Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recovery after stabilising surgery for ‘flail chest’

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Purpose

There is a lack of knowledge on respiratory and physical function, mobility and pain following stabilising surgery for ‘flail chest’. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to evaluate pain, respiratory function, range of motion and physical function/activity 3 and 6 months after stabilising surgery in patients with ‘flail chest’ due to trauma.

Method

Twenty-four patients diagnosed with ‘flail chest’ were, 3 and 6 months after the trauma, measured with regard to remaining pain, lung volume, breathing movements, and range of motion in the rib cage and thoracic spine. Physical function and level of physical activity were also estimated.

Results

Approximately 50 % of the patients had remaining pain after 3 months and 35 % had remaining pain after 6 months. Vital capacity was significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months compared to predicted values: >83 % after 3 months and >86 % after 6 months. There were no significant differences between the injured versus non-injured side in breathing movements, nor between the values of the range of motion between the two test occasions. The results of physical function showed mild to moderate disability 3 months after surgery and some or mild disability at 6 months. The patients were active, performing moderate exercise 1–2 h/week or light physical activities more than 4 h/week at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusions

Patients who had undergone stabilising surgery due to ‘flail chest’ showed decreased range of motion 3 and 6 months after surgery. Despite decreased range of motion and remaining pain, the breathing movements are synchronic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gennarelli TA, Wodzin E, editors. The Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005—Update 2008. Barrington: Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM); 2008

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hemmila MR, Wahl WL. Management of the injured patient. In: Doherty GM. editor. Current surgical diagnosis and treatment. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2005. p. 214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keel M, Meier C. Chest injuries—what is new? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007;13:674–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bemelman M, Poeze M, Blokhuis TJ, Leenen LPH. Historic overview of treatment techniques for rib fractures and flail chest. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:407–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strauss EJ, Schwarzkopf R, Kummer F, Egol KA. The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22:479–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Althausen PL, Shannon S, Watts C, Thomas K, Bain MA, Coll D, O’Mara TJ, Bray TJ. Early surgical stabilization of flail chest with locked plate fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25:641–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Granetzny A, Abd El-Aal M, Emam E, Shalaby A, Boseila A. Surgical versus conservative treatment of flail chest. Evaluation of the pulmonary status. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4:583–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lardinois D, Krueger T, Dusmet M, Ghisletta N, Gugger M, Ris HB. Pulmonary function testing after operative stabilisation of the chest wall for flail chest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:496–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bottlang M, Helzel I, Long W, Fitzpatrick D, Madey S. Less-invasive stabilization of rib fractures by intramedullary fixation: a biomechanical evaluation. J Trauma. 2010;68:1218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell N, Richardson M, Antippa P. Biomechanical testing of two devices for internal fixation of fractured ribs. J Trauma. 2010;68(5):1234–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983;16:87–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:102–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault J-C. Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993;16:5–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ragnarsdóttir M, Kristinsdóttir EK. Breathing movements and breathing patterns among healthy men and women 20–69 years of age. Reference values. Respiration. 2006;73:48–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moll JMH, Wright V. An objective clinical study of chest expansion. Ann Rheum Dis. 1972;31:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Finsbäck C, Mannerkorpi K. Spinal and thoracic mobility—age-related reference values for healthy men and women. Nordisk Fysioterapi. 2005;9:136–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olsén MF, Lindstrand H, Broberg JL, Westerdahl E. Measuring chest expansion; a study comparing two different instructions. Adv Physiother. 2011;13:128–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Viitanen JV, Suni J, Kautiainen H, Liimatainen M, Takala H. Effect of physiotherapy on spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis. Scan J Rheumatol. 1992;21:38–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salén BA, Spangfort EV, Nygren AL, Nordemar R. The Disability Rating Index: an instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1423–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grimby G. Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1986;711:233–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiamma MN, Samara Z, Baconnier P, Similowski T, Straus C. Respiratory inductive plethysmography to assess respiratory variability and complexity in humans. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007;156:234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Olsén MF, Romberg K. Reliability of the respiratory movement measuring instrument, RMMI. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010;30:349–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunnesson IL, Olsén MF. Validity in measuring breathing movements with the respiratory movement measuring instrument, RMMI. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011;31(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Fagevik Olsén.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagevik Olsén, M., Pazooki, D. & Granhed, H. Recovery after stabilising surgery for ‘flail chest’. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39, 501–506 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0293-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0293-3

Keywords

Navigation