Assessment of hospital surge capacity using the MACSIM simulation system: a pilot study
The aim of this study was to use a simulation model developed for the scientific evaluation of methodology in disaster medicine to test surge capacity (SC) in a major hospital responding to a simulated major incident with a scenario copied from a real incident.
The tested hospital was illustrated on a system of magnetic boards, where available resources, staff, and patients treated in the hospital at the time of the test were illustrated. Casualties were illustrated with simulation cards supplying all data required to determine procedures for diagnosis and treatment, which all were connected to real consumption of time and resources.
The first capacity-limiting factor was the number of resuscitation teams that could work parallel in the emergency department (ED). This made it necessary to refer severely injured to other hospitals. At this time, surgery (OR) and intensive care (ICU) had considerable remaining capacity. Thus, the reception of casualties could be restarted when the ED had been cleared. The next limiting factor was lack of ventilators in the ICU, which permanently set the limit for SC. At this time, there was still residual OR capacity. With access to more ventilators, the full surgical capacity of the hospital could have been utilized.
The tested model was evaluated as an accurate tool to determine SC. The results illustrate that SC cannot be determined by testing one single function in the hospital, since all functions interact with each other and different functions can be identified as limiting factors at different times during the response.
KeywordsSurge capacity Major incident Simulation system Hospital preparedness MACSIM system
The authors want to express their gratitude to the Management of the Karolinska University Hospital for providing resources for the preparation and performance of this test. We also want to thank all participating staff of the hospital for invaluable support in the preparatory work, professional performance during the test and valuable feedback on the methodology. This study was supported by the Stockholm County Council, Sweden and the Laerdal foundation, Norway (Grant 2908).
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors state compliance with the ethical guidelines in the creating of this manuscript. The preceding inventory of the hospital was done with complete removal of all data connected to individual patients. All staff participated voluntarily.
Conflict of interest
Kristina Lennquist Montán, Louis Riddez, Anna Carin Olsberg, Håkan Lindberg, Dan Gryth and Per Örtenwall declare that they have no conflict of interest. One of the authors, Sten Lennquist, has the copyright for the MACSIM simulation system, developed for scientific and educational purpose. The evaluation of the hospitals capacity and function was done by external observers, also participating as supervisors during the test.
- 2.United nations General Assembly, Implementation of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, Report of the Secretary-General. A/64/280. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/resolutions-reports. Accessed 16 Jan 2016
- 3.Altevogt BM, Stroud C, Nadig L et al. Medical surge capacity workshop summary. Washington DC: Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, The National Academic Press; 2010. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12798&page=1. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
- 5.The National Academies Press. medical surge capacity workshop summary. Washington DC: The National Academic Press; 2010. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12798&page=99. Accessed 16 Jan 16 2016.
- 7.Adams LM. Exploring the concept of surge capacity. Online J Issues Nurs. 2009; 14(2). doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol14No02PPT03.
- 11.American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: advanced trauma life support program for doctors. 8th ed. Chicago; 2008.Google Scholar
- 12.Englund L, Michel PO, Riddez L et al. The bomb attack in Oslo and the shootings at Utøya, 2011. Kamedo report 97. Socialstyrelsen; 2012. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/18925/2012-12-23.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
- 26.Boffard K, editor. Manual of definitive surgical trauma care. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Arnold; 2011.Google Scholar
- 30.McLean CR, Lee YT, Jain S. Integration of incident management simulation-based training applications. Proceedings of the 2007 fall simulation interoperability workshop (SIW), Orlando; 2007. http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=822749. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.