Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of sensitivity of whole body CT for major trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Whole body computed tomography has become standard practice in many centres in the management of severely injured trauma patients, however, the evidence for it’s diagnostic accuracy is limited.

Aim

To assess the sensitivity of whole body CT in major trauma.

Method

Retrospective review of all patients with injury severity score (ISS) > 15 presenting with blunt trauma to a UK Major Trauma Centre between May 2012 and April 2014. Injuries were classified as per ISS score—1 = head and neck 2 = face 3 = chest 4 = abdomen. The authors reviewed patient’s electronic charts, radiological results; interventional procedure records, discharge letters and outpatient follow up documentation and referenced this with Trauma Audit and Research Network data.

Results

407 patients with ISS > 15 presented to the Trauma centre during May 2012 and April 2014. Of these, 337 (82.8%) had a whole body CT scan. 246 pts were male, 91 were female. 74 (21.9%) were due to a fall from > 2 m, 41 (12.2%) due to a fall from < 2 m, 208 (61.7%) were due to motor vehicle crashes, 1 (0.3%) due to a blast injury, 5 (1.5%) due to blows, and 8 (2.4%) due to crush injuries. Sensitivity for Region 1 was 0.98, Region 2 = 0.98, Region 3 = 0.98 and Region 4 was 0.95. Overall sensitivity was 0.98. 15 injuries (2.4%) were not identified on initial CT (false −ve). These injuries were: colonic perforation = 1, splenic contusion = 1, pneumothorax = 1, liver laceration = 1, intracranial haemorrhage = 1, cerebral contusions = 1, spinal injuries = 7, canal haemorrhage = 1, maxilla fracture = 1.

Conclusion

These results show that whole body CT in trauma has a high sensitivity and a low rate of missed injuries (2.4%). However, our study only evaluated a subgroup of patients with ISS > 15 and further work is required to assess the use of this investigation for all major trauma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henning J, Woods K. Management of major trauma. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2014;15:405–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Audit Office. Major trauma care in England. London: The Stationery Office; 2010. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hui CM, et al. Radiation dose from initial trauma assessment and resuscitation: review of the literature. Can J Surg. 2009;52(2):147–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fabian TC. Whole body CT in multiple trauma. The Lancet. 2009;373(9673):1408–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber-Wagner S, et al. Effect of whole body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet. 2009;373(9673):1455–1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeguiayan, et al. Impact of whole body CT on mortality and surgical management of severe blunt trauma. Crit Care. 2012;16:R101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rizzo AG, Steinberg SM, Flint LM. Prospective assessment of the value of computed tomography for trauma. J Trauma. 1995;38:338–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salim A, Sangthung B, Martin M, Brown C, Plurad D, Demetriades D. Whole body imaging in blunt multisystem trauma patients without obvious signs of injury. Arch Surg. 2006;141:468–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith I, Naumann DN, et al. Scanning and war: utility of FAST and CT in the assessment of battlefield abdominal trauma. Ann Surg. 2015;262(2):389–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stengel D, Ottersbach C, Matthes G, Weigeldt M, Grundei S, et al. Accuracy of single-pass whole body computed tomography for detection of injuries in patients with major blunt trauma. CMAJ. 2012;184(8):869–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fakler JKM, Orkun A, Justen C. Retrospective analysis of incidental non-trauma associated findings in severely injured patients identified by whole-body spiral CT scans. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;8:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queen’s Medical Centre, Derby Rd, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Susan Yoong, Ravi Kothari & Adam Brooks

Authors
  1. Susan Yoong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravi Kothari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Yoong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Susan Yoong, Ravi Kothari and Adam Brooks declare they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Human and animal right statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 55 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoong, S., Kothari, R. & Brooks, A. Assessment of sensitivity of whole body CT for major trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45, 489–492 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0926-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0926-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation