Abstract
Background and Purpose
The prognosis of untreated spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) is poor. Embolization plays an important role in the management of intramedullary SAVMs. Delayed aggravation due to spinal venous thrombosis following successful embolization has been reported; however, perioperative management strategies to prevent thrombosis have not been explored. We present our single-center experience of SAVM embolization and perioperative management, including anticoagulation.
Material and Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 18 patients with SAVMs who underwent transarterial embolization. Perioperative anticoagulation therapy was administered to selected patients. We compared the characteristics of the patients, including perioperative management procedures, between those with and without postoperative worsening following embolization.
Results
Acute postoperative worsening within 1 week occurred in 4 (22.2%) patients. Of these, immediate worsening was observed in one patient as a procedure-related complication. Delayed worsening after 24 h was observed in 3 patients, caused by delayed venous thrombosis with severe back pain. Rescue anticoagulation for delayed worsening improved symptoms in two patients. A comparison between patients with and without acute postoperative worsening revealed significant differences in age (median 46.5 vs. 26.5 years, p = 0.009) and the presence of postoperative back pain (75.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.005); however, there was no significant difference in use of selective anticoagulation (p = 0.274).
Conclusion
The results of this study suggest that SAVM embolization can cause acute worsening due to postoperative venous thrombosis with severe back pain, which may be reversed by anticoagulation therapy. Back pain is an important finding that suggests venous thrombosis, and anticoagulation should be urgently administered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Krings T, Mull M, Gilsbach JM, Thron A. Spinal vascular malformations. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:267–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2510-2.
Aminoff MJ, Logue V. The prognosis of patients with spinal vascular malformations. Brain. 1974;97:211–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/97.1.211.
Niimi Y, Matsukawa H, Uchiyama N, Berenstein A. The Preventive Effect of Endovascular Treatment for Recurrent Hemorrhage in Patients with Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1763–8. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4396.
Yu JX, Hong T, Krings T, et al. Natural history of spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: an observational study. Brain. 2019;142:2265–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz153.
Doppman JL, Di Chiro G, Ommaya A. Obliteration of spinal-cord arteriovenous malformation by percutaneous embolisation. Lancet. 1968;1:477. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92812-2
Niimi Y, Uchiyama N, Elijovich L, Berenstein A. Spinal arteriovenous metameric syndrome: clinical manifestations and endovascular management. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:457–63. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3212.
Park JE, Koo HW, Liu H, et al. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations. Clin Neuroradiol. 2018;28:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-016-0541-0.
Berenstein A, Lasjaunias P. Clinical and Endovascular Treatment Aspects in Adults. brugge KG. Surgical Neuroangiography, Vol. 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012.
Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Setton A, Neophytides A. Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: results and follow-up. Neurosurgery. 1997;40:675–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199704000-00004. discussion 82–3.
Knopman J, Zink W, Patsalides A, et al. Secondary clinical deterioration after successful embolization of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: a plea for prophylactic anticoagulation. Interv Neuroradiol. 2010;16:199–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/159101991001600213.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, et al. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen103.
Ma Y, Hong T, Chen S, et al. Steroid Associated Acute Clinical Worsening and Poor Outcome in Patients with Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Prospective Cohort Study. Spine. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003370.
Lasjaunias P, Berenstein A, Brugge KG, et al. Clinical and Interventional Aspects in Children. Surgical Neuroangiography, Vol. 3. Springer; 2006.
Hassler W, Thron A, Grote EH. Hemodynamics of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. An intraoperative study. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:360–70. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1989.70.3.0360.
Jablawi F, Schubert GA, Hans FJ, Mull M. Anticoagulation Therapy After Surgical Treatment of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula. Effectiveness and Long-Term Outcome Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e698–e705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.061.
Patsalides A, Knopman J, Santillan A, et al. Endovascular treatment of spinal arteriovenous lesions: beyond the dural fistula. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:798–808. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2190.
Huffmann BC, Gilsbach JM, Thron A. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a plea for neurosurgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (wien). 1995;135:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02307413.
Ohta T, Gomi M, Oowaki H, Ishikawa M. Chronic venous congestion following embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:186–90. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi/2008/9/8/186.
Kähärä VJ, Seppänen SK, Kuurne T, Laasonen EM. Diagnosis and embolizing of spinal arteriovenous malformations. Ann Med. 1997;29:377–82. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853899708999365.
Rodesch G, Hurth M, Alvarez H, et al. Classification of spinal cord arteriovenous shunts: proposal for a reappraisal—the Bicetre experience with 155 consecutive patients treated between 1981 and. Neurosurgery. 1999;2002(51):374–9. discussion 9–80.
O’Keeffe DT, Mikhail MA, Lanzino G, et al. Corticosteroid-Induced Paraplegia—A Diagnostic Clue for Spinal Dural Arterial Venous Fistula. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:833–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0757.
Oliver TA, Sorensen M, Arthur AS. Endovascular treatment for acute paraplegia after epidural steroid injection in a patient with spinal dural arteriovenous malformation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;17:251–5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.spine11835.
Söderlund ME, Benisty S, Gaston A et al. [Can myelopathies secondary to arterio-venous dural fistulae be aggravated by intravenous corticosteroid therapy?]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2007;163:235–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-3787(07)90395-1
Strowd RE, Geer C, Powers A, Abou-Zeid N. A unique presentation of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula exacerbated by steroids. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:466–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.07.027.
Cabrera M, Paradas C, Márquez C, González A. Acute paraparesis following intravenous steroid therapy in a case of dural spinal arteriovenous fistula. J Neurol. 2008;255:1432–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0943-2.
Lee CS, Pyun HW, Chae EY, et al. Reversible aggravation of neurological deficits after steroid medication in patients with venous congestive myelopathy caused by spinal arteriovenous malformation. Interv Neuroradiol. 2009;15:325–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/159101990901500310.
Canhão P, Cortesão A, Cabral M, et al. Are steroids useful to treat cerebral venous thrombosis? Stroke. 2008;39:105–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.107.484089.
Hurst RW, Kenyon LC, Lavi E et al. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: the pathology of venous hypertensive myelopathy. Neurology. 1995;45:1309–13. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.45.7.1309
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Bikei Ryu: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing- original draft preparation. Tatsuki Mochizuki, Shogo Shima, Shinsuke Sato and Tatsuya Inoue: data curation, investigation, writing- reviewing and editing. Takakazu Kawamata: writing- reviewing and editing, supervision. Yasunari Niimi: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing- reviewing and editing, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
B. Ryu, T. Mochizuki, S. Shima, S. Sato, T. Inoue, T. Kawamata, and Y. Niimi declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee (Saint Luke’s International Hospital, No. 19-R200) and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The need for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Data Availability
All relevant data supporting the results of the present study are included within the article and its Supplementary Information and can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Fig. 1.
Flow chart of the postoperative clinical course.
Supplementary Fig. 2.
Postoperative changes in the modified Aminoff-Logue scale (A–D) Time course of mALS score evaluated preoperatively, perioperatively, and 3 and 6 months after treatment. The comparison between patients with acute postoperative worsening and without worsening revealed a trend toward greater severity of preoperative mALS in the acute worsening group, without statistical significance. (A) Total mALS. (B) mALS-Gait. (C) mALS-Urinary incontinence. (D) mALS‑D (fecal continence/constipation). mALS, modified Aminoff-Logue scale; M, months.
Supplementary Video 1. N‑butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection (25%) from the posterior spinal artery.
Supplementary Video 2. N‑butyl-2-cyanoacrylate injection (37%) from the posterior spinal artery.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ryu, B., Mochizuki, T., Shima, S. et al. Perioperative Management of Spinal Arteriovenous Malformation Embolization: Delayed Venous Thrombosis and Implications for Severe Back Pain. Clin Neuroradiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01403-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01403-5