Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Unreamed Nailing of Diaphyseal and Metaphyseal Fractures of the Femur

Evaluation of Three Nailing and Locking Techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Trauma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Femoral intramedullary nails with antegrade or retrograde options for insertion and different locking possibilities have extended the indications to include both diaphyseal and metaphyseal fractures.

Patients and Methods: A prospective series of 63 patients were treated with three different unreamed nailing and interlocking techniques selected according to the predominant fracture location. Median age of the 30 women and 33 men was 39 (17–97) years. High-energy injuries had occurred in 37 patients. Antegrade nailing and interlocking with standard technique was used in 29 diaphyseal fractures, antegrade nailing and placement of the proximal locking device to the femoral head was performed in eleven proximal fractures with involvement of the intertrochanteric region, and retrograde nailing and standard interlocking was done in 23 mainly distal fractures.

Results: We encountered two types of major mechanical complications: angular malalignment and protrusion of the nail into the knee joint following compression in the fracture. Angular malalignment was found in four fractures. One midshaft fracture was fixed in a valgus reduction. Varus malalignment and loss of fixation occurred in two high subtrochanteric fractures after proximal locking with a spiral blade. In another midshaft fracture redisplacement in varus occurred. Compression in the fracture with protrusion of the nail by 2–10 mm into the knee joint following retrograde nailing was observed in six osteoporotic patients. Only two of these patients had significant knee problems. The median time to union – 4 months – did not differ significantly between the fixation groups.

Conclusions: Thus, there are still problems after nailing very proximal and distal fractures. Most postoperative complications were seen after retrograde nailing of distal fractures, but the consequences of fixation failure in very proximal fractures were worse. Nevertheless, a protocol that takes advantage of the different options for nail introduction and locking depending on the fracture location seems promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: January 6, 2002; revision accepted: October 8, 2002

Correspondence Address Karl Akke Alberts, MD, PhD, Department of Orthopedics, Karolinska Hospital, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden, Phone (+48/8) 517-70000, Fax -72695, e-mail: akke.alberts@ks.se

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alberts, K., Stark, A. Unreamed Nailing of Diaphyseal and Metaphyseal Fractures of the Femur . Eur J Trauma 28, 289–294 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-002-1197-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-002-1197-9

Navigation