Skip to main content
Log in

Dose–effect relationship between dose–volume parameters of residual gross tumor volume and clinical prognosis in MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the dose–effect relationship between the dose–volume parameters of residual gross tumor volume (GTVres) and clinical prognosis in MRI image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in our center.

Materials and method

The clinical data of 93 patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell cancer who received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with IGABT ± chemotherapy in our center were retrospectively analyzed. The disease stage, overall treatment time (OTT), chemotherapy, and the dose–volume parameters D90, D98, and D100 of GTVres, the intermediate-risk clinical target volume (CTVIR), and the high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) of the patients were statistically analyzed. Kaplan–Meier and uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to analyze 2‑year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control rate (LC). A probit model was employed to assess the dose–effect relationship between the volume and dose–volume parameters of GTVres and 2‑year OS, PFS, and LC.

Results

The median follow-up time was 19.6 months and 2‑year OS, PFS, and LC were 79.6%, 68.8%, and 94.6%, respectively. CTVHR D90 was an independent influencing factor for 2‑year PFS (P = 0.041); GTVresBT1 volume was an independent factor for 2‑year OS, PFS, and LC (P < 0.001). The probit model showed that at GTVresBT1 volume < 32.86 cm3, the expected 2‑year LC was > 90%; at GTVres D98 > 129.12 GyEQD2, the expected 2‑year OS was > 90%.

Conclusion

Both the volume and dose–volume parameters of GTVres are promising predictors in assessment of IGABT prognosis of cervical cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bethesda (2016) Prescribing, recording, and reporting brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix ICRU 89. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas 13:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndw042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suneja G, Brown D, Chang A, Erickson B, Fidarova E, Grover S, Mahantshetty U, Nag S, Narayan K, Bvochora-Nsingo M, Viegas C, Viswanathan AN, Lin MY, Gaffney D (2017) American Brachytherapy Society: Brachytherapy treatment recommendations for locally advanced cervix cancer for low-income and middle-income countries. Brachytherapy 16(1):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pötter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, Dumas I, Erickson B, Lang S, Nulens A, Petrow P, Rownd J, Kirisits C, GEC ESTRO Working Group (2006) Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol 78(1):67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2):228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoshida K, Jastaniyah N, Sturdza A, Lindegaard J, Segedin B, Mahantshetty U, Rai B, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Haie-Meder C, Sasaki R, Pötter R (2015) Assessment of parametrial response by growth pattern in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB and IIIB cervical cancer: Analysis of patients from a prospective, multicenter trial (EMBRACE). Int J Radiat Oncol 93(4):788–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimopoulos JC, Schard G, Berger D, Lang S, Goldner G, Helbich T, Pötter R (2006) Systematic evaluation of MRI findings in different stages of treatment of cervical cancer: Potential of MRI on delineation of target, pathoanatomic structures, and organs at risk. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64(5):1380–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Viswanathan AN, Dimopoulos J, Kirisits C, Berger D, Pötter R (2007) Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(2):491–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwai Y, Nemoto MW, Horikoshi T, Kanazawa A, Kurokawa M, Saito M, Harada R, Kobayashi H, Uno T (2020) Comparison of CT-based and MRI-based high-risk clinical target volumes in image guided-brachytherapy for cervical cancer, referencing recommendations from the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) and consensus statement guidelines from the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC ESTRO). Jpn J Radiol 38(9):899–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00980-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Minkoff D, Gill BS, Kang J, Beriwal S (2015) Cervical cancer outcome prediction to high-dose rate brachytherapy using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of tumor response to external beam radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 115(1):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyk P, Jiang N, Sun B, DeWees TA, Fowler KJ, Narra V, Garcia-Ramirez JL, Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW (2014) Cervical gross tumor volume dose predicts local control using magnetic resonance imaging/diffusion-weighted imaging—Guided high-dose-rate and positron emission Tomography/computed Tomography—guided intensity modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90(4):794–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pötter R, Tanderup K, Kirisits C, de Leeuw A, Kirchheiner K, Nout R, Tan LT, Haie-Meder C, Mahantshetty U, Segedin B, Hoskin P, Bruheim K, Rai B, Huang F, Van Limbergen E, Schmid M, Nesvacil N, Sturdza A, Fokdal L, Jensen NBK, Georg D, Assenholt M, Seppenwoolde Y, Nomden C, Fortin I, Chopra S, van der Heide U, Rumpold T, Lindegaard JC, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I (2018) The EMBRACE II study: The outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 9:48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YJ, Kim JY, Kim Y, Lim YK, Jeong J, Jeong C, Kim M, Lim MC, Seo SS, Park SY (2016) Magnetic resonance image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Prognostic factors for survival. Strahlenther Onkol 192(12):922–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-1049-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanderup K, Fokdal LU, Sturdza A, Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R, van Limbergen E, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Petric P, Hoskin P, Dörr W, Bentzen SM, Kirisits C, Lindegaard JC, Pötter R (2016) Effect of tumor dose, volume and overall treatment time on local control after radiochemotherapy including MRI guided brachytherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 120(3):441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, Bradley K, Campos SM, Cho KR, Chon HS, Chu C, Clark R, Cohn D, Crispens MA, Damast S, Dorigo O, Eifel PJ, Fisher CM, Frederick P, Gaffney DK, Han E, Huh WK, Lurain JR, Mariani A, Mutch D, Nagel C, Nekhlyudov L, Fader AN, Remmenga SW, Reynolds RK, Tillmanns T, Ueda S, Wyse E, Yashar CM, McMillian NR, Scavone JL (2019) Cervical cancer, version 3.2019. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 17(1):64–84. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimopoulos JC, Lang S, Kirisits C, Fidarova EF, Berger D, Georg P, Dörr W, Pötter R (2009) Dose-volume histogram parameters and local tumor control in MR image guided cervical cancer brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Villafranca E, Navarrete P, Sola A, Muruzabal JC, Aguirre S, Ostiz S, Sanchez C, Guarch R, Lainez N, Barrado M (2018) Image-guided brachytherapy in cervical cancer: Experience in the Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 23(6):510–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2018.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazeron R, Castelnau-Marchand P, Dumas I, del Campo ER, Kom LK, Martinetti F, Farha G, Tailleur A, Morice P, Chargari C, Lefkopoulos D, Haie-Meder C (2015) Impact of treatment time and dose escalation on local control in locally advanced cervical cancer treated by chemoradiation and image-guided pulseddose rate adaptive brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 114(2):257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chargari C, Mazeron R, Dunant A, Gouy S, Petit C, Maroun P, Uzan C, Annede P, Bentivegna E, Balleyguier C, Genestie C, Pautier P, Leary A, Lhomme C, Deutsch E, Morice P, Haie-Meder C (2016) Impact of primary para-aortic lymphadenectomy on distant failure in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated in the era of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Clin Exp Metastasis 33(8):775–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-016-9817-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schernberg A, Bockel S, Annede P, Fumagalli I, Escande A, Mignot F, Kissel M, Morice P, Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Deutsch E, Haie-Meder C, Chargari C (2018) Tumor shrinkage during chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer patients: prognostic significance, and impact for image-guided adaptive brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 102(3):220–S221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrič P, Hudej R, Rogelj P, Blas M, Tanderup K, Fidarova E, Kirisits C, Berger D, Dimopoulos JC, Pötter R, Hellebust TP (2013) Uncertainties of target volume delineation in MRI guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervix cancer: A multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 107(1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Han K, Croke J, Foltz W, Metser U, Xie J, Shek T, Driscoll B, Ménard C, Vines D, Coolens C, Simeonov A, Beiki-Ardakani A, Leung E, Levin W, Fyles A, Milosevic MF (2016) A prospective study of DWI, DCE-MRI and FDG PET imaging for target delineation in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 120(3):519–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82073331, 81201737, 31600679, 81703034, 82003208), the Project of Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province (grant numbers 20190303151SF, 20210401138YY), and the Horizontal Project of Jilin University (grant numbers 2019YX435, 2019155).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TK performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. GC and JW designed the study. GC performed manuscript review. NZ and XG performed patient follow-up and data collection. HZ, ZZ, and MZ devised the treatment plan. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanghui Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

T. Ke, J. Wang, N. Zhang, H. Zhao, X. Guo, Z. Zhao, Z. Mao, and G. Cheng declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

The authors Tianyang Ke and Jinbao Wang contributed equally to the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ke, T., Wang, J., Zhang, N. et al. Dose–effect relationship between dose–volume parameters of residual gross tumor volume and clinical prognosis in MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Strahlenther Onkol 199, 131–140 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-02000-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-022-02000-6

Keywords

Navigation