Rehabilitation protocols in unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails in elderly: current practices and outcome
- 35 Downloads
Optimal rehabilitation treatment after surgery for fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures is challenging in elderly patients.
The objective of this study is to analyse the existing literature on available rehabilitation protocols with regards to permitting or restricting early weight bearing following fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures treated by the use of cephalomedullary nails in patients at least 65 years of age.
A systematic review was performed based on the checklist of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies published between 1948 and 2018 on elderly patients with unstable trochanteric fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails that offered information on the postoperative rehabilitation protocol have been selected. Subsequently, the results and complications have been analysed according to the protocols.
Fifteen of the 7056 initial articles have been selected for analysis. Authors who did not restrict weight bearing to their patients reported a shorter hospitalization time and a lower orthopaedic complication rate but a greater systemic complication rate, worse functional scores, and a higher reoperation and mortality rates. Those results should be taken with caution because of the heterogeneity of provided clinical information and the fact that none of the included studies considered the different rehabilitation protocols as study variables to analyse its influence on the results.
With evidence available to date, there is no clear agreement on the postoperative rehabilitation protocol following fixation of an unstable trochanteric fracture by cephalomedullary nail in the elderly.
KeywordsTrochanteric Unstable Nail Aftercare Rehabilitation Weight bearing
We thank Mr Vasanthakumar Eswaramoorthy FRCS (Tr & Orth), Arthroplasty Fellow, St. George’s University Hospital NHS trust, London for linguistic support in the preparation of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest for the present investigation.
- 6.Queally JM, Harris E, Handoll HH, Parker MJ. Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12(9):CD004961.Google Scholar
- 9.Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Wallden B. Prognostic indicators and early home rehabilitation in elderly patients with hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;152:173–84.Google Scholar
- 26.The EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;36:199–208.Google Scholar
- 30.Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. https://handbook.cochrane.org
- 34.Makki D, Matar HE, Jacob N, Lipscombe S, Gudena R. Comparison of the reconstruction trochanteric antigrade nail (TAN) with the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the management of reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures. Injury. 2015;46(12):2389–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 44.Kim SJ, Park HS, Lee DW, Lee JW. Does short-term weekly teriparatide improve healing in unstable intertrochanteric fractures? J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26(3):1–7.Google Scholar
- 60.Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Muñoz FM, Tufanisco CB. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: a randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(4):229–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar