Skip to main content
Log in

New Approach for Treatment of Vertebral Metastases Using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy*

Neue Methode für die Behandlung von vertebralen Metastasen mit intenstätsmodulierter Strahlentherapie

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose:

To perform aggressive radiotherapy for vertebral metastases. Using very steep dose gradients from intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), a protocol based on the concept of partial volume dose to the spinal cord was evaluated.

Patients and Methods:

50 patients with vertebral metastases were treated using IMRT. In previously unirradiated cases, where a prescribed dose of 80 Gy (BED10) was delivered, the constraint to the spinal cord should be less than 100 Gy (BED2). For previously irradiated cases, on the other hand, the dose is the same as in the previously unirradiated case; however, constraints for the spinal cord are a cumulative BED2 of less than 150 Gy, BED2 of less than 100 Gy in each instance, and a treatment gap of more than 6 months. There were 6 patients considered for a partial volume dose to the spinal cord. They all received higher BED2, ranging from 51–157 Gy of D1cc.

Results:

Among the 24 patients who survived longer than 1 year, there was 1 case of transient radiation myelitis. There were no other cases of spinal cord sequelae.

Conclusion:

Based on the present results, we recommend a BED2 of 100 Gy or less at D1cc as a constraint for the spinal cord in previously unirradiated cases, and a cumulative BED2 of 150 Gy or less at D1cc in previously irradiated cases, when the interval was not shorter than 6 months and the BED2 for each session was 100 Gy or less. The prescribed BED10 of 80 Gy could be safely delivered to the vertebral lesions.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund und Ziel:

Aggressive Strahlentherapie bei vertebralen Metastasen. Unter Einsatz sehr steiler Dosisgradienten intensitätsmodulierter Strahlentherapie (IMRT) Evaluierung eines Therapieprotokolls basierend auf dem Konzept der partiellen Volumendosierung am Rückenmark.

Patienten und Methodik:

Wir behandelten mit IMRT 50 Patienten mit Wirbelsäulenmetastasen. In Fällen ohne vorangegangene Strahlentherapie, bei denen eine verordnete Dosis von 80 Gy BED10 appliziert wurde, sollte die Belastung des Rückenmarks weniger als 100 Gy BED2 betragen. In Fällen mit vorheriger Strahlentherapie wurde die gleiche Dosis appliziert, wobei allerdings die Belastung des Rückenmarks kumulativ unter 150 Gy BED2 und in der Einzelapplikation bei weniger als 100 Gy BED2 lag, außerdem die Behandlungspause mehr als 6 Monate betrug. Für die partielle Volumendosierung am Rückenmark kamen 6 Patienten in Frage. Alle erhielten die höhere BED2 von mehr als 51 Gy bis zu 157 Gy D1cc.

Ergebnisse:

Unter 24 Patienten, die länger als ein Jahr überlebten, gab es einen Fall vorübergehender Strahlenmyelitis. Es wurden keine weiteren Fälle von Bestrahlungsfolgen am Rückenmark beobachtet.

Schlussfolgerung:

Auf Basis der vorliegenden Ergebnissen würden wir eine BED2 von 100 Gy oder weniger bei D1cc am Rückenmark in Fällen ohne vorangegangene Strahlentherapie empfehlen und in Fällen mit vorheriger Strahlentherapie eine kumulative BED2 von 150 Gy oder weniger bei D1cc, wenn das Behandlungsintervall nicht kürzer als 6 Monate war und die Dosis der Einzelapplikation bei einer BED2 von 100 Gy oder weniger lag. Die verordnete Dosis einer BED10 von 80 Gy bei Wirbelsäulenläsionen ließ sich sicher applizieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baba Y, Ohkubo K, Hamada K, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastasis: a case report. Nippon Acta Radiologica 1997;57:880–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, et al. Quantitative analysis of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:S3–S9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow E, Danjoux C, Wong R, et al. Palliation of bone metastases: a survey of patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol. 2000;56(3):305–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;15:109–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Freundt K, Meyners T, Bajrovic A, et al. Radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease in patients with spinal cord compression (MSCC) from relatively radioresistant tumors. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010;186:218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. JASTRO Database Committee, Teshima T, Numasaki H, et al. Japanese structure survey of Radiation Oncology on 2007 (first report). J Jpn Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2009;21:113–25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lammering G, De Ruysscher D, van Baardwijk A, et al. The use of FDG-PET to target tumors by radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2010;186:471–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, et al. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:S10–S19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Masala S, Roselli M, Massari F, et al. Radiofrequency heat ablation and vertebroplasty in the treatment of neoplastic vertebral body fractures. Anticancer 2004;24:3129–33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meisner J, Meyer A, Polivka B, et al. Outcome of moderately dosed radiosurgery for limited brain metastases. Report of a single-center experience. Strahlenther Onkol 2010;186:76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nieder C, Grosu AL, Andratschke NH, et al. Update of human spinal cord reirradiation tolerance based on additional data from 38 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;66:1446–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porter AT, McEwan AJB, Powe JE, et al. Results of a randomized phase-III trial to evaluate the efficacy of strontium-89 adjuvant to local field external beam irradiation in the management of endocrine resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;25:805–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rades D, Dahm-Daphi J, Rudat V, et al. Is short-course radiotherapy with high doses per fraction the appropriate regimen for metastatic spinal cord compression in colorectal cancer patients? Strahlenther Onkol 2006;182:708–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson RG. Strontium-89 precursor targeted therapy for pain relief of blastic metastatic disease. Cancer 1993;72(11 Suppl):3433–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin P, Casarett GW. A direction for clinical radiation pathology. Front Radiation Ther Onc 1972;6:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryu S, Jin JY, Jin R, et al. Partial volume tolerance of the spinal cord and complications of single-dose radiosurgery. Cancer 2007;109:628–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salazar OM, Sandhu T, da Motta NW, et al. Fractionated half-body irradiation (HBI) for the rapid palliation of widespread, symptomatic, metastatic bone disease: a randomized phase III trial of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;50:765–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Souchon R, Wenz F, Sedlmayer F, et al. DEGRO practice guidelines for palliative radiotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: bone metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Strahlenther Onkol 2009;185: 417–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steenland E, Leer JW, van Houwelingen H, et al. The effect of a single fraction compared to multiple fractions on painful bone metastases: a global analysis of the Dutch Bone Metastasis study. Radiother Oncol 1999;52: 101–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong D, Gillick L, Hendrickson FR. The palliation of symptomatic osseous metastases: final results of the study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer 1982;50:893–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van den Hout WB, van der Linden YM, Steenland E, et al. Single- versus multiple-fraction radiotherapy in patients with painful bone metastases: cost-utility analysis based on a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:222–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshihiko Inoue MD (Prof. Emeritus).

Additional information

*This paper was presented at the 15th Workshop of German–Japanese Radiological Affiliation in Tokyo, Japan, on 23 May 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inoue, T., Oh, RJ. & Shiomi, H. New Approach for Treatment of Vertebral Metastases Using Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy*. Strahlenther Onkol 187, 108–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-010-2187-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-010-2187-1

Key Words

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation