Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Journal Club

  • JOURNAL CLUB
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, van Eijck CHJ, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med 2010;362: 129–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Straumann A, Conus S, Grzonka P, et al. Anti-interleukin-5 antibody treatment (mepolizumab) in active eosinophilic oesophagitis: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double blind trial. Gut 2010; 59:21–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Beaugerie L, Brousse N, Bouvier AM, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders in patients receiving thiopurines for inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 2009; 374:1617–1625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Piccini JP, Hasselblad V, Peterson ED, et al. Comparative efficacy of dronedarone and amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1089–1095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Touboul P, Brugada J, Capucci A, et al. Dronedarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation: a dose-ranging study. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1481–1487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh BN, Connolly SJ, Crijns HJ, et al. Dronedarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter. N Engl J Med 2007;357:987–999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hohnloser SH, Crijns HJ, van Eickels M, et al. Effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular events in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009;360:668–678.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kochiadakis GE, Igoumenidis NE, Marketou ME, et al. Low dose amiodarone and sotalol in the treatment of recurrent, symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a comparative, placebo controlled study. Heart 2000;84:251–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galperin J, Elizari MV, Chiale PA, et al. Efficacy of amiodarone for the termination of chronic atrial fibrillation and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double blind trial. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2001;6:341–350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Channer KS, Birchall A, Steeds RP, et al. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of pre-treatment and short- or long-term maintenance therapy with amiodarone supporting DC cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2004;25:144–150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh BN, Singh SN, Reda DJ, et al. Amiodarone versus sotalol for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1861–1872.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Heuzey J-Y, De Ferrari GM, Radzik D, et al. A short-term, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus amiodarone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the DIONYSOS study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol: in press (Epub 2010 Apr 06).

  10. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators. Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1989;321:406–412.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Eng J Med 2002; 347:1825–1833.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. Lancet 1999;354:708–715.

  2. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Clayton TC, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:743–751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1879–1887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, for the Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) Investigators. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1095–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goto K, Lansky AJ, Fahy M, et al. Predictors of outcomes in medically treated patients with acute coronary syndromes after angiographic triage: an Acute Catheterization And Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) substudy. Circulation 2010;121:853–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, et al., for the ACUITY Investigators. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2203–2216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Califf RM, Phillips HR III, Hindmann MC, et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1055–1063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, et al., for the GRACE Investigators. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients wit acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:358–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Dunstan DW, Barr ELM, Healy GN, et al. Television viewing time and mortality. The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation 2010;121:384–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Owen N, et al. Physical activity and television viewing in relation to risk of undiagnosed abnormal glucose metabolism in adults. Diabetes Care 2004;11:2603–2609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prasad DS, Das BC. Physical inactivity: a cardiovascular risk factor. Indian J Med Sci 2009;63:33–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995;273:402–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vierbraucher in Europa: Zahlen, Daten, Fakten. Daten 1996–2000. Luxemburg: Amt für Veröffentlichungen der EU, 2002:222 (http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/topics/catalogue_eurostat_de.pdf).

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Journal Club. Med Klin 105, 439–449 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-010-1076-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-010-1076-9

Search

Navigation