Validation of the Baragwanath mortality prediction score for cerebral gunshot wounds: the Pietermaritzburg experience

  • V. Y. Kong
  • G. V. Oosthuizen
  • B. Sartorious
  • J. L. Bruce
  • G. L. Laing
  • R. Weale
  • D. L. Clarke
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Cerebral gunshot wounds (GSW) are highly lethal injuries. To date, only one clinical scoring system to predict mortality in a developing world setting has been described. This is the Baragwanath mortality prediction score (“ABC”: admission blood pressure, brain matter spillage and consciousness level).

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively entered data for a cohort of patients with isolated cerebral GSWs over a 5-year period (January 2010–December 2014) in our institution. We aimed to validate the Baragwanath ABC mortality prediction score in our population.

Results

During the 5-year study period, 102 patients with isolated cerebral GSWs were reviewed, 22% (22/102) of which died. Based on the total ABC score (1–5), the mortality was 0% for 1, 21% for 2, 67% for 3, 92% for 4, and 100% for 5. The ABC score has a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 60–95%), specificity of 96% (95% CI 89–99%), PPV of 86% (95% CI 66–96%) and NPV of 95% (95% CI 86–99%).

Conclusions

The Baragwanath mortality prediction score accurately predicts non survival of patients with a cerebral GSW in our patient cohort. Further validation studies in other populations are required before this system can be widely adopted.

Keywords

Gunshot wounds Prediction score Mortality 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Stoffel M, Hüser N, Kayser K, Kriner M, Degiannis E, Doll D. Cerebral gunshot wounds: a score based on three clinical parameters to predict the risk of early mortality. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79(11):789–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joseph B, Aziz H, Pandit V, Kulvatunyou N, O’Keeffe T, Wynne J, et al. Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds to the brain. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):58–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone JL, Lichtor T, Fitzgerald LF. Gunshot wounds to the head in civilian practice. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(6):1104–10 (discussion 1110–2).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris OA, Bruce CA, Reid M, Cheeks R, Easley K, Surles MC, et al. Examination of the management of traumatic brain injury in the developing and developed world: focus on resource utilization, protocols, and practices that alter outcome. J Neurosurg 2008;109(3):433–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clarke DL, Thomson SR, Madiba TE, Muckart DJ. Selective conservatism in trauma management: a South African contribution. World J Surg. 2005;29(8):962–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muckart DJJ. Trauma: the malignant epidemic. S Afr J Med 1991;79:93–5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aarabi B, Tofighi B, Kufera JA, Hadley J, Ahn ES, Cooper C, et al. Predictors of outcome in civilian gunshot wounds to the head. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(5):1138–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Santos MT, Zanon-Collange N, Moraes OJ. Prognostic factors and treatment of penetrating gunshot wounds to the head. Surg Neurol. 2003;60(2):98–104 (discussion 104).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ambrosi PB, Valença MM, Azevedo-Filho H. Prognostic factors in civilian gunshot wounds to the head: a series of 110 surgical patients and brief literature review. Neurosurg Rev. 2012;35(3):429–35 (discussion 435–6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veller M. Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand—a brief history. S Afr J Surg. 2006;44(2):44–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robbs JV. History of the Department of Surgery, Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal. S Afr J Surg. 2005;43(4):154–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vermont J, Bosson JL, Francois P, Robert C, Rueff A, Demongeot J. Strategies for graphical threshold determination. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 1991;35:141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hammon WM. Analysis of 2187 consecutive penetrating wounds of the brain from Vietnam. J Neurosurg. 1971;34(2 Pt 1):127–31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin DJ, Lam FC, Siracuse JJ, Thomas A, Kasper EM. “Time is brain” the Gifford factor—or: why do some civilian gunshot wounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case series with outcomes analysis and a management guide. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aldrich EF, Eisenberg HM, Saydjari C, Foulkes MA, Jane JA, Marshall LF, et al. Predictors of mortality in severely head-injured patients with civilian gunshot wounds: a report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Surg Neurol. 1992;38(6):418 – 23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glapa M, Zorio M, Snyckers FD, Bowley DM, Yilmaz TH, Doll D, et al. Gunshot wounds to the head in civilian practice. Am Surg. 2009;75(3):223–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hardcastle TC, Finlayson M, van Heerden M, Johnson B, Samuel C, Muckart DJ. The prehospital burden of disease due to trauma in KwaZulu-Natal: the need for Afrocentric trauma systems. World J Surg. 2013;37(7):1513–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Y. Kong
    • 1
  • G. V. Oosthuizen
    • 1
  • B. Sartorious
    • 1
  • J. L. Bruce
    • 1
  • G. L. Laing
    • 1
  • R. Weale
    • 2
  • D. L. Clarke
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Department of Surgery, Nelson Mandela School of MedicineUniversity of KwaZulu NatalDurbanSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryWessex DeaneryWinchesterUK
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations