Abstract
Background and purpose
The aim of the study was to validate the use of linac-based radiosurgery in arteriovenous malformation (AVM) patients and to predict complications using an integrated logistic formula (ILF) in comparison with clinical outcomes.
Patients and methods
The results of radiosurgery in 92 AVM patients were examined. All patients were treated with linac-based radiosurgery. Of these, 70 patients were followed for 12–45 months (median, 24 months) and were analyzed. The treated volume varied from 0.09 to 26.95 cm³ (median, 2.3 cm³) and the median marginal dose was 20 Gy (range, 10.4–22). The median 12-Gy volume was 9.94 cm³ (range, 0.74–60.09 cm³). Patients and lesion characteristics potentially affecting nidus obliteration and excellent outcome were evaluated by performing a log-rank test and univariate and multivariate analyses. The risk for radiation injury (RRI) was calculated with an integrated logistic formula. The predictive power of the RRI was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results
Follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) angiography revealed complete AVM obliteration in 56 of 70 patients. The MR angiography confirmed an obliteration rate of 80%. The annual hemorrhage rate was 1.4% for the first 2 years after radiosurgery and 0% thereafter. The number of patients with an excellent outcome was 48 (68%). Factors associated with better obliteration were higher radiation dose to the lesion margins [12-Gy volume (V12) >10 cm³], small volume, and a Pollock-Flickinger score less than 1.49; those predicting excellent outcomes were V12<10 cm³, small volume, and Pollock-Flickinger score less than 1.49, as determined by multivariate analyses. Factors associated with radiation injury were V12>10 cm³ (p=0.03) and volume greater than 2 cm³ (p=0.001), as determined by a univariate analysis. The analyses showed an ROC of 0.66.
Conclusion
These data suggest that linac-based radiosurgery is effective. In terms of obliteration, excellent outcomes, and especially radiation injury, V12 and volume should be considered. The Flickinger formula seems to be applicable to Novalis-treated patients, but long-term follow-up is necessary for definite conclusions.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund und Zielsetzung
Das Ziel der Studie war es, die Verwendung der auf einem Linearbeschleuniger („“linear accelerator“, Linac) basierten Radiochirurgie bei Patienten mit arteriovenösen Malformationen (AVM) zu evaluieren und eine Vorhersage von Komplikationen mittels einer integrierten Logistikformel (ILF) im Vergleich mit klinischen Ergebnissen zu treffen.
Patienten und Methoden
Die Ergebnisse der Radiochirurgie bei 92 AVM-Patienten wurden untersucht. Alle Patienten wurden mit linacbasierter Radiochirurgie behandelt. Von diesen wurde bei 70 Patienten für 12–45 Monate (Median: 24) der Verlauf verfolgt und analysiert. Das behandelte Volumen variierte zwischen 0,09 und 26,95 cm3 (Median: 2,3 cm3) und die mittlere marginale Dosis betrug 20 Gy (Bereich: 10,4–22). Das mittlere 12-Gy-Volumen betrug 9,94 cm3 (Bereich: 0,74–60,09). Patienten- und Läsionenseigenschaften, die möglicherweise die Nidusauflösung und ein exzellentes Ergebnis beeinträchtigt haben, wurden mittels eines Log-Rank-Tests sowie univariater und multivariater Analysen ausgewertet. Das Risiko für Strahlenschäden (RRI) wurde mit einer ILF berechnet. Die Vorhersagekraft des RRI wurde durch Berechnung der Fläche unter der Receiver-Operating-Characteristic-(ROC)-Kurve beurteilt.
Ergebnisse
Die Nachsorge-Magnetresonanztomographie(MR)-Angiographie ergab eine vollständige AVM-Auflösung bei 56 von 70 Patienten. Die MR-angiographisch bestätigte Auflösung betrug 80%. Die jährliche Blutungsrate betrug während der ersten 2 Jahre nach Radiochirurgie 1,4% und danach null. Ein ausgezeichnetes Ergebnis wurde bei 48 Patienten (68%) erzielt. Die multivariate Analyse zeigte, dass folgende Faktoren mit einer besseren AVM-Auflösung assoziiert waren: höhere Strahlendosis auf den Läsionsgrenzen [12-Gy-Volumen (V12) >10 cm3], kleines Volumen, und Pollock-Flickinger-Score <1,49. Faktoren, die mit einem exzellenten Ergebnis in der multivariate Analyse assoziiert waren, waren ein V12 <10 cm3, ein kleines Volumen und ein Pollock-Flickinger-Score <1,49. Ein V12 >10 cm3 (p=0,03) und ein Volumen >2 cm3 (p=0,001) waren in einer univariaten Analyse mit Strahlenschäden assoziiert. Die Analysen zeigten eine ROC von 0,66.
Schlussfolgerung
Diese Daten lassen vermuten, dass linacbasierte Radiochirurgie wirksam ist. In Bezug auf die AVM-Auflösung, ein exzellentes Resultat und vor allem in Bezug auf Strahlenschäden zeigte sich, dass V12 und das Volumen evaluiert werden sollten. Die Flickinger-Formel scheint auf Patienten mit einer Novalis-Behandlung anwendbar zu sein. Jedoch ist eine Langzeituntersuchung für eine endgültige Beurteilung notwendig.
References
Flickinger JC, Pollock BE, Kondziolka D, Lunsfort LD (1996) A dose-response analysis of arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:873–879
Kjellberg R, Hanamura T, Davis K et al (1983) Bragg-peak proton-beam therapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med 309:269–273
Loeffler JS, Alexander E, Siddon R et al (1989) Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformations using a standard linear accelerator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:673–677
Aoki Y, Nakagawa K, Tago M et al (1996) Clinical evaluation of gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial arteriovenous malformation. Radiat Med 14:265–268
Friedman WA, Bova FJ, Bollampally S, Bradshaw P (2003) Analysis of factors predictive of success or complications in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 52:296–308
Pollock BE, Gorman DA, Coffey RJ (2003) Patient outcomes after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgical management: results based on a 5- to 14-year follow-up study. Neurosurgery 52:1291–1297
Ellis TL, Friedman WA, Bova FJ et al (1998) Analysis of treatment failure after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 89:104–110
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD (1998) Analysis of neurological sequelae from radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations: how location affects outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:273–278
Mavroidis P, Theodorou K, Lefkopoulos D et al (2002) Prediction of AVM obliteration after stereotactic radiotherapy using radiobiological modelling. Phys Med Biol 47:2471–2494
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Kalend AM et al (1995) Radiosurgery-related imaging changes in surrounding brain: multivariate analysis and model evaluation. In: Kondziolka D, Alexander E (eds) Radiosurgery1:229–236
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD (1997) Analysis of neurological sequelae from radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations: how location affects outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:273–278
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Pollock BE et al (1997) Complications from arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: multivariate analysis and risk modeling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:485–490
Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D et al (1992) Radiosurgery and brain tolerance: an analysis of neurodiagnostic imaging changes following gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23:19–26
Voges J, Treuer H, Lehrke R et al (1996) Risk analysis of linear accelerator radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 138:1055–1063
Lax I, Karlsson B (1996) Prediction of complications in gamma knife radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations. Acta Oncologica 35:49–55
Karlsson B, Lax I, Söderman M (1997) Factors influencing the risk for complications following gamma knife radiosurgery for cerebral malformations. Radiather Oncol 43:275–280
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD et al (2000) Development of a model to predict permanent symptomatic postradiosurgery injury for arteriovenous malformation patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46(5):1143–1148
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD et al (1999) A multi-institutional analysis of complication outcomes after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:67–74
Pollock BE, Flickinger JC (2002) A proposed radiosurgery-based grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 96:75–85
Flickinger JC, Schell MC, Larson DA (1990) Estimation of complications for linear accelerator radiosurgery with the integrated logistic formula. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19(1):143–148
Andrade-Souza YM, Zadeh G, Ramani M et al (2005) Testing the radiosurgery- based arteriovenous malformation score and the modified Spetzler-Martin grading system to predict radiosurgical outcome. J Neurosurg 103:642–648
Andrade-Souza YM, Ramani M, Scora D et al (2007) Embolization before radiosurgery reduces the obliteration rate of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 60(3):443–452
Oliveira E de, Tedeschi H, Raso J (1998) Comprehensive management of arteriovenous malformations. Neurol Res 20:673–683
Hamilton MG, Spetzler RF (1994) The prospective application of a grading system for arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 34:2–7
Heros RC, Korosue K, Diebold PM (1990) Surgical excision of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: late results. Neurosurgery 26:570–578
Fleetwood IG, Marcellus ML, Levy RP et al (2003) Deep arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia and thalamus: natural history. J Neurosurg 98:747–750
Andrade-Souza YM, Zadeh G, Scora D et al (2005) Radiosurgery for basal ganglia, internal capsule, and thalamus arteriovenous malformation: clinical outcome. Neurosurgery 56:56–65
Flickinger JC (1989) An integrated logistic formula for prediction of complications from radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:879–885
Miyawaki L, Dowd C, Wara W et al (1999) Five year results of linac radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: outcome for large AVMs. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44:1089–1106
Barker II FG, Butler WE, Lyons S et al (2003) Dose-volume prediction of radiation-related complications after proton beam radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 99:254–263
ApSimon HT, Reef H, Phadke RV, Popovic EA (2002) A population-based study of brain arteriovenous malformation: long-term treatment outcomes. Stroke 33:2794–2800
Karlsson B, Lindquist C, Johansson A, Steiner L (1997) Annual risk for the first hemorrhage from untreated cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Minim Invas Neurosurg 40:40–46
Karlsson B, Lax I, Soderman M (2001) Risk for hemorrhage during the 2 year latency period following gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:1045–1051
Nataf F, Ghossoub M, Schlienger M et al (2004) Bleeding after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 55:298–305
Shin M, Kawamoto S, Kurita H et al (2002) Retrospective analysis of a 10 year experience of stereotactic radio surgery for arteriovenous malformations in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 9:779–784
Schlienger M, Atlan D, Lefkopoulos D et al (2000) Linac radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: results in 169 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:1135–1142
Pollock BE, Gorman DA, Coffey RJ (2003) Patient outcome after arteriovenous malformation radiosurgical management: results based on a 5–14 year follow-up study. Neurosurgery 52:1291–1297
Friedman WA, Blatt DL, Bova FJ et al (1996) The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurgery 84:912–919
Friedman WA, Bova FJ, Mendenhall WM (1995) Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome. J Neurosurg 82:180–189
Bollet MA, Anxionnat R, Buchheit I et al (2004) Efficacy and morbidity of arc-therapy radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a comparison with the natural history. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1353–1363
Chang JH, Chang JW, Park YG, Chung SS (2000) Factors related to complete occlusion of arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 93:96–101
Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD (2002) An analysis of the dose-response for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery and other factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol 63:347–354
Liscak R, Vladyka V, Simonova G et al (2007) Arteriovenous malformations after Leksell gamma knife radiosurgery: rate of obliteration and complication. Neurosurgery 60:1005–1014
Pollock BE, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD et al (1998) Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 42:1239–1247
Blamek S, Tarnawski R, Miszczyk L (2011) Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 23(8):525–531. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2011.03.012
Herbert C, Moiseenko V, McKenzie M et al (2012) Factors predictive of symptomatic radiation injury after linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery for intracerebral arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83:872–877
Hayhurst C, Monsalves E, Prooijen M van et al (2012) Pretreatment predictors of adverse radiation effects after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(2):803–808
Fuetsch M, El Majdoub F, Hoevels M et al (2012) Stereotactic LINAC radiosurgery for the treatment of brainstem cavernomas. Strahlenther Onkol 188(4):311–316
D’Agostino GR, Autorino R, Pompucci A et al (2011) Whole-brain radiotherapy combined with surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with brain oligometastases: long-term analysis. Strahlenther Onkol 187(7):421–425
Ruge MI, Kocher M, Maarouf M et al (2011) Comparison of stereotactic brachytherapy (125 iodine seeds) with stereotactic radiosurgery (LINAC) for the treatment of singular cerebral metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 187(1):7–14
Fuetsch M, El Majdoub F, Hoevels M et al (2012) Stereotactic LINAC radiosurgery for the treatment of brainstem cavernomas. Strahlenther Onkol 188(4):311–316
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cetin, I., Ates, R., Dhaens, J. et al. Retrospective analysis of linac-based radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations and testing of the Flickinger formula in predicting radiation injury. Strahlenther Onkol 188, 1133–1138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0180-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-012-0180-6