Skip to main content
Log in

Aneurysm Rupture 5.5 Years after Woven EndoBridge device (WEB) Implantation

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

pa:

Posterior-anterior

CT:

Computed tomography

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

MR:

Magnetic resonance

SAH:

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

WEB:

Woven EndoBridge device

References

  1. Pierot L, Moret J, Barreau X, Szikora I, Herbreteau D, Turjman F, Holtmannspötter M, Januel AC, Costalat V, Fiehler J, Klisch J, Gauvrit JY, Weber W, Desal H, Velasco S, Liebig T, Stockx L, Berkefeld J, Molyneux A, Byrne JV, Spelle L. Aneurysm Treatment With Woven EndoBridge in the Cumulative Population of 3 Prospective, Multicenter Series: 2-Year Follow-Up. Neurosurgery. 2020;87:357–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pierot L, Szikora I, Barreau X, Holtmannspoetter M, Spelle L, Herbreteau D, Fiehler J, Costalat V, Klisch J, Januel AC, Weber W, Liebig T, Stockx L, Berkefeld J, Moret J, Molyneux A, Byrne J. Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016151. Epub ahead of print.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Arthur AS, Molyneux A, Coon AL, Saatci I, Szikora I, Baltacioglu F, Sultan A, Hoit D, Delgado Almandoz JE, Elijovich L, Cekirge S, Byrne JV, Fiorella D; WEB-IT Study investigators. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:924–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goyal N, Hoit D, DiNitto J, Elijovich L, Fiorella D, Pierot L, Lamin S, Spelle L, Saatci I, Cekirge S, Arthur AS. How to WEB: a practical review of methodology for the use of the Woven EndoBridge. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12:512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cognard C, Januel AC. Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015;76:522–30; discussion 530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Rooij S, Sprengers ME, Peluso JP, Daams J, Verbaan D, van Rooij WJ, Majoie CB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Woven EndoBridge single layer for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020;26:455–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kabbasch C, Goertz L, Siebert E, Herzberg M, Borggrefe J, Krischek B, Stavrinou P, Dorn F, Liebig T. WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:812–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosskopf J, Braun M, Dreyhaupt J, Beer M, Schmitz BL, Ozpeynirci Y. Shape Modification is Common in Woven EndoBridge-Treated Intracranial Aneurysms: A Longitudinal Quantitative Analysis Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41:1652–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierot L, Moret J, Barreau X, Szikora I, Herbreteau D, Turjman F, Holtmannspötter M, Januel AC, Costalat V, Fiehler J, Klisch J, Gauvrit JY, Weber W, Desal H, Velasco S, Liebig T, Stockx L, Berkefeld J, Molyneux A, Byrne J, Spelle L. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:553–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cagnazzo F, Ahmed R, Zannoni R, Dargazanli C, Lefevre PH, Gascou G, Derraz I, Riquelme C, Bonafe A, Costalat V. Predicting Factors of Angiographic Aneurysm Occlusion after Treatment with the Woven EndoBridge Device: A Single-Center Experience with Midterm Follow-Up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1773–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Janot K, Herbreteau D, Amelot A, Charbonnier G, Boustia F, Narata AP, Kerleroux B, Bibi R, Papagiannaki C, Rouchaud A, Pierot L. Quantitative evaluation of WEB shape modification: A five-year follow-up study. J Neuroradiol. 2020;47:193–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierot L. Letter: WEB Aneurysm Treatment: Occlusion Stability and “Compression”. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:E666–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clajus C, Strasilla C, Fiebig T, Sychra V, Fiorella D, Klisch J. Initial and mid-term results from 108 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the WEB device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:411–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawson A, Molyneux A, Sellar R, Lamin S, Thomas A, Gholkar A, Patankar T. Safety results from the treatment of 109 cerebral aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge technique: preliminary results in the United Kingdom. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:144–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Caroff J, Mihalea C, Klisch J, Strasilla C, Berlis A, Patankar T, Weber W, Behme D, Jacobsen EA, Liebig T, Prothmann S, Cognard C, Finkenzeller T, Moret J, Spelle L. Single-Layer WEBs: Intrasaccular Flow Disrupters for Aneurysm Treatment—Feasibility Results from a European Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1942–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabbasch C, Mpotsaris A, Reiner M, Liebig T. WEB as part of a multimodality treatment in complex, large, and partially thrombosed intracranial aneurysms: a single-center observational study of technical success, safety, and recurrence. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:1235–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kabbasch C, Goertz L, Siebert E, Herzberg M, Hamisch C, Mpotsaris A, Dorn F, Liebig T. Treatment strategies for recurrent and residual aneurysms after Woven Endobridge implantation. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:390–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierot L, Bannery C, Batchinsky-Parrou V, Kleiber JC, Soize S, Litre CF. Clipping of recanalized intracerebral aneurysms initially treated by the Woven EndoBridge device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11:807–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chapot R, Mosimann PJ, Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Retreatments must be included in the evaluation of device performance. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016619. Epub ahead of print.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elmar Spuentrup.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Kabbasch: proctor for MicroVention, consultant for Acandis. E. Spüntrup, C. Spüntrup, F. Bytyqi and J. Walter declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spuentrup, E., Spüntrup, C., Bytyqi, F. et al. Aneurysm Rupture 5.5 Years after Woven EndoBridge device (WEB) Implantation. Clin Neuroradiol 31, 875–880 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01004-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-021-01004-6

Navigation