Skip to main content
Log in

Behandlung von Vorhofflimmern in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin

Treatment of atrial fibrillation in intensive care units and emergency departments

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Vorhofflimmern ist die häufigste Herzrhythmusstörung auf Notfall- und Intensivstationen und mit einer erhöhten Morbidität und Mortalität assoziiert. Diese Rhythmusstörung kann bei kritisch kranken Patienten zu hämodynamischer Instabilität und kardiogenem Schock führen. Die Mechanismen für die Entstehung von Vorhofflimmern sowie dessen Behandlung unterscheiden sich bei kritisch kranken Patienten grundlegend von denen bei Patienten im ambulanten Umfeld.

Diagnostik und Therapie

Bei neu aufgetretenem Vorhofflimmern sollen die hämodynamischen Auswirkungen beurteilt und die reversible Auslösefaktoren optimiert werden. Hämodynamisch instabile Patienten benötigen eine rasche Behandlung zur Wiederherstellung eines adäquaten Perfusionsdrucks. Die rasche Wiederherstellung des Sinusrhythmus spielt häufig eine zentrale Rolle in der hämodynamischen Stabilisierung. Die elektrische Kardioversion, wenn möglich nach Vorbehandlung mit einem Antiarrhythmikum zur Erhöhung der Erfolgschance, ist eine wichtige therapeutische Maßnahme. Bei stabilen Patienten soll initial eine Frequenzkontrolle mit einem kurzwirksamen intravenösen β-Blocker eingeleitet werden. Eine Konversion in den Sinusrhythmus kann häufig medikamentös versucht werden. Neu steht dafür Vernakalant, ein vorhofspezifischer Multikanalblocker, zur Verfügung.

Evaluation

Nach 48 h mit Vorhofflimmern sollten alle Patienten zur Vermeidung kardioembolischen Ereignisse bezüglich Indikation zur Antikoagulation evaluiert werden. Erfreulicherweise persistiert Vorhofflimmern nach Abheilung der akuten Krankheit selten.

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients hospitalized in intensive care units and emergency departments and is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. In critically ill patients, atrial fibrillation can cause hemodynamic instability and cardiogenic shock. The mechanisms and the management of atrial fibrillation are significantly different in critically ill patients compared to outpatients.

Diagnosis and treatment

The initial management includes the evaluation of the hemodynamic consequences of new-onset atrial fibrillation and the optimization of reversible causes. In patients with hemodynamic instability the rapid restoration of an adequate perfusion pressure is the initial goal. Often, a rapid conversion in sinus rhythm is required to achieve hemodynamic stabilization. Electrical cardioversion, if possible performed after pretreatment with an antiarrhythmic drug to increase the success rate, frequently plays a central role in the conversion to sinus rhythm of hemodynamically unstable patients. Stable patients are initially treated with a short-acting intravenous β-blocker to achieve heart rate control. A conversion to sinus rhythm may be achieved pharmacologically with vernakalant, an atrial-specific multichannel blocker.

Evaluation

All patients with atrial fibrillation lasting more than 48 h should be evaluated for anticoagulation in order to reduce cardio-embolic complications. After recovering from the acute illness, atrial fibrillation persists only in a minority of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Arrigo M, Bettex D, Rudiger A (2014) Management of atrial fibrillation in critically Ill patients. Crit Care Res Pract 2014:840615

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, Ng C-K, Lamm G, Eber B (2005) Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 20(5):425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Camm AJ, Capucci A, Hohnloser SH et al (2011) A randomized active-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of vernakalant to amiodarone in recent-onset atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(3):313–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Camm AJ, Lip GYH, De Caterina R et al (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 33(21):2719–2747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunning J, Treasure T, Versteegh M, Nashef SAM, EACTS Audit and Guidelines Committee (2006) Guidelines on the prevention and management of de novo atrial fibrillation after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30(6):852–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. European Heart Rhythm Association, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Camm AJ et al (2010) Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 31(19):2369–2429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garnock-Jones KP (2012) Esmolol: a review of its use in the short-term treatment of tachyarrhythmias and the short-term control of tachycardia and hypertension. Drugs 72(1):109–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glover BM, Walsh SJ, McCann CJ et al (2008) Biphasic energy selection for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. The BEST AF Trial. Heart 94(7):884–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heeringa J, van der Kuip DAM, Hofman A et al (2006) Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J 27(8):949–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Issac TT, Dokainish H, Lakkis NM (2007) Role of inflammation in initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the published data. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(21):2021–2028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanji S, Williamson DR, Yaghchi BM, Albert M, McIntyre L, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group (2012) Epidemiology and management of atrial fibrillation in medical and noncardiac surgical adult intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care 27(3):326.e1–326.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan IA (2003) Atrial stunning: basics and clinical considerations. Int J Cardiol 92(2–3):113–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein AL, Grimm RA, Murray RD et al (2001) Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 344(19):1411–1420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein I, Ojamaa K (2001) Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med 344(7):501–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kowey PR, Dorian P, Mitchell LB et al (2009) Vernakalant hydrochloride for the rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2(6):652–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kowey PR, Stebbins D, Igidbashian L et al (2001) Clinical outcome of patients who develop PAF after CABG surgery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 24(2):191–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mayr A, Ritsch N, Knotzer H et al (2003) Effectiveness of direct-current cardioversion for treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, in particular atrial fibrillation, in surgical intensive care patients. Crit Care Med 31(2):401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meierhenrich R, Steinhilber E, Eggermann C et al (2010) Incidence and prognostic impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 14(3):R108

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moran JL, Gallagher J, Peake SL, Cunningham DN, Salagaras M, Leppard P (1995) Parenteral magnesium sulfate versus amiodarone in the therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med 23(11):1816–1824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Opolski G, Stanisławska J, Górecki A, Swiecicka G, Torbicki A, Kraska T (1997) Amiodarone in restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after unsuccessful direct-current cardioversion. Clin Cardiol 20(4):337–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Packer DL, Bardy GH, Worley SJ et al (1986) Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy: a reversible form of left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 57(8):563–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pratt CM, Roy D, Torp-Pedersen C et al (2010) Usefulness of vernakalant hydrochloride injection for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 106(9):1277–1283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roy D, Talajic M, Nattel S et al (2008) Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med 358(25):2667–2677. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0708789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudiger A, Breitenstein A, Arrigo M, Salzberg SP, Bettex D (2014) Suitability, efficacy, and safety of vernakalant for new onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patients. Crit Care Res Pract 2014:826286

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Samokhvalov AV, Irving HM, Rehm J (2010) Alcohol consumption as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 17(6):706–712

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmitt J, Duray G, Gersh BJ, Hohnloser SH (2009) Atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of the incidence, clinical features and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J 30(9):1038–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schotten U, Verheule S, Kirchhof P, Goette A (2011) Pathophysiological mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: a translational appraisal. Physiol Rev 91(1):265–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Gelder IC, Groenveld HF, Crijns HJGM et al (2010) Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 362(15):1363–1373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wyse D, Waldo A, DiMarco J et al (2002) A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347(23):1825–1833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zimetbaum P (2007) Amiodarone for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 356(9):935–941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rudiger.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Rudiger gibt an, Honorare von den Firmen AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG und Baxter Deutschland GmbH für Vorträge erhalten zu haben. Diese Firmen vertreiben Esmolol in Europa.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

M. Buerke, Siegen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arrigo, M., Bettex, D. & Rudiger, A. Behandlung von Vorhofflimmern in der Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 110, 614–620 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-015-0006-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-015-0006-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation