Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal changes in hematologic markers after splenectomy, splenic embolization, and observation for trauma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The spleen is one of the most commonly injured abdominal solid organs during blunt trauma. Modern management of splenic trauma has evolved to include non-operative therapies, including observation and angioembolization to preclude splenectomy in most cases of blunt splenic injury. Despite the shift in management strategies, relatively little is known about the hematologic changes associated with these various modalities. The aim of this study was to determine if there are significant differences in hematologic characteristics over time based on the treatment modality employed following splenic trauma. We hypothesized that alterations seen in hematologic parameters would vary between observation (OBS), embolization (EMB), and splenectomy (SPL) in the setting of splenic injury.

Methods

An institutional review board-approved, retrospective study of routine hematologic indices examined data between March 2000 and December 2014 at three academic trauma centers. A convenience sample of patients with splenic trauma and admission lengths of stay >96 h was selected for inclusion, resulting in a representative sample of each sub-group (OBS, EMB, and SPL). Basic demographics and injury severity data (ISS) were abstracted. Platelet count, red blood cell (RBC) count and RBC indices, and white blood cell (WBC) count with differential were analyzed between the time of admission and a maximum of 1080 h (45 days) post-injury. Comparisons between OBS, EMB, and SPL groups were then performed using non-parametric statistical testing, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

Data from 130 patients (40 SPL, 40 EMB, and 50 OBS) were analyzed. The median age was 40 years, with 67 % males. Median ISS was 21.5 (21 for SPL, 19 for EMB, and 22 for OBS, p = n/s) and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 15. Median splenic injury grade varied by interventional modality (grade 4 for SPL, 3 for EMB, and 2 for OBS, p < 0.05). Inter-group comparisons demonstrated no significant differences in RBC counts. However, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and RBC distribution width (RDW) were elevated in the SPL and EMB groups (p < 0.01). Similarly, EMB and SPL groups had higher platelet counts than the OBS group (p < 0.01). In aggregate, WBC counts were highest following SPL, followed by EMB and OBS (p < 0.01). Similar trends were noted in neutrophil and monocyte counts (p < 0.01), but not in lymphocyte counts (p = n/s).

Conclusion

This study describes important trends and patterns among fundamental hematologic parameters following traumatic splenic injuries managed with SPL, EMB, or OBS. As expected, observed WBC counts were highest following SPL, then EMB, and finally OBS. No differences were noted in RBC count between the three groups, but RDW was significantly greater following SPL compared to EMB and OBS. We also found that MCV was highest following OBS, when compared to EMB or SPL. Finally, our data indicate that platelet counts are similarly elevated for both SPL and EMB, when compared to the OBS group. These results provide an important foundation for further research in this still relatively unexplored area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stassen NA, et al. Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(5 Suppl 4):S294–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goljan RR. Hematology USMLE. 2015. https://quizlet.com/34394630/goljan-rr-hematology-usmle-flash-cards/. Accessed 4 Nov 2015.

  3. William BM, et al. Hyposplenism: a comprehensive review. Part II: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Hematology. 2007;12(2):89–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tominaga GT, et al. Immunologic function after splenic embolization, is there a difference? J Trauma. 2009;67(2):289–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayglothling JA, Haan JM, Scalea TM. Blunt splenic injuries in the adolescent trauma population: the role of angiography and embolization. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(1):21–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller PR, et al. Prospective trial of angiography and embolization for all grade III to V blunt splenic injuries: nonoperative management success rate is significantly improved. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(4):644–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris DH, Bullock FD. The importance of the spleen in resistance to infection. Ann Surg. 1919;70(5):513–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumpe DA, et al. Partial splenic embolization in children with hypersplenism. Radiology. 1985;155(2):357–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Madoff DC, et al. Splenic arterial interventions: anatomy, indications, technical considerations, and potential complications. Radiographics. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S191–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan PN, et al. Postsplenectomy reactive thrombocytosis. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2009;22(1):9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CM, et al. Evaluation of the effect of partial splenic embolization on platelet values for liver cirrhosis patients with thrombocytopenia. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(4):619–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyazaki M, et al. Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(1):123–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein DM, Scalea TM. Nonoperative management of spleen and liver injuries. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;21(5):296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Skattum J, et al. Preserved splenic function after angioembolisation of high grade injury. Injury. 2012;43(1):62–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Andersson R, et al. Nonoperative treatment of blunt trauma to liver and spleen. Acta Chir Scand. 1986;152:739–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen IC, et al. Spleen artery embolization increases the success of nonoperative management following blunt splenic injury. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011;74(8):341–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dent D, et al. Blunt splenic injuries: high nonoperative management rate can be achieved with selective embolization. J Trauma. 2004;56(5):1063–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Falimirski M, Syed A, Prybilla D. Immunocompetence of the severely injured spleen verified by differential interference contrast microscopy: the red blood cell pit test. J Trauma. 2007;63(5):1087–91 (discussion 1091–2).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith J, et al. Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough? J Trauma. 2008;64(3):656–63 (discussion 663–5).

  20. Kimura F, et al. Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):1021–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanrıöver MD, et al. Splenic artery embolization: an alternative approach in a critically ill patient with autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Turk J Hematol. 2011;28:135–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haan J, et al. Protocol-driven nonoperative management in patients with blunt splenic trauma and minimal associated injury decreases length of stay. J Trauma. 2003;55(2):317–21 (discussion 321–2).

  23. Bessman J, Gilmer P Jr, Gardner FH. Improved classification of anemias by MCV and RDW. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;80(3):322–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tefferi A, Hanson CA, Inwards DJ. How to interpret and pursue an abnormal complete blood cell count in adults. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Elsevier; 2005.

  25. Papa A, et al. Predictive value of elevated neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio on cardiac mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;395(1):27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yetter EM, et al. Estimating splenic volume: sonographic measurements correlated with helical CT determination. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(6):1615–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakae H, et al. Does splenic preservation treatment (embolization, splenorrhaphy, and partial splenectomy) improve immunologic function and long-term prognosis after splenic injury? J Trauma. 2009;67(3):557–63 (discussion 563–4).

  28. Corazza GR, et al. Changes in peripheral blood lymphocytes and immune complexes in splenectomized patients: lack of correlation with residual splenic function. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1990;31(1):33–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Karakantza M, et al. In vitro study of the long-term effects of post-traumatic splenectomy on cellular immunity. Scand J Immunol. 2004;59(2):209–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Theodorou GL, et al. Effect of non-operative management (NOM) of splenic rupture versus splenectomy on the distribution of peripheral blood lymphocyte populations and cytokine production by T cells. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;150(3):429–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chernecky CC, Berger BJ, Laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.

  32. Pratl B, et al. Partial splenic embolization in children with hereditary spherocytosis. Eur J Haematol. 2008;80(1):76–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aslan D, et al. Importance of RDW value in differential diagnosis of hypochrome anemias. Am J Hematol. 2002;69(1):31–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Monzon CM, Beaver BD, Dillon TD. Evaluation of erythrocyte disorders with mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and red cell distribution width (RDW). Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987;26(12):632–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Penny R, Rozenberg MC, Firkin BG. The splenic platelet pool. Blood. 1966;27(1):1–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Laufer N, et al. The influence fo traumatic splenectomy on the volume of human platelets. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978;146(6):889–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kojouri K, et al. Splenectomy for adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review to assess long-term platelet count responses, prediction of response, and surgical complications. Blood. 2004;104(9):2623–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Watters JM, et al. Splenectomy leads to a persistent hypercoagulable state after trauma. Am J Surg. 2010;199(5):646–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. P. Stawicki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

B. Wernick, A. Cipriano, S. R. Odom, U. MacBean, R. N. Mubang, T. R. Wojda, S. Liu, S. Serres, David C. Evans, P. G. Thomas, C. H. Cook, and S. P. Stawicki declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest related to this project.

Ethical conduct of research statement

The current project has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wernick, B., Cipriano, A., Odom, S.R. et al. Temporal changes in hematologic markers after splenectomy, splenic embolization, and observation for trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43, 399–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0679-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0679-0

Keywords

Navigation