthrodesis. Orthopaed Surg. 2019;11(3):405–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fang C, Cai H, Kuong E, Chui E, Siu YC, Ji T, et al. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants. Unfallchirurg. 2019;122(4):278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun S. PhD, Chou Y, Sue C, Full-Scale 3D preoperative planning system for calcaneal osteotomy with a multimedia system. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(5):528–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zheng W, Tao Z, Lou Y, Feng Z, Li H, Cheng L, et al. Comparison of the conventional surgery and the surgery assisted by 3d printing technology in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. J Invest Surg. 2017;31(6):557–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Xiao X, Xiao Y, Chen X, Zhang S, Deng L. Efficacy and prognosis of 3D printing technology in treatment of high-energy trans-syndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation—”log-splitter” injury. Medical Sci Monitor. 2019;25:4233–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y, Wu R, Xie D, Zhang L, He Y, Zhang H. Effect of 3D printing technology on pelvic fractures:a Meta-analysis. Zhongguo gu Shang. 2018;31(5):465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bizzotto N, Tami I, Santucci A, Adani R, Poggi P, Romani D, et al. 3D Printed replica of articular fractures for surgical planning and patient consent: a two years multi-centric experience. 3D Print Med. 2016;2(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu W, Xu W, Wan C, Fang M. Preoperative plan with 3D printing in internal and external fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. Orthopaed Surg. 2019;11(4):560–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. You W, Liu LJ, Chen HX, Xiong JY, Wang DM, Huang JH, et al. Application of 3D printing technology on the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures (Neer3-part and 4-part) in old people. Orthopaed Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(7):897–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, Annemans L. 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Auricchio F, Marconi S. 3D printing: clinical applications in orthopaedics and traumatology. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1(5):121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zheng W, Su J, Cai L, Lou Y, Wang J, Guo X, et al. Application of 3D-printing technology in the treatment of humeral intercondylar fractures. Orthopaed Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1):83–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Q, Hu J, Guan J, Chen Y, Wang L. Proximal third humeral shaft fractures fixed with long helical PHILOS plates in elderly patients: benefit of pre-contouring plates on a 3D-printed model—a retrospective study. J Orthopaed Surg Res. 2018;13(1):203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie L, Chen C, Zhang Y, Zheng W, Chen H, Cai L. Three-dimensional printing assisted ORIF versus conventional ORIF for tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;57:35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sassoon A, Nam D, Nunley R, Barrack R. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;473(1):151–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huijbregts HJTAM, Khan RJK, Fick DP, Hall MJ, Punwar SA, Sorensen E, et al. Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J. 2016;98(8):1043–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, Ollivier M, Le Corroller T, Argenson J. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2213–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(2):159–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chee Kai Chua. Rapid prototyping: principles and applications. Singapore: World Scientific; 2010. p. 124.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Pubmed MyNCBI filters “3d printing”.

  22. Bose S, Traxel KD, Vu AA, Bandyopadhyay A. Clinical significance of three-dimensional printed biomaterials and biomedical devices. MRS Bull. 2019;44(6):494–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu S, Wu G, Chen X, Zhang X, Yu J, Liu M, et al. Degradation behavior in vitro of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) Composite Suture. Polymers. 2019;11(6):1015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV. Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127(6):1612–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu S, Yu J, Li H, Wang K, Wu G, Wang B, et al. Controllable drug release behavior of polylactic acid (PLA) surgical suture coating with ciprofloxacin (CPFX)-polycaprolactone (PCL)/polyglycolide (PGA). Polymers. 2020;12(2):288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tyler B, Gullotti D, Mangraviti A, Utsuki T, Brem H. Polylactic acid (PLA) controlled delivery carriers for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:163–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shintani H. Ethylene oxide gas sterilization of medical devices. Biocontrol Sci. 2017;22(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaheen E, Alhelwani A, Van De Casteele E, Politis C, Jacobs R. Evaluation of dimensional changes of 3D printed models after sterilization: a pilot study. Open Dentistr J. 2018;12(1):72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hedayati R, Sadighi M, Mohammadi-Aghdam M, Zadpoor AA. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured octagonal honeycombs. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2016;69:1307–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Boursier J, Fournet A, Bassanino J, Manassero M, Bedu A, Leperlier D. Reproducibility, accuracy and effect of autoclave sterilization on a thermoplastic three-dimensional model printed by a desktop fused deposition modelling three-dimensional printer. Vet Comparat Orthopaed Traumatol. 2018;31(6):422–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ferràs-Tarragó J, Jordà-Gómez P, Català-de-las-Marinas J, Antequera-Cano JM, Barrés-Carsí M. A new universal 3D-printable device to prevent excessive drilling in orthopedic surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01465-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Standau T, Long H, Murillo Castellón S, Brütting C, Bonten C, Altstädt V. Evaluation of the zero shear viscosity, the D-content and processing conditions as foam relevant parameters for autoclave foaming of standard polylactide (PLA). Materials. 2020;13(6):1371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zolfagharian A, Khosravani MR, Kaynak A. Fracture resistance analysis of 3D-printed polymers. Polymers. 2020;12(2):302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Török G, Gombocz P, Bognár E, Nagy P, Dinya E, Kispélyi B, et al. Effects of disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for implant therapy—pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Spanish Society of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. Investigation grant 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F-TJ: development of the idea and 3D-printed samples. S-BO, S-AJM: cultures and sterilization evaluation. A-SM: statistical analyses. A-VJ, DCC: evaluation of the results and critical analysis. B-GF: biomechanical analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Ferràs-Tarragó.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferràs-Tarragó, J., Sabalza-Baztán, O., Sahuquillo-Arce, J.M. et al. Security of 3D-printed polylactide acid piece sterilization in the operating room: a sterility test. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 3895–3900 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01564-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01564-1

Keywords

Navigation