Skip to main content

Specificities of terrorist attacks: organisation of the in-hospital patient-flow and treatment strategies

Abstract

Background

Mass-casualty incidents are always a particular challenge not only for healthcare providers and other emergency service responders at the scene but also for receiving hospitals. Terrorism-related mass-casualty incidents can result in a wide variety of different scenarios so that hospitals and their personnel must prepare for far more complex and demanding requirements.

Purpose

In this article, we describe and discuss in-hospital aspects of mass-casualty terrorist incidents and focus on the special medical and in particular surgical care that is required in this setting.

Methods

The overview presented here is based on the Terror and Disaster Surgical Care (TDSC®) course. The TDSC® course was mainly developed from a comprehensive and structured analysis of the literature, single expert opinions, and expert consensus conferences. The objective of this course is to train clinical decision-makers in how to manage major incidents.

Results

The management of a mass-casualty terrorist incident and the care of victims present multiple and unique challenges to hospitals. This applies in particular to the number and distribution of patients arriving at the hospital, injury patterns, infrastructural aspects, and personnel resources. Particular attention must be given to the surgical approach to caring for these patients, e.g., early total care, damage control surgery, or tactical abbreviated surgical care.

Conclusion

Mass-casualty terrorist incidents are different from other mass-casualty events in many respects that require special attention. The provision of appropriate public services requires in particular that the preparation and training of personnel as well as the organisation of the in-hospital response be tailored to the incident.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 2019. https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?chart=regions&casualties_type=b&casualties_max=&dtp2=all&region=9,8. Accessed 17 Jan 2020.

  2. Khorram-Manesh A. Europe on fire; medical management of terror attacks—new era and new considerations. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2016;4(4):183–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khorram-Manesh A, Berlin J, Carlstrom E. Two validated ways of improving the ability of decision-making in emergencies; results from a literature review. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2016;4(4):186–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Khorram-Manesh A, et al. Education in disaster management: what do we offer and what do we need? proposing a new global program. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(6):854–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruchholtz S, et al. Reduction in mortality of severely injured patients in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105(13):225–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin TE. The Ramstein airshow disaster. J R Army Med Corps. 1990;136(1):19–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oestern HJ, et al. Facts about the disaster at Eschede. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(4):287–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleber C, et al. Trauma-related preventable deaths in Berlin 2010: need to change prehospital management strategies and trauma management education. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1154–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mintz Y, et al. The experience of one institution dealing with terror: the El Aqsa Intifada riots. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002;4(7):554–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheffy N, et al. Terror-related injuries: a comparison of gunshot wounds versus secondary-fragments-induced injuries from explosives. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203(3):297–303.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eastridge BJ, et al. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care. J Trauma. 2011;71(1 Suppl):S4–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eastridge BJ, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437437.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Franke A, et al. Preclinical and intrahospital management of mass casualties and terrorist incidents. Chirurg. 2017;88(10):830–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schreiber S, et al. Hospital preparedness for possible nonconventional casualties: an Israeli experience. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26(5):359–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Einav S, et al. Surgeon and hospital leadership during terrorist-related multiple-casualty events: a coup d'etat. Arch Surg. 2006;141(8):815–22.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Ceballos JP, et al. 11 March 2004: The terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain—an analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital. Crit Care. 2005;9(1):104–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haug CJ. Report from Paris. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(27):2589–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reilly MJ, Markenson D. Hospital referral patterns: how emergency medical care is accessed in a disaster. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010;4(3):226–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hossfeld B, et al. Mass casualty incident—special features of “threatening situations”. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2017;52(9):618–29.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 2018. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hospitals-counter-terrorism-office-warning-target-attack-guidelines-a7784196.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2020.

  21. Gusgen C, Schwab R, Kleber C. Triage and emergency surgical care in the event of a disaster. Zentralbl Chir. 2018;143(2):121–30.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleber C, et al. The Berlin mass casualty hospital triage algorithm: development, implementation and influence on exercise-based triage results. Unfallchirurg. 2019;123:187–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Einav S, et al. In-hospital resource utilization during multiple casualty incidents. Ann Surg. 2006;243(4):533–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Einav S, Schecter WP. Disaster management: who's in charge? Am J Disaster Med. 2006;1(1):10–1.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao PP, Singh DV. Combat surgery: status of tactical abbreviated surgical control. Med J Armed Forces India. 2017;73(4):407–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Friemert B, et al. Treatment strategies for mass casualty incidents and terrorist attacks in trauma and vascular surgery: presentation of a treatment concept. Chirurg. 2017;88(10):856–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Franke A, et al. The first aid and hospital treatment of gunshot and blast injuries. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(14):237–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Achatz G, Friemert B, Franke A, Bieler D (2018) Was gibt es Neues bei der Versorgung von schwerverletzten Terrorpatienten? In: Jähne J, Königsrainer A, Südkamp N, Schröder W (Hrsg) Was gibt es Neues in der Chirurgie? Jahresband 2018, ecomed MEDIZIN, Landsberg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard Achatz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Achatz G, Bieler D and Paffrath Th are active as instructors of the TDSC—Course, Friemert B and Franke A are active as directors and instructors of the TDSC—course. Achatz G., Bieler D, Franke A and Friemert B developed the TDSC®—course concept. Hoth P confirms that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

For this study, there were no test or experiments to humans or animals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friemert, B., Achatz, G., Hoth, P. et al. Specificities of terrorist attacks: organisation of the in-hospital patient-flow and treatment strategies . Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 46, 673–682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01390-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01390-5

Keywords

  • Mass-casualty incident
  • Terrorism
  • Preparedness
  • Treatment priorities
  • Treatment approaches
  • Tactical abbreviated surgical care