Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of implant design on the method of failure for three implants designed for use in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: the dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS blade and X-BOLT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The dynamic hip screw (DHS) has been widely adopted as the implant of choice in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. There have been attempts over the years to improve on the DHS lag screw design in order to reduce failure in the form of “cut out”. The purpose of this study was to investigate how two new design variations of the DHS, the DHS blade and the X-BOLT, behave within bone, and if these design modifications do indeed improve the fixation achieved and lead to a reduction in failure due to cut out.

Methods

“Pushout” tests were chosen as the means of investigating the failure modes and patterns for these implants that lead to cut out. These pushout studies were performed in artificial bone substrate in the form of polyurethane foam blocks and in cadaveric femoral heads.

Results

The results demonstrated that each individual implant produces its own specific distinct force–displacement curve or pattern of failure, and that despite the very different implant designs and methods of fixation, all of the implants tested reached very similar peak forces in each of the test materials used.

Conclusion

The results demonstrated that implant design only influences the pattern of failure, and that the peak forces reached by each implant are determined by the quality of the bone or test material into which they are placed. However, altering the force–displacement curve or pattern of failure may be enough to improve the fixation achieved and to provide an increased resistance to cut out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1058–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Hip fractures: a practical guide to management. Berlin: Springer; 1999.

  3. Davis TRC, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72-B(1):26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James ETR, Hunter GA. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures—a review article. Injury. 1983;14(5):421–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schipper IB, Marti RK, Van der Werken C. Unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: extramedullary or intramedullary fixation—review of literature. Injury. 2004;35(2):142–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chirodian N, Arch B, Parker MJ. Sliding hip screw fixation of trochanteric hip fractures: outcome of 1024 procedures. Injury. 2005;36(6):793–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lustenberger A, Bekic J, Ganz R. Rotational instability of trochanteric fractures fixed with the dynamic hip screw. A radiological analysis. Unfallchirurg. 1995;98(10):514–7. German (PMID:7502084).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibson D, Keogh C, Morris S. A biomechanical study comparing the dynamic hip screw with an X-Bolt in an unstable intertrochanteric fracture model of the proximal femur. Presented at: BOA/IOA Combined Meeting; 2011 Sept 14; Dublin, Ireland.

  9. Richards RH, Evans G, Egan J, Shearer JR. The AO dynamic hip screw and the Pugh sliding nail in femoral head fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(5):794–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS. A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(3):352–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(8):544–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel PSD, Shepherd DET, Hukins DWL. Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Chapter 2. In: Hip fractures: a practical guide to management. Berlin: Springer; 1999.

Download references

Acknowledgments

None. This was a self-funded research project with no external assistance.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Applied Biomedical Engineering Research (CABER), Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering and Materials and Surface Science Institute (MSSI), University of Limerick, Co. Limerick, Ireland

    F. O’Neill, T. McGloughlin & M. Walsh

  2. Midwestern Regional Orthopaedic Hospital Croom/Midwestern Regional Hospital Dooradoyle Limerick, Co. Limerick, Ireland

    F. O’Neill, B. Lenehan & F. Condon

  3. Department of Surgery, Consultant General and Colorectal Surgeon, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Mid-Western Regional Hospitals, Limerick, Ireland

    J. C. Coffey

Authors
  1. F. O’Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. McGloughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Lenehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Condon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. C. Coffey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Walsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. O’Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Neill, F., McGloughlin, T., Lenehan, B. et al. Influence of implant design on the method of failure for three implants designed for use in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: the dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS blade and X-BOLT. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 39, 249–255 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0257-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0257-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation