Advertisement

Traumatic brain injury among two-wheeled motor vehicle riders in Utsunomiya, Japan: a comparison between mopeds and motorcycles

  • Joji InamasuEmail author
  • Masashi Nakatsukasa
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Two-wheeled motor vehicles are dichotomized into mopeds and motorcycles (MCs) based on their engine capacity. While efforts have been made, mostly by European researchers, to evaluate the possible difference in the frequency/severity of riders’ traumatic brain injury (TBI) between the two categories, the results have been inconsistent.

Methods

To evaluate whether such differences exist in Japan, a single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted on two-wheeled motor vehicle riders wearing a helmet during high-energy road traffic accident (RTA). Between January 2011 and December 2017, 127 moped and 128 MC helmeted riders involved in RTAs had been treated in our institution.

Results

Moped riders were significantly older than MC riders (50.7 ± 25.0 years vs. 35.1 ± 18.6 years, p = 0.04). The frequency of TBI was significantly higher in moped riders than in MC riders (21.3% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.03). However, the frequency of other bodily injuries did not differ significantly. Among the riders with TBI, neither injury severity nor outcomes differed significantly. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the presence of altered mental status was predictive of TBI (OR 23.398; 95% CI 9.187–59.586; p < 0.001). Moped riders trended to have a higher likelihood of sustaining TBI (OR 2.122; 95% CI 0.870–5.178; p = 0.098).

Conclusions

Mopeds are frequently utilized by elderly in Japan, which may have been causally associated with the higher frequency of TBI in moped riders, while other causes, including the difference in helmet type, may also be involved. This study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design, and multi-center prospective studies are warranted.

Keywords

Moped Motorcycle Road traffic accident Traumatic brain injury 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest, or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. Joji Inamasu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Masashi Nakatsukasa declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study design was approved by Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital Institutional Review Board (17-0013). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Our IRB determined that written consent from each subject was not necessary.

References

  1. 1.
    Road Traffic Act of Japan (English translation). https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2962&vm=04&re=02. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.
  2. 2.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moped. Accessed 19 Sept 2019.
  3. 3.
    Leijdesdorff HA, Siegerink B, Sier CF, Reurings MC, Schipper IB. Injury pattern, injury severity, and mortality in 33,495 hospital-admitted victims of motorized two-wheeled vehicle crashes in The Netherlands. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:1363–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barsi T, Faegermann C, Larsen LB. Road traffic accidents with two-wheeled motor vehicle during a five-year period in Odense, Denmark. Traffic Inj Prev. 2002;3:283–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Airaksinen N, Nurmi-Lüthje I, Lüthje P. Comparison of injury severity between moped and motorcycle crashes: a Finnish two-year prospective hospital-based study. Scand J Surg. 2016;105:49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Price SJ, Suttner N, Aspoas AR. Have ATLS and national transfer guidelines improved the quality of resuscitation and transfer of head-injured patients? A prospective survey from a Regional Neurosurgical Unit. Injury. 2003;34:834–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inamasu J, Nakatsukasa M, Hirose Y. Computed tomography evaluation of the brain and upper cervical spine in patients with traumatic cardiac arrest who achieved return of spontaneous circulation. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53:585–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inamasu J, Nakaya M, Kujirai D, Mayanagi K, Nakatsukasa M. Frequency and characteristics of traumatic brain injury in restrained drivers involved in road traffic accidents. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160:1921–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Inamasu J, Nakatsukasa M, Tomiyasu K, Mayanagi K, Nishimoto M, Oshima T, Yoshii M, Miyatake S, Imai A. Stroke while driving: frequency and association with automobile accidents. Int J Stroke. 2018;13:301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inamasu J, Kujirai D, Izawa Y, Kase K, Shinozaki H. Difference in severity and distribution of bodily injuries following collision between drivers of K-cars and standard vehicles. Injury. 2019;50:205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Braakman R. Early prediction of outcome in severe head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;116:161–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll CP, Cochran JA, Price JP, Guse CE, Wang MC. The AIS-2005 revision in severe traumatic brain injury: mission accomplished or problems for future research? Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:233–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keall MD, Newstead S. Analysis of factors that increase motorcycle rider risk compared to car driver risk. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;49:23–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fitzharris M, Dandona R, Kumar GA, Dandona L. Crash characteristics and patterns of injury among hospitalized motorised two-wheeled vehicle users in urban India. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yannis G, Antoniou C, Evgenikos P, Papantoniou P, Kirk A. Characteristics and causes of power two wheeler accidents in Europe. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;48:1535–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leijdesdorff HA, van Dijck JT, Krijnen P, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Schipper IB, Regional Trauma Center West-Netherlands’ Research Group. Injury pattern, hospital triage, and mortality of 1250 patients with severe traumatic brain injury caused by road traffic accidents. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsieh CH, Liu HT, Hsu SY, Hsieh HY, Chen YC. Motorcycle-related hospitalizations of the elderly. Biomed J. 2017;40:121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu WY, Chen CY, Chiu WT, Lin MR. Effectiveness of different types of motorcycle helmets and effects of their improper use on head injuries. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:794–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Padmanaban J. Influences of vehicle size and mass and selected driver factors on odds of driver fatality. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:507–24.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huggins R. Using speeding detections and numbers of fatalities to estimate relative risk of a fatality for motorcyclists and car drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2013;59:296–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgerySaiseikai Utsunomiya HospitalUtsunomiyaJapan

Personalised recommendations