References
Bry V, Saenz D, Pappas E et al (2022) End to end comparison of surface-guided imaging versus stereoscopic X‑rays for the SRS treatment of multiple metastases with a single isocenter using 3D anthropomorphic gel phantoms. J Applied Clin Med Phys 23(5):e13576. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13576
Kojima H, Takemura A, Kurokawa S et al (2021) Evaluation of technical performance of optical surface imaging system using conventional and novel stereotactic radiosurgery algorithms. J Applied Clin Med Phys 22(2):58–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
M. Schöpe, J. Sahlmann, S. Jaschik, A. Findeisen and G. Klautke declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schöpe, M., Sahlmann, J., Jaschik, S. et al. Reply to Letter to the Editor: Reply to comparison of patient setup accuracy for optical surface-guided and X-ray-guided imaging with respect to the impact on intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02226-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02226-6