Abstract
Objectives:
The effect of the olive wire on the stiffness of external fixation was studied previously, but there is limited data on the effect of the olive wire positioning and tensioning characteristics on the stiffness of external fixation. This study evaluated the influence of olive wire positioning (medially, laterally, posteriorly, and anteriorly) and tensioning characteristics (tensioning one end or both ends) on the stiffness of ring external fixation.
Methods:
A fiberglass composite tibia fixed into an idealized ring external frame was tested. All mechanical testing was performed with a servo-hydraulic test frame (MTS Bionix 858, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Load–deformation behavior was compared among different wire design, olive wire positioning and tensioning characteristics under central axial compression, medial compression-bending, posterior compression-bending, posteromedial compression-bending and torsion. The differences between tension values on opposite ends of the wire during different modalities of olive wire tensioning were also investigated.
Results:
Olive wires tensioned on both ends provided significantly greater bending stiffness compared to smooth wires and olive wires tensioned only on the end opposite to the olive (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the tension values on opposite ends of the olive wire during tensioning (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Tensioning both ends of the olive wires and positioning the olives on the side of bending significantly increases the bending stiffness of ring external fixation. This work provides a rationale for clinical decision-making about the use of tensioned olive wires as opposed to smooth wires in ring external fixation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Antoci, V., Voor, M.J., Antoci, V. et al. Biomechanics of Olive Wire Positioning and Tensioning Characteristics. Eur J Trauma 32, 456–463 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-006-5091-8
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-006-5091-8