Skip to main content
Log in

Die Nierenarterienstenose

Pathophysiologie – Diagnostik – Therapie

Renal Artery Stenosis. Pathophysiology – Diagnosis – Therapy

  • ÜBERSICHT
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die Prävalenz der Nierenarterienstenose (NAST) in der Altersgruppe > 65 Jahre wird in der Literatur mit 6,8% angegeben. Bei Patienten mit bekannter oder vermuteter Arteriosklerose, bei denen eine Darstellung der Nierenarterien im Rahmen einer Koronarangiographie durchgeführt wird, findet sich eine deutlich höhere Häufigkeit von 11–23%. Trotz dieser hohen Prävalenz sind die Indikationen zur Revaskularisation umstritten. Die Anzahl interventioneller Eingriffe an Nierenarterien hat zugenommen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass bis zu 40% der Patienten weder im Hinblick auf die arterielle Hypertonie noch im Hinblick auf die Nierenfunktion von diesem Eingriff profitieren. Diese Tatsache unterstreicht, dass bei der Therapieentscheidung sowohl morphologische als auch funktionelle Aspekte berücksichtigt werden müssen. Zur morphologischen Evaluation einer NAST stehen heute die Computertomographie, die Magnetresonanztomographie sowie als Goldstandard die Angiographie zur Verfügung. Als wichtigstes funktionelles Verfahren ist die Doppler-Sonographie zu nennen, aber auch die intravasale Druck- und Flussmessung stellen wichtige Methoden dar, deren prädiktive Wertigkeit im Hinblick auf den Langzeiterfolg einer Intervention jedoch noch untersucht werden muss. Obwohl die perkutane Revaskularisation einer NAST im Vergleich zum operativen Vorgehen mit einer deutlich geringeren Komplikationsrate einhergeht, muss immer berücksichtigt werden, dass durch die notwendige Kontrastmittelgabe auch eine Verschlechterung der Nierenfunktion verursacht werden kann und dass daher eine sorgfältige Indikationsstellung wichtig ist.

Abstract

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is both a common and progressive disease and its prevalence in patients > 65 years is 6.8%. In patients with known or suspected atherosclerosis undergoing coronary angiography, a frequency of even 11–23% is reported in the literature. Despite this high prevalence, there is an ongoing discussion about the indications for revascularization and it is currently unclear, whether renal artery revascularization reduces adverse cardiovascular and renal events. Nevertheless, the number of interventions for RAS is rising steadily, although up to 40% of patients do not profit from this intervention. This fact underlines the necessity of a thorough diagnostic work-up before intervention, integrating morphological and functional tests. For morphological evaluation, multislice computed tomography, magnetic resonance tomography or digital subtraction angiography can be done. In experienced centers, Doppler ultrasound can serve as an excellent functional tool, to assess the physiological relevance of an RAS, but also invasive measurements of pressure and flow provide valuable information about the significance of stenoses; however, these methods will have to be assessed with respect to their value to predict long-term outcome. Although percutaneous intervention of RAS is associated with a substantially lower risk of major adverse events as compared to surgery, by using contrast media this procedure holds the risk of deterioration of renal function and of a small number of procedure-dependent complications as well. Thus, a careful consideration of pros and cons of this procedure is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Beutler JJ, Van Ampting JM, Van De Ven PJ, et al. Long-term effects of arterial stenting on kidney function for patients with ostial atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and renal insufficiency. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:1475–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum U, Krumme B, Flugel P, et al. Treatment of ostial renal-artery stenoses with vascular endoprostheses after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1997;336:459–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Böhm M, Fries R, Hennen B, et al. Indications for renal angiography and for percutaneous transluminal renal artery dilatation: interdisciplinary consensus statement regarding renal artery stenosis. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2003;128:150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burket MW, Cooper CJ, Kennedy DJ, et al. Renal artery angioplasty and stent placement: predictors of a favourable outcome. Am Heart J 2000;139:64–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Caps MT, Perissinotto C, Zierler RE, et al. Prospective study of atherosclerotic disease progression in the renal artery. Circulation 1998;98:2866–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper CJ, Haller ST, Colyer W, et al. Embolic protection and platelet inhibition during renal artery stenting. Circulation 2008;117:2752–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper CJ, Murphy TP. Is renal artery stenting the correct treatment of renal artery stenosis? Circulation 2007;115:263–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Matsumoto A, et al. Stent revascularization for the prevention of cardiovascular and renal events among patients with renal artery stenosis and systolic hypertension: rationale and design of the CORAL trial. Am Heart J 2006;152:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson C, Stacul F, McCullough PA, et al., CIN Consensus Working Panel. Contrast medium use. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:42K–58K.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Bruyne B, Manoharan G, Pijls NH, et al. Assessment of renal artery stenosis severity by pressure gradient measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1851–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dworkin LD, Jamerson KA. Case against angioplasty and stenting of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Circulation 2007;115:271–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein FH. Oxygen and renal metabolism. Kidney Int 1997;51:381–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Farmer CK, Cook GJ, Blake GM, et al. Individual kidney function in atherosclerotic nephropathy is not related to the presence of renal artery stenosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2880–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldblatt H, Lynch J, Hanzal RJ, et al. Studies on experimental hypertension I. The production of persistent elevation of systolic blood pressure by means of renal ischemia. J Exp Med 1934;59:347–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen KJ, Edwards MS, Craven TE, et al. Prevalence of renovascular disease in the elderly: a population-based study. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:443–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harden PN, MacLeod MJ, Rodger RS, et al. Effect of renal-artery stenting on progression of renovascular renal failure. Lancet 1997;349:1133–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hennekens CH, Dyken ML, Fuster V. Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1997;96:2751–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, et al. Endothelial function and oxidative stress in renovascular hypertension. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1954–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al., American Association for Vascular Surgery; Society for Vascular Surgery; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society of Interventional Radiology; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; Vascular Disease Foundation. ACC/AHA 2005 practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation 2006;113:e463–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hricik DE, Browning PJ, Kopelman R, et al. Captopril-induced functional renal insufficiency in patients with bilateral renal-artery stenoses or renal-artery stenosis in a solitary kidney. N Engl J Med 1983;308:373–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ives NJ, Wheatley K, Stowe RL, et al. Continuing uncertainty about the value of percutaneous revascularization in atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Johansson M, Elam M, Rundqvist B, et al. Increased sympathetic nerve activity in renovascular hypertension. Circulation 1999;99:2537–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones NJ, Bates ER, Chetcuti SJ, et al. Usefulness of translesional pressure gradient and pharmacological provocation for the assessment of intermediate renal artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2006;68:429–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalra PA, ASTRAL Collaborative Group. The impact of renal revascularisation in atherosclerotic disease: the Angioplasty and Stenting for Renal Artery Lesions (ASTRAL) trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:Suppl:abstract.

  25. Korner PI. Cardiovascular hypertrophy and hypertension: causes and consequences. Blood Press 1995;2:6–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kribben A, Witzke O, Hillen U, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis - pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009:in press.

  27. Krijnen P, van Jaarsveld BC, Steyerberg EW, et al. A clinical prediction rule for renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:705–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Leertouwer TC, Gussenhoven EJ, Bosch JL, et al. Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? A meta-analysis. Radiology 2000;216:78–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liard JF, Cowley AW Jr, McCaa RE, et al. Renin, aldosterone, body fluid volumes, and the baroreceptor reflex in the development and reversal of Goldblatt hypertension in conscious dogs. Circ Res 1974;34:549–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Loesch J. Ein Beitrag zur experimentellen Nephritis und zum arteriellen Hochdruck. III. Die Veränderungen in den Geweben. Zentralbl Inn Med 1933;8:177–85.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lonn EM, Yusuf S, Jha P, et al. Emerging role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in cardiac and vascular protection. Circulation 1994;90:2056–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Losito A, Errico R, Santirosi P, et al. Long-term follow-up of atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Beneficial effect of ACE inhibition. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:1604–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. MacDowall P, Kalra PA, O’Donoghue DJ, et al. Risk of morbidity from renovascular disease in elderly patients with congestive cardiac failure. Lancet 1998;352:13–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mistry S, Ives N, Harding J, et al. Angioplasty and STent for Renal Artery Lesions (ASTRAL trial): rationale, methods and results so far. J Hum Hypertens 2007;21:507–8.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mitchell JA, Subramanian R, White CJ, et al. Predicting blood pressure improvement in hypertensive patients after renal artery stent placement: renal fractional flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:685–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Murphy TP, Soares G, Kim M. Increase in utilization of percutaneous renal artery interventions by Medicare beneficiaries, 1996-2004. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:561–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Plouin PF, Chatellier G, Darne B, et al. Blood pressure outcome of angioplasty in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a randomized trial. Hypertension 1998;31:822–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Radermacher J, Chavan A, Bleck J, et al. Use of Doppler ultrasonography to predict the outcome of therapy for renal artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2001;344:410–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Radermacher J, Chavan A, Schaffer J, et al. Detection of significant renal artery stenosis with color Doppler sonography: combining extrarenal and intrarenal approaches to minimize technical failure. Clin Nephrol 2000;53:333–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rocha-Singh K, Jaff MR, Rosenfield K, ASPIRE-2 Trial Investigators. Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of renal artery stenting after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty: the ASPIRE-2 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:776–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Slovut DP, Olin JW. Fibromuscular dysplasia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1862–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Suresh M, Laboi P, Mamtora H, et al. Relationship of renal dysfunction to proximal arterial disease severity in atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000;15:631–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Textor SC. Renovascular hypertension in 2007: where are we now? Curr Cardiol Rep 2007;9:453–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tobe SW, Atri M, Perkins N, et al. Renal atherosclerotic revascularization evaluation (RAVE study): study protocol of a randomized trial [NCT00127738]. BMC Nephrol 2007;26:8:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Van de Ven PJ, Kaatee R, Beutler JJ, et al. Arterial stenting and balloon angioplasty in ostial atherosclerotic renovascular disease: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;353:282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Jaarsveld BC, Krijnen P, Pieterman H, et al., for the Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group. The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1007–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vasbinder GB, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AG, et al. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:401–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Vetrovec GW, Landwehr DM, Edwards VL. Incidence of renal artery stenosis inhypertensive patients undergoing coronary angiography. J Interv Cardiol 1989;2:69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Webster J, Marshall F, Abdalla M, et al. Randomised comparison of percutaneous angioplasty vs continued medical therapy for hypertensive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis. J Hum Hypertens 1998;12:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. White CJ, Ramee SR, Collins TJ, et al. Renal artery stent placement: utility in lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:1445–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Witze O, Hillen U, Barkhausen J, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis - a new interdisciplinary challenge. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2007;132:2706–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wright JR, Shurrab AE, Cheung C, et al. A prospective study of the determinants of renal functional outcome and mortality in atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:1153–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zähringer M, Sapoval M, Pattynama PM, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal low-profile stent for renal artery treatment (GREAT trial): angiographic follow-up after 6 months and clinical outcome up to 2 years. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:460–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zeller T, Frank U, Muller C, et al. Stent-supported angioplasty of severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis preserves renal function and improves blood pressure control: long-term results from a prospective registry of 456 lesions. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:95–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinrich Wieneke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wieneke, H., Konorza, T.F.M., Eggebrecht, H. et al. Die Nierenarterienstenose. Med Klin 104, 349–355 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-009-1073-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-009-1073-z

Schlüsselwörter:

Key Words:

Navigation