Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anatomic Reconstruction of Malunited Chopart Joint Injuries

  • Focus on Midfoot Injuries
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractures and dislocations at the mid-tarsal (Chopart) joint are frequently overlooked or misinterpreted at first presentation. Inadequate joint reduction and stabilization almost invariably lead to painful malunions or nonunions, residual instability, and deformity. Because of the central position and the essential function of the mid-tarsal joint, malunions lead to a considerable impairment of global foot function and the rapid development of posttraumatic arthritis. While secondary anatomical reconstruction with joint preservation would be desirable in order to restore normal foot function, it is amenable only if no symptomatic arthritis or avascular necrosis is present. Over a course of 6 years, eight patients have been treated with secondary correction, joint realignment, and internal fixation. In four of these cases, nonunions of the tarsal navicular were debrided and bone-grafted; in the remaining cases, a corrective osteotomy at the navicular or cuboid was carried out. At 2 years followup, all but one patient were satisfied with the result. One patient underwent fusion of the talonavicular joint for avascular necrosis and collapse of the navicular. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) improved significantly from 38.8 preoperatively to 80.8 at follow-up. However, the majority of malunited mid-tarsal fracture-dislocations will require corrective fusion of the affected joint(s) with axial realignment because of manifest posttraumatic arthritis at the time of patient presentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Astion DJ, Deland JT, Otis JC, Kenneally S. Motion of the hind-foot after simulated arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:241–246.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deland JT, Otis JC, Lee KT, Kenneally SM. Lateral column lengthening with calcaneocuboid fusion: range of motion in the triple joint complex. Foot Ankle Int 1995;16:729–733.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wülker N, Stukenborg C, Savory KM, Alfke D. Hindfoot motion after isolated and combined arthrodeses: measurements in anatomic specimens. Foot Ankle Int 2000;21:921–927.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Main BJ, Jowett RL. Injuries of the midtarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975;57:89–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hermel MB, Gershon-Cohen J. The nutcracker fracture of the cuboid by indirect violence. Radiology 1953;60:850–854.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rammelt S, Grass R, Schikore H, Zwipp H. Verletzungen des Chopart-Gelenks. Unfallchirurg 2002;105:371–385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhillon MS, Nagi ON. Total dislocations of the navicular: are they ever isolated injuries? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:881–885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zwipp H. Chirurgie des Fußes. Wien: Springer, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zwipp H, Rammelt S. Posttraumatische Korrekturoperationen am Fuß. Zentralbl Chir 2003;128:218–226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zwipp H, Rammelt S. Korrektureingriffe nach Verletzungen des kindlichen Fußes. In: Weinberg A, Tscherne H, eds. Tscherne Unfallchirurgie: Unfallchirurgie im Kindesalter. Berlin: Springer; 2006:822–852.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kotter A, Wieberneit J, Braun W, Rüter A. Die Chopart-Luxation. Eine häufig unterschätzte Verletzung und ihre Folgen. Eine klinische Studie. Unfallchirurg 1997;100:737–741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rammelt S, Thielemann F, Zwipp H. Rekonstruktion fehlverheilter Chopart-Luxationsfrakturen. Fuß Sprungg 2009;7:105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK, Mosca V, Mayo KA, Hansen ST Jr. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:1504–1510.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Richter M, Thermann H, Hüfner T, Schmidt U, Goesling T, Krettek C. Chopart joint fracture-dislocation: initial open reduction provides better outcome than closed reduction. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:340–348.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rammelt S, Marti RK, Zwipp H. Arthrodese des Talonavikulargelenks. Orthopäde 2006;35:428–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rammelt S, Winkler J, Heineck J, Zwipp H. Anatomical reconstruction of malunited talus fractures. A prospective study of 10 patients followed for 4 years. Acta Orthop 2005;76:588–596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–353.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith RW, Shen W, Dewitt S, Reischl SF. Triple arthrodesis in adults with non-paralytic disease. A minimum ten-year followup study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:2707–2713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Suckel A, Müller O, Langenstein P, Herberts T, Reize P, Wülker N. Chopart’s joint load during gait. In vitro study of 10 cadaver specimen in a dynamic model. Gait Posture. 2008;27:216–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zwipp H, Gavlik JM, Rammelt S. Anatomische Rekonstruktion nach fehlverheilten zentralen Talusfrakturen. Fuß Sprungg 2009;7:88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ball ST, Jadin K, Allen RT, Schwartz AK, Sah RL, Brage ME. Chondrocyte viability after intra-articular calcaneal fractures in humans. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:665–668.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen ST Jr. Functional reconstruction of the foot and ankle. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Angus PD, Cowell HR. Triple arthrodesis. A critical long-term review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986;68:260–265.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Asencio G, Roeland A, Megy B, Bertin R, Fouque E, Leclerc V. Stabilisation de l’arriere-pied par arthrodese astragaloscaphoidienne. Resultats a propos de 50 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1995;81:691–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beischer AD, Brodsky JW, Pollo FE, Peereboom J. Functional outcome and gait analysis after triple or double arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20:545–553.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clain MR, Baxter DE. Simultaneous calcaneocuboid and talonavicular fusion. Long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994;76:133–136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fogel GR, Katoh Y, Rand JA, Chao EY. Talonavicular arthrodesis for isolated arthrosis: 9.5-year results and gait analysis. Foot Ankle 1982;3:105–113.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Rammelt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rammelt, S., Zwipp, H., Schneiders, W. et al. Anatomic Reconstruction of Malunited Chopart Joint Injuries. Eur J Trauma 36, 196–205 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-1036-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-1036-3

Key Words

Navigation