Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toxicity outcome of endorectal brachytherapy boost in medically inoperable patients

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

This communication reviews results and toxicity of image-guided high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDREBT) boost after external beam radiotherapy (ERT) in medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

A total of 18 patients with rectal cancer and clinical stage T2-4N0‑2 treated with HDREBT boost after ERT were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Following treatment with a median total dose (EQD2, α/β = 10) of 66 Gy (range 48–92 Gy), the incidence of early and late rectal grade 3 toxicity was 11% and 19%, respectively. There was no correlation between the occurrence of acute and late toxicity.

Conclusion

With proper technique, a combined approach using EBRT and HDREBT was associated with acceptable toxicity in medically inoperable rectal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Network NCC. Rectal Cancer (Version 1.2019). https://www.nccn.org/store/login/login.aspx?ReturnURL=https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf

  2. Rutten HJ, den Dulk M, Lemmens VE et al (2008) Controversies of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in elderly patients. Lancet Oncol 9:494–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne BE, Mamidanna R, Vincent CA et al (2013) Population-based cohort study comparing 30- and 90-day institutional mortality rates after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1810–1817

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Cummings B, Catton P et al (2005) Primary radical external beam radiotherapy of rectal adenocarcinoma: long term outcome of 271 patients. Radiother Oncol 77:126–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Appelt AL, Ploen J, Vogelius IR et al (2013) Radiation dose-response model for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:74–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vuong T, Devic S (2015) High-dose-rate pre-operative endorectal brachytherapy for patients with rectal cancer. jcb 7:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rijkmans EC, Cats A, Nout RA et al (2017) Endorectal brachytherapy boost after external beam radiation therapy in elderly or medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer: primary outcomes of the phase 1 HERBERT study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:908–917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Landberg T, Chavaudra J, Dobbs J et al (2016) Report 62. J Int Comm Radiat Units Meas os32:NP–NP

    Google Scholar 

  9. National Cancer Institute NIoH, US Department of Health and Human Services (2009) Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), version 4.0. NIH publication 09-7473. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/Archive/CTCAE_4.0_2009-05-29_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf

  10. Lindegaard J, Gerard JP, Myint SA et al (2007) Whither Papillon?—future directions for contact radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Clin Oncol 19:738–741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerard JP, Chapet O, Nemoz C et al (2004) Improved sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer with high dose rate pre-operative radiotherapy: the Lyon R96-02 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 22:2404–2409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Myint SA, Smith FM, Gollins S et al (2018) Dose escalation using contact X‑ray brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy as nonsurgical treatment option for rectal cancer: outcomes from a single-center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 100(3):565–573

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding sources

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to CL Chiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C.L. Chiang, S.F. Lee, V.W.Y. Lee, C.S.Y. Yeung, S.K.T. Cheung, M.C.M. Poon, D.C.C. Foo, S.H. Lo, K.O. Lam, F.A.S. Lee, F.C.S. Wong, and M.K.H. Chan declare that they have no competing interests.

This retrospective study has been approved by the University of Hong Kong and Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (HKU/HA HKW IRB). This has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiang, C., Lee, S., Lee, V. et al. Toxicity outcome of endorectal brachytherapy boost in medically inoperable patients. Strahlenther Onkol 196, 993–997 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01612-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01612-0

Keywords

Navigation