European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 635–639 | Cite as

Computerized dynamic posturography analysis of balance in individuals with a shoulder stabilization sling

  • D. F. LuiEmail author
  • A. Memon
  • S. Kwan
  • H. Mullett
Original Article



Sling immobilization of the upper limb may affect balance. Computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) provides a validated, objective assessment of balance control and postural stability under dynamic test conditions. We tested the balance of individuals with a shoulder stabilization sling (SSS) using an EquiTest machine to objectively assess imbalance while wearing a sling.


Forty-two right hand dominant (RHD) adults (16 females, 26 males; average age 22 years; range 20–35 years) were included in the study, comprising six controls and two SSS groups with 18 dominant hands (DH) and 18 non dominant hands (NDH). CDP assessed balance by the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Motor Control Test (MCT), and Adaptation Test (ADT).


The composite equilibrium scores (CES) were as follows: controls 80.8 %, sling DH 71.1 versus sling NDH 69.6 %. Sling use has lower CES compared to controls (p = 0.025). The use of a sling caused 31 % of subjects to have decreased CES. 22.9 % of sling users had imbalances. Among sling users, the DH group had 19.1 % imbalances compared to 26.8 % for the NDH group (p = 0.044). There were six absolute falls in the DH group versus 12 in the NDH group.


Wearing a sling causes balance decompensation in almost one-third of healthy volunteers, and this is greater when worn in the non dominant hand, with double the number of falls. This has significant implications for patients having prolonged use of a sling. Consideration should be given to operative procedures or conservative management of shoulder pathology where sling use is required and promotion of the early discontinuation of sling use can be considered.


Computerized dynamic posturography EquiTest Sensorimotor test Motor Control Test Adaption Test Shoulder stabilization sling Balance 


Conflict of interest

None of the authors, their immediate families, or any research foundations with which they are affiliated received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.


  1. 1.
    Black FO. What can posturography tell us about vestibular function? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;942:446–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Black FO. Vestibulospinal function assessment by moving platform posturography. Am J Otol. 1985;Suppl:39–46.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Black FO. Vestibular function assessment in patients with Meniere’s disease: the vestibulospinal system. Laryngoscope. 1982;92:1419–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black FO. Vestibular causes of vertigo. Geriatrics. 1975;30(4):123–5, 128–9, 132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Black FO, Lilly DJ, Peterka RJ, Fowler LP, Simmons FB. Vestibulo-ocular and vestibulospinal function before and after cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1987;96:106–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black FO, Nashner LM. Vestibulo-spinal control differs in patients with reduced versus distorted vestibular function. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1984;406:110–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Black FO, O’Leary DP, Wall C 3rd, Furman J. The vestibulospinal stability test: normal limits. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977;84(3 Pt 2):ORL549–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Black FO, Pesznecker SC. Vestibular adaptation and rehabilitation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:355–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Black FO, Pesznecker SC. Vestibular ototoxicity. Clinical considerations. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1993;26:713–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Black FO, Peterka RJ, Elardo SM. Vestibular reflex changes following aminoglycoside induced ototoxicity. Laryngoscope. 1987;97:582–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Black FO, Shupert CL, Horak FB, Nashner LM. Abnormal postural control associated with peripheral vestibular disorders. Prog Brain Res. 1988;76:263–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Black FO, Shupert CL, Peterka RJ, Nashner LM. Effects of unilateral loss of vestibular function on the vestibulo-ocular reflex and postural control. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989;98:884–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Black FO, Wall C 3rd, Nashner LM. Effects of visual and support surface orientation references upon postural control in vestibular deficient subjects. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983;95:199–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaudhry H, Findley T, Quigley KS, Bukiet B, Ji Z, Sims T, et al. Measures of postural stability. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:713–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horak FB, Shumway-Cook A, Crowe TK, Black FO. Vestibular function and motor proficiency of children with impaired hearing, or with learning disability and motor impairments. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1988;30:64–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Judge JO, King MB, Whipple R, Clive J, Wolfson LI. Dynamic balance in older persons: effects of reduced visual and proprioceptive input. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50:M263–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S. Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:199–205. doi: 10.1152/jn.00905.2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nashner LM. Vestibular postural control model. Kybernetik. 1972;10:106–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nashner LM. Sensory feedback in human posture control. Sc.D thesis. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1970.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nashner LM, Shupert CL, Horak FB, Black FO. Organization of posture controls: an analysis of sensory and mechanical constraints. Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:411–8; discussion 395–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Paloski WH, Black FO, Reschke MF, Calkins DS, Shupert C. Vestibular ataxia following shuttle flights: effects of microgravity on otolith-mediated sensorimotor control of posture. Am J Otol. 1993;14:9–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paloski WH, Reschke MF, Black FO, Doxey DD, Harm DL. Recovery of postural equilibrium control following spaceflight. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992;656:747–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Serrador JM, Schlegel TT, Black FO, Wood SJ. Vestibular effects on cerebral blood flow. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wall C 3rd, Kentala E. Control of sway using vibrotactile feedback of body tilt in patients with moderate and severe postural control deficits. J Vestib Res. 2005;15:313–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Whipple R, Wolfson L, Derby C, Singh D, Tobin J. Altered sensory function and balance in older persons. J Gerontol 1993; 48(Spec No):71–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wolfson L, Whipple R, Derby CA, Amerman P, Murphy T, Tobin JN, et al. A dynamic posturography study of balance in healthy elderly. Neurology. 1992;42:2069–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolfson L, Whipple R, Derby CA, Amerman P, Nashner L. Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography. J Gerontol. 1994;49:M160–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolfson L, Whipple R, Judge J, Amerman P, Derby C, King M. Training balance and strength in the elderly to improve function. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:341–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Trauma and OrthopaedicsBeaumont HospitalDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations