Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality of life after multiple trauma: results from a patient cohort treated in a certified trauma network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Besides mortality, the patient-reported outcome (PRO) in survivors of multiple trauma is of increasing interest. So far, no data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multiple trauma from an entire trauma network are available. Within this study, the course of the PRO over time and differences between level I and level II trauma centers within an entire trauma network was evaluated.

Methods

Multiple injured patients, treated in a rural trauma network over 2 years, were prospectively included in this study. After 6, 12 and 24 months the results of the European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) EQ-5D outcome instrument were evaluated. To adjust for differences in trauma severity between level I and level II centers, the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) and the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) were used to adjust the life-quality results of patients.

Results

501 patients were included, 118 patients with an ISS < 16 points, 383 patients reached 16 points or more. Despite a steady increase of EQ-5D index over time (6 months: 0.71 ± 0.31; 12 months: 0.74 ± 0.28; 24 months: 0.76 ± 0.27; p < 0.001), the values of a reference population could not be reached even 2 years after trauma (EQ-5D reference population: 0.9). After adjustment for trauma severity, no significant differences in PROMs between level I and level II centers could be detected (p = 0.188).

Conclusion

The consistently low EQ-5D index relative the reference population and the lack of a difference between level I and II centers suggest that improved strategies for polytrauma aftercare are called for.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. 2008. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/2004_report_update/en/. Accessed 20 Jan 2019.

  2. Ruchholtz S, Lefering R, Paffrath T, Oestern H-J, Neugebauer E, Nast-Kolb D, et al. Reduction in mortality of severely injured patients in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105:225–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ernstberger A, Koller M, Zeman F, Kerschbaum M, Hilber F, Diepold E, et al. A trauma network with centralized and local health care structures: evaluating the effectiveness of the first certified Trauma Network of the German Society of Trauma Surgery. PloS one. 2018;13:e0194292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaske S, Lefering R, Trentzsch H, Driessen A, Bouillon B, Maegele M, et al. Quality of life two years after severe trauma: a single-centre evaluation. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl 3):S100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed W, Alwe R, Wade D. One-year functional outcomes following major trauma: experience of a UK level 1 major trauma centre. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:1646–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsen P, Goethgen CB, Rasmussen S, Iyer AB, Elsoe R. One-year development of QOL following orthopaedic polytrauma: a prospective observational cohort study of 53 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:1539–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marasco S, Lee G, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2015;46:61–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmel S, Drisch S, Haag S, Bühren V. Long-term results after multiple trauma with ISS ≥ 25. Chirurg. 2013;84:771–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. von Rüden C, Woltmann A, Röse M, Wurm S, Rüger M, Hierholzer C, et al. Outcome after severe multiple trauma: a retrospective analysis. J Trauma Manag Outcome. 2013;7:973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holtslag HR, van Beeck EF, Lindeman E, Leenen LPH. Determinants of long-term functional consequences after major trauma. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62:919–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Roise O, Finset A. Long-term multidimensional functional consequences of severe multiple injuries two years after trauma: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2007;62:461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dimopoulou I, Anthi A, Mastora Z, Theodorakopoulou M, Konstandinidis A, Evangelou E, et al. Health-related quality of life and disability in survivors of multiple trauma one year after intensive care unit discharge. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83:171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. States JD. The abbreviated and the comprehensive research injury scales. SAE Tech Paper. 1969. https://doi.org/10.4271/690810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker SP, OʼNeill B, Haddon WJR, Long WB. The injury severity score. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1974;14:187–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGU™: The Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II. Crit Care. 2014;18:476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer CS, Cameron PA, Gabbe BJ. A review of the revised Functional Capacity Index as a predictor of 12 month outcomes following injury. Injury. 2017;48:591–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hinz A, Kohlmann T, Stöbel-Richter Y, Zenger M, Brähler E. The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Qual Life Res. 2013;23:443–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koller M, Ernstberger A, Zeman F, Loss J, Nerlich M, Trauma Network Eastern Bavaria (TNO). Outcome after polytrauma in a certified trauma network: comparing standard vs. maximum care facilities concept of the study and study protocol (POLYQUALY). BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-reported population health: an international perspective based on EQ-5D. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is funded by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (reference number 01GY1153) in the context of the funding initiative Health Services Research. On behalf of the Trauma Network Eastern Bavaria (TNO): Klinikum Amberg, Dr. Bauer; Krankenhaus Bogen, Dr. Lehner; Krankenhaus Burglengenfeld, Dr. Cedl; Krankenhaus Cham, Dr. Walter; Klinikum Deggendorf, Prof. Schandelmaier; Krankenhaus Dingolfing, Dr. Maurer; Krankenhaus Eggenfelden, Prof. Wick; Krankenhaus Freyung, Dr. Barz; Krankenhaus Kelheim, Dr. Obermeier; Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf, PD Ganslmeier; Krankenhaus Marktredwitz, Dr. Bay, OA Hoffmann; Krankenhaus Mallersdorf, Dr. Mehlhorn; Klinikum Neumarkt, Dr. Schmickal; Klinikum Passau, Dr. Obernhuber; Klinik der Barmherzigen Brüder Regensburg, Prof. Füchtmeier; Krankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg, Prof. Nerlich; Krankenhaus Schwandorf, Dr. Schneider; Klinikum Straubing, Prof. Oedekoven; Krankenhaus Viechtach, Dr. Schäfer; Krankenhaus Vilsbiburg, Dr. Albersdörfer; Krankenhaus Vilshofen, Dr. Rieger; Krankenhaus Waldkrichen, Dr. Schmid; Klinikum Weiden, Dr. Neubaruer- Grartzke; Krankenhaus Zwiesel, Dr. Walter.

Funding

This study is part of the Polytrauma Health Care Quality Outcome (POLYQUALY) Study (“Outcome after major trauma in a certified trauma network: comparing standard vs. maximum care facilities”) and was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research in the context of a funding program on health services research (01GY1153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Kerschbaum.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Regensburg (number 10-101-0077). The study is registered in the data base of the German Network for Healthcare Research (VfD_Polyqualy_12_001978) and in the German Register for Clinical Studies (number DRKS00010039).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angerpointner, K., Ernstberger, A., Bosch, K. et al. Quality of life after multiple trauma: results from a patient cohort treated in a certified trauma network. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47, 121–127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01160-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01160-y

Keywords

Navigation