Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Triplane fractures: do we need cross-sectional imaging?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Diagnosis of Triplane fractures remains difficult in common practice. Aim of the study was the evaluation of the fracture pattern and the benefit of cross-sectional imaging in classification of Triplane-fractures.

Material and Methods

A total of 27 pediatric patients treated for ankle fractures were identified from patient charts. Radiographic images of epiphyseal fractures (X-rays and additional cross-sectional imaging) were blinded evaluated by 13 observers to answer a specific questionnaire regarding type or fracture and treatment suggestion.

Results

There were seven Triplane-I and eight Triplane-II fractures. The other physeal ankle fracture group consisted of four patients with a Twoplane-fracture, five Salter-and-Harris (SH) II, one SH-III, and two SH-IV fracture. Accuracy of classification improved considerably depending on the experience of the observer in pediatric trauma care. Surgeons specialized in pediatric trauma care classified correctly with conventional X-rays in 48.1 % of all cases presented versus 31.5 % appropriate diagnosis by younger fellows. Accuracy in exact specification of Triplane-fractures was comparable lesser in younger fellows (31.1 vs. 22 %). Cross-sectional imaging improved classification of all fractures in both groups (75.6 % specialized vs. 47.3 % non specialized). Whereas availability of cross-sectional imaging improved treatment recommendation in specialized surgeons this benefit was not detectable for the doctors without specialization. Evaluation of fracture pattern showed a relatively stereotypical fracture pattern in Triplane-II fractures, whereas Triplane-I fractures were more variable.

Conclusion

The additional information of cross-sectional imaging seems helpful for any physician in finding the right classification of a pediatric ankle fracture. However, the additive information appears especially viable for experienced surgeons to suggest the appropriate treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petit P, Panuel M, Faure F, et al. Acute fracture of the distal tibial physis: role of gradient-echo MR imaging versus plain film examination. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1203–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lohman M, Kivisaari A, Kallio P, et al. Acute paediatric ankle trauma: MRI versus plain radiography. Skel Radiol. 2001;30:504–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kay RM, Matthys GA. Paediatric ankle fractures: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001;9:268–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. von Laer L, Kraus R, Linhart WE. Frakturen und Luxationen im Wachstumsalter. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Landin LA, Danielsson LG, Jonsson K, Pettersson H. Late results in 65 physeal ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57:530–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karrholm J, Hansson LI, Svensson K. Incidence of tibio-fibular shaft and ankle fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2:386–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooperman DR, Spiegel PG, Laros GS. Tibial fractures involving the ankle in children. The so-called triplane epiphyseal fracture. J B Jt Surg Am. 1978;60:1040–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mac Nealy GA, Rogers LF, Hernandez R, Poznanski AK. Injuries of the distal tibial epiphysis: systematic radiographic evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:683–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spiegel PG, Cooperman DR, Laros GS. Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. A retrospective study of two hundred and thirty-seven cases in children. J B Jt Surg Am. 1978;60:1046–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rapariz JM, Ocete G, Gonzalez-Herranz P, et al. Distal tibial triplane fractures: long-term follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16:113–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman DS, Otsuka NY, Hedden DM. Extra-articular triplane fracture of the distal tibial epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:479–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho-Fung V, Pollock A. Triplane fracture. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27:70–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connor DK, Mulligan ME. Extra-articular triplane fracture of the distal tibia: a case report. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:332–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clement DA, Worlock PH. Triplane fracture of the distal tibia. A variant in cases with an open growth plate. J B Jt Surg Br. 1987;69:412–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cone RO III, Nguyen V, Flournoy JG, et al. Triplane fracture of the distal tibial epiphysis: radiographic and CT studies. Radiology. 1984;153:763–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dailiana ZH, Malizos KN, Zacharis K, et al. Distal tibial epiphyseal fractures in adolescents. Am J Orthop (Belle. Mead NJ). 1999;28:309–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Karef E, Sadek HI, Nairn DS, et al. Triplane fracture of the distal tibia. Injury. 2000;31:729–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dias LS, Giegerich CR. Fractures of the distal tibial epiphysis in adolescence. J B Jt Surg Am. 1983;65:438–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans MC, Graham HK. Olecranon fractures in children: part 1: a clinical review; part 2: a new classification and management algorithm. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19:559–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarvis JG, Miyanji F. The complex triplane fracture: ipsilateral tibial shaft and distal triplane fracture. J Trauma. 2001;51:714–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JR, Song KH, Song KJ, et al. Treatment outcomes of triplane and Tillaux fractures of the ankle in adolescence. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010;2:34–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peiro A, Aracil J, Martos F, et al. Triplane distal tibial epiphyseal fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;160:196–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shin AY, Moran ME, Wenger DR. Intramalleolar triplane fractures of the distal tibial epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:352–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karrholm J. The triplane fracture: 4 years of follow-up of 21 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997;6:91–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ertl JP, Barrack RL, Alexander AH, et al. Triplane fracture of the distal tibial epiphysis. Long-term follow-up. J B Jt Surg Am. 1988;70:967–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. von Laer L. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of transitional fractures of the distal part of the tibia. J B Jt Surg Am. 1985;67:687–98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. von Laer L. Epiphyseal fractures. Zentralbl Chir. 1986;111:1217–27.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brown SD, Kasser JR, Zurakowski D, Jaramillo D. Analysis of 51 tibial triplane fractures using CT with multi-planar reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marmor L. An unusual fracture of the tibial epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;73:132–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rogers L. The ankle. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2002

  31. van Laarhoven CJ, Severijnen RS, van der Werken C. Triplane fractures of the distal tibia. J Foot Ankl Surg. 1995;34:556–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Crawford AH. Triplane and tillaux fractures: is a 2 mm residual gap acceptable? J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(Suppl 1):S69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nenopoulos SP, Papavasiliou VA, Papavasiliou AV. Outcome of physeal and epiphyseal injuries of the distal tibia with intra-articular involvement. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:518–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jones S, Phillips N, Ali F, et al. Triplane fractures of the distal tibia requiring open reduction and internal fixation. Pre-operative planning using computed tomography. Injury. 2003;34:293–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Spiegel PG, Mast JW, Cooperman DR, Laros GS. Triplane fractures of the distal tibial epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;188:74–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lemburg SP, Lilienthal E, Heyer CM. Growth plate fractures of the distal tibia: is CT imaging necessary? Arch Orthop Trau Surg. 2010;130:1411–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Schneidmueller.

Additional information

D. Schneidmueller and A. L. Sander contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneidmueller, D., Sander, A.L., Wertenbroek, M. et al. Triplane fractures: do we need cross-sectional imaging?. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40, 37–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0338-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0338-7

Keywords

Navigation