The cut-out of the cephalomedullary nail is among the most common post-surgery complications for intertrochanteric fractures. As a risk predictor, a tip-apex distance (TAD) below 25 mm, observed from orthogonal fluoroscopic views, is recommended in the literature. This study aims to demonstrate that TAD < 25 mm is a mathematically insufficient risk definition and to complement the TAD upper bound with an appropriate lower bound, with the introduction of a novel distance parameter, TADX, based on the orthogonal projection of the nail tip on the central femoral midline.
Through a mathematical simulation software, all the possible points that lie inside the AP and lateral views of the proximal femoral hemisphere are utilized to create a 3D grid that is sorted into geometrically safe and risk-bearing regions. Extending this methodology, TAD < 25 mm, 10 mm < TAD < 25 mm, and the ideal tip position volumes are simulated. Finally, intersection volumes are created by a combination of different candidate lower TADX bounds and TAD < 25 mm upper bound to determine satisfactory TADX limits.
Simulation of TAD-bound zones exposed that TAD is only a mathematically suitable parameter for defining the upper boundary but not the lower boundary for the optimal region. However, using a TADX lower limit creates a 3D volume that is much closer to the optimal tip region volumetrically and can still be as quickly calculated from 2D AP and lateral views.
According to the mathematical simulations, the use of a TADX lower bound of 9 mm for small, 7.5 mm for medium, and 7 mm for large femoral heads in conjunction with a TAD upper bound of 25 mm is suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Available upon request.
Iskrant AP. The classic: the etiology of fractured hips in females. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:1731–5.
Keene G, Parker M, Pryor G. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ. 1993;307:1248–50.
Nishiura T, Nozawa M, Morio H. The new technique of precise insertion of lag screw in an operative treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures with a short intramedullary nail. Injury. 2009;40:1077–83.
Baumgaertner MR, Solberg BD. Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg. 1997;79:969–71.
Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. Critical factors in cut-out complication after gamma nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1–9.
Güven M, Yavuz U, Kadioǧlu B, Akman B, Kilinçoǧlu V, Ünay K, Altıntaş F. Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw. Rev Chir Orthop Traumatol. 2010;96:33–4.
Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058–64.
Wright D, Whyne C, Hardisty M, Kreder HJ, Lubovsky O. Functional and anatomic orientation of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:2583–9.
Heffernan MJ, Snyder B, Zhou H, Li X. Fluoroscopic imaging overestimates the screw tip to subchondral bone distance in a cadaveric model of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Child Orthrop. 2017;11:36–41.
Rubio-Avila J, Madden K, Simunovic N, Bhandari M. Tip to apex distance in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18:592–8.
Mingo-Robinet J, Torres-Torres M, Martínez-Cervell C, Alonso Del Olmo JA, Rivas Laso JA, Aguado-Hernández H, Burón-Alvarez I. Comparative study of the second and third generation of gamma nail for trochanteric fractures: review of 218 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:e85–90.
Goffin JM, Jenkins PJ, Ramaesh R, Pankaj P, Simpson AH. What Is the relevance of the tip-apex distance as a predictor of lag screw cut-out? PLoS ONE. 2013;8:4–11.
Pervez H, Parker MJ, Vowler S. Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation. Injury. 2004;35:994–8.
Wu C, Tai C. Effect of lag-screw positions on modes of fixation failure in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Surg. 2010;18(2):158–65.
Brammar TJ, Kendrew J, Khan RJK, Parker MJ. Reverse obliquity and transverse fractures of the trochanteric region of the femur; A review of 101 cases. Injury. 2005;36:851–7.
Zhou JQ, Chang SM. Failure of PFNA: Helical blade perforation and tip-apex distance. Injury. 2012;43:1227–8.
Li S, Chang SM, Jin YM, Zhang YQ, Niu WX, Du SC, Zhang LZ, Ma H. A mathematical simulation of the tip-apex distance and the calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for intertrochanteric fractures reduced with lag screws. Injury. 2016;47:1302–8.
Cheng Y, Wang S, Yamazaki T, Zhao J, Nakajima Y, Tamura S. Hip cartilage thickness measurement accuracy improvement. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007;31:643–55.
Mitra A, Khadijeh B, Vida AP, Ali RN, Farzaneh M, Maryam VF, Vahid Y. Sexing based on measurements of the femoral head parameters on pelvic radiographs. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014;23:70–5.
Zhang W, Antony Xavier RP, Decruz J, Chen YD, Park DH. Risk factors for mechanical failure of intertrochanteric fractures after fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA II): a study in a Southeast Asian population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;7:20–6.
Yam M, Kang BJ, Chawla A, Zhang W, Way LG, Xavier RPA, et al. Cephalomedullary blade cut-ins: a poorly understood phenomenon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;22:110–28.
Turgut A, Kalenderer Ö, Karapınar L, Kumbaracı M, Akkan HA, Ağuş H. Which factor is most important for occurrence of cutout complications in patients treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation? Retrospective analysis of 298 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:623–30.
Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, Saggioro E, Barbati G, Ratti C, et al. Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138:351–9.
Walton MJ, Barnett AJ, Jackson M. Tip-apex distance as a predictor of failure following cephalo-medullary fixation for unstable fractures of the proximal femur. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008;34:273–6.
There is no funding source.
Conflict of interest
Omer Subasi, Lercan Aslan, Aksel Seyahi, Mehmet Demirhan and Ismail Lazoglu declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
This article does not contain patient data.
Availability of data and material
Available upon request.
About this article
Cite this article
Subasi, O., Aslan, L., Demirhan, M. et al. A novel lower bound for tip-apex distance. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01514-x
- Tip-apex distance
- Intertrochanteric fracture
- Proximal nailing