Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing tube thoracostomy with thoracic ultrasound: results from a randomized pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Tube thoracostomy (TT) is a simple and a life-saving procedure; nevertheless, it carries morbidity, even after its removal. Currently, TT is managed and removed by chest X-ray (CXR) evaluation. There are limitations and these are directly linked to complications. The use of thoracic ultrasound (US) has already been established in the diagnosis of pneumothorax (PTX) and hemothorax (HTX); its use, in substitution of CXR can lead to improvement in care. Our aim is to evaluate the efficiency and safety of US in the management of TT.

Methods

Prospective and randomized study with patients requiring TT. They were divided in groups according to their thoracic injuries (PTX and HTX) and randomized into two groups according to TT management: US and CXR. Data collected included gender, age, mechanism of injury, days to TT removal, complications after TT removal and presence of mechanical ventilation.

Results

Sixty-one patients were randomized, of which 68.8% were male. The most frequent diagnosis was PTX, present in 37 cases. Median time for TT removal was 2.5 days in the US group and 4.9 in the control group (p = 0.009). The complication rate was 6.6%, with no morbidity in the US group. TT removal in patients with mechanical ventilation did not increase the incidence of complications.

Conclusions

The use of US in the management is efficient and safe. It allows early TT removal regardless the cause of the thoracic injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Satoh Y. Management of chest drainage tubes after lung surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64(6):305–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-016-0646-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin M, Haan P, Kopari N, et al. Results of a clinical practice algorithm for the management of thoracostomy tubes placed for traumatic mechanism. Springerplus. 2013;2(1):642. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwan RO, Miraflor E, Yeung L, et al. The impact of a chest tube management protocol on the outcome of trauma patients with tube thoracostomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;78(2):45–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912015004007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwan RO, Miraflor E, Yeung L, Strumwasser A, Victorino GP. Bedside thoracic ultrasonography of the fourth intercostal space reliably determines safe removal of tube thoracostomy after traumatic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1570–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318265fc22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanoue LT. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. Yearb Pulm Dis. 2012;2009:154–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3452(08)79173-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Staub LJ, Biscaro RRM, Kaszubowski E, Maurici R. Chest ultrasonography for the emergency diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax and haemothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury. 2018;49(3):457–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Menegozzo CAM, Utiyama EM. Steering the wheel towards the standard of care: proposal of a step-by-step ultrasound-guided emergency chest tube drainage and literature review. Int J Surg. 2018;56:315–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adhikari S, Blaivas M. History, progress, and future of emergency ultrasound. Ultrasound Clin. 2014;9(2):119–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cult.2014.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kugler NW, Milia DJ, Carver TW, O’Connell K, Paul J. Natural history of a postpull pneumothorax or effusion: observation is safe. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):391. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins J, Gharahbaghian L, Doniger S, et al. Sonographic identification of tube thoracostomy study (SITTS): confirmation of intrathoracic placement. West J Emerg Med. 2013;13(4):305–11. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.10.6680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez MC, Zeb MH, Heller SF, Zielinski MD, Aho JM. Tube thoracostomy complications increase cost. World J Surg. 2017;41(6):1482–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3897-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao M, Hughes R, Papadimos TJ, Stawicki SP. Complications of chest tubes: a focused clinical synopsis. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2015;21(4):376–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu H, Isaacson AJ, Burke CT. Management of traumatic hemothorax, retained hemothorax, and other thoracic collections. Curr Trauma Rep. 2017;3(3):181–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-017-0101-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ianniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B, Miele V. First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Radiol Med. 2014;119(9):674–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0384-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soult MC, Collins JN, Novosel TJ, Weireter LJ, Britt LD. Thoracic ultrasound can predict safe removal of thoracostomy tubes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(2):256–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karagöz A, Ünlüer EE, Akçay O, Kadioǧlu E. Effectiveness of bedside lung ultrasound for clinical follow-up of primary spontaneous pneumothorax patients treated with tube thoracostomy. Ultrasound Q. 2018;34(4):226–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salamonsen M, Dobeli K, McGrath D, et al. Physician-performed ultrasound can accurately screen for a vulnerable intercostal artery prior to chest drainage procedures. Respirology. 2013;18(6):942–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12088.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lavingia KS, Soult MC, Collins JN, Novosel TJ, Weireter LJ, Britt LD. Basic ultrasound training can replace chest radiography for safe tube thoracostomy removal. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):783–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bozzay JDBM. Management of post-traumatic retained hemothorax. Trauma. 2019;21(1):14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hernandez MC, Laan DV, Zimmerman SL, Naik ND, Schiller HJ, Aho JM. Tube thoracostomy: increased angle of insertion is associated with complications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(2):366–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001098.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Paydar S, Ghahramani Z, Ghoddusi Johari H, et al. Tube thoracostomy (chest tube) removal in traumatic patients: What Do We Know? What Can We Do? Bull Emerg trauma. 2015;3(2):37–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tawil I, Gonda JM, King RD, Marinaro JL, Crandall CS. Impact of positive pressure ventilation on thoracostomy tube removal. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5973c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abbasi HR, Farrokhnia F, Sefidbakht S, Paydar S, Bolandparvaz S. Chest tube removal time in trauma patients on positive ventilation pressure: a randomized clinical trial. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2013;1(1):17–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Menger R, Telford G, Kim P, et al. Complications following thoracic trauma managed with tube thoracostomy. Injury. 2012;43(1):46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chung MJ, Goo JM, Im JG, et al. Value of high-resolution ultrasound in detecting a pneumothorax. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:930–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakitende D, Gottlieb M, Ruskis J, Kimball D, Christian E, Bailitz J. Ultrasound for confirmation of thoracostomy tube placement by emergency medicine residents. Trauma. 2017;19(1):35–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There are no sources of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AZF, EK, JW and MAFRJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AZF and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Zanchenko Fonseca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Registration number: RBR-9hg244 (www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fonseca, A.Z., Kunizaki, E., Waisberg, J. et al. Managing tube thoracostomy with thoracic ultrasound: results from a randomized pilot study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 48, 973–979 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01554-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01554-3

Keywords

Navigation