Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Isolated transverse process fractures: insignificant injury or marker of complex injury pattern?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study investigates the incidence of isolated transverse process fractures (ITPFx) amongst vertebral fractures in trauma patients, and specific-associated injury patterns present in patients with ITPFx.

Materials and methods

A retrospective, 4-year review of our Level 1 Trauma Center registry was performed. Patients with blunt spinal column fractures were identified. Data collected included patient demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), type of imaging obtained, and concomitant injuries, including rib and pelvic fractures, liver, spleen, and kidney injury (SOI).

Results

Of the 10,186 patients admitted during the study period, 881 (8.6%) suffered blunt thoraco-abdominal trauma resulting in vertebral fractures; 214/881 (24%) had ITPFx. All patients (10,186) underwent dedicated spinal multi-detector CT (MDCT) imaging; 26/214 (12.1%) patients had MRI. In all 26 patients, the MRI confirmed the CT findings. 202/214 (94.4%) had associated injuries: rib and pelvic fractures, 45.5 and 20.2%, respectively, and splenic, liver and kidney injury with an incidence of 13.8, 10.9, and 9.4%, respectively. A higher incidence of rib fractures was associated with ITPFx at the T1–4 levels, whereas ITPFx at the level of L5 were associated with pelvic fractures and SOI. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified T1–4 and L5 fractures as predictors of rib fractures and pelvic fractures independent of ISS, with OR: 2.55 (95% CI: 1.12–5.82) and 6.81 (95% CI: 3.14–14.78), respectively.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this study, we conclude that: (1) the use of MDCT imaging has increased the rate of identification of ITPFx; (2) dedicated spinal MDCT reconstruction and MRI may not be necessary to diagnose isolated thoracic and lumbar ITPFx; and (3) ITPFx of the thoracic spine and lower lumbar spine are markers of associated rib fractures and pelvic ring fractures, respectively, as well as of solid organ injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Austria)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Homnick A, Lavery R, Nicastro O, et al. Isolated thoracolumbar transverse process fractures: call physical therapy, not spine. J Trauma. 2007;63:1292–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patten RM, Gunberg SR, Brandenburger DK. Frequency and importance of transverse process fractures in the lumbar vertebrae at helical abdominal CT in patients with trauma. Radiology. 2000;215:831–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller CD, Blyth P, Civil IDS. Lumbar transverse process fractures—a sentinel marker of abdominal organ injuries. Injury. 2000;31:773–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krueger MA, Green DA, Hoyt D, et al. Overlooked spine injuries associated with lumbar transverse process fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;327:191–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley LH, Paulus WC, Howe J, et al. Isolated transverse process fractures: spine service management not needed. J Trauma. 2008;65:832–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wintermark M, Elyazid M, Theumann N, et al. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2003;227:681–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hauser CJ, Visvikis G, Hinrichs C, et al. Prospective validation of computed tomographic screening of the thoracolumbar spine in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;55:228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berry GE, Adams S, Harris MB, et al. Are plain radiographs of the spine necessary during evaluation after blunt trauma? Accuracy of screening torso computed tomography in thoracic/lumbar spine fracture diagnosis. J Trauma. 2005;59:1410–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brandt MM, Wahl WL, Yeom K. Computed tomographic scanning reduces cost and time of complete spine evaluation. J Trauma. 2004;56:1022–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheridan R, Peralta R, Rhea J. Reformatted visceral protocol helical computed tomographic scanning allows conventional radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine to be eliminated in the evaluation of blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. 2003;55:665–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983;8:817–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Lombardo.

Ethics declarations

This research study has followed an effective Compliance with Ethics Guidelines. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

Gary Lombardo, Patrizio Petrone, Kartik Prabhakaran, and Corrado P. Marini declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lombardo, G., Petrone, P., Prabhakaran, K. et al. Isolated transverse process fractures: insignificant injury or marker of complex injury pattern?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43, 657–661 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0745-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0745-7

Keywords

Navigation