Abstract
Introduction
Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is an important etiology of ischemic stroke and early recognition is vital to protect patients from the major complication of cerebral embolization by administration of anticoagulants. The etiology of arterial dissections differ and can be either spontaneous or traumatic. Even though the historical gold standard is still catheter angiography, recent studies suggest a good performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of CAD. We conducted this research to evaluate the variety and frequency of possible imaging signs of spontaneous and traumatic CAD and to guide neuroradiologists’ decision making.
Methods
Retrospective review of the database of our multiple injured patients admitted to the Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery of the University Hospital Münster in Germany (a level 1 trauma center) for patients with traumatic CAD (tCAD) and of our stroke database (2008–2015) for patients with spontaneous CAD (sCAD) and CT/CTA on initial clinical work-up. All images were evaluated concerning specific and sensitive radiological features for dissection by two experienced neuroradiologists. Imaging features were compared between the two etiologies.
Results
This study included 145 patients (99 male, 46 female; 45 ± 18.8 years of age), consisting of 126 dissected arteries with a traumatic and 43 with spontaneous etiology. Intimal flaps were more frequently observed after traumatic etiology (58.1% tCADs, 6.9% sCADs; p < 0.001); additionally, multivessel dissections were much more frequent in trauma patients (3 sCADs, 21 tCADs) and only less than half (42%) of the patients with traumatic dissections showed cervical spine fractures.
Conclusion
Neuroradiologists should be aware that intimal flaps and multivessel dissections are more common after a traumatic etiology. In addition, it seems important to conduct a CTA in a trauma setting, even if no cervical spine fracture is detected.


References
Fusco MR, Harrigan MR. Cerebrovascular dissections: a review. Part II: blunt cerebrovascular injury. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:517–30. discussion 530.
Davis JW, Holbrook TL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC, Field TO Jr, Shackford SR. Blunt carotid artery dissection: incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment. J Trauma. 1990;30:1514–7.
Debette S, Goeggel Simonetti B, Schilling S, Martin JJ, Kloss M, Sarikaya H et al. Familial occurrence and heritable connective tissue disorders in cervical artery dissection. Neurology. 2014;83:2023–31.
Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:898–906.
Nassenstein I, Krämer SC, Niederstadt T, Stehling C, Dittrich R, Kuhlenbäumer G, et al. Incidence of cerebral ischemia in patients with suspected cervical artery dissection: first results of a prospective study. Rofo. 2005;177:1532–9.
Löhrer L, Vieth V, Nassenstein I, Hartensuer R, Niederstadt T, Raschke MJ, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in acute trauma care: a screening protocol. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:837–43.
Völker W, Dittrich R, Grewe S, Nassenstein I, Csiba L, Herczeg L, Borsay BA, Robenek H, Kuhlenbäumer G, Ringelstein EB. The outer arterial wall layers are primarily affected in spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Neurology. 2011;76:1463–71.
Caplan LR. Dissections of brain-supplying arteries. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:34–42.
Bachmann R, Nassenstein I, Kooijman H, Dittrich R, Kugel H, Niederstadt T, et al. Spontaneous acute dissection of the internal carotid artery: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla with a dedicated surface coil. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:105–11.
Bachmann R, Nassenstein I, Kooijman H, Dittrich R, Stehling C, Kugel H, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla in the short-term follow-up of patients with proven cervical artery dissection. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:460–6.
Hanning U, Sporns PB, Schmiedel M, Ringelstein EB, Heindel W, Wiendl H, Niederstadt T, Dittrich R. CT versus MR techniques in the detection of cervical artery dissection. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27:607–12.
Fleischmann D. Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(Suppl 2):S11–5.
Salomon EJ, Barfett J, Willems PW, Geibprasert S, Bacigaluppi S, Krings T. Dynamic CT angiography and CT perfusion employing a 320-detector row CT: protocol and current clinical applications. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19:187–96.
Nedeltchev K, Baumgartner RW. Traumatic cervical artery dissection. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2005;20:54–63.
Delgado Almandoz JE, Schaefer PW, Kelly HR, Lev MH, Gonzalez RG, Romero JM. Multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of acute blunt head and neck trauma: a proposed acute craniocervical trauma scoring system. Radiology. 2010;254:236–44.
Elijovich L, Kazmi K, Gauvrit JY, Law M. The emerging role of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of cervical arterial dissection: preliminary study. Neuroradiology. 2006;48:606–12.
Vertinsky AT, Schwartz NE, Fischbein NJ, Rosenberg J, Albers GW, Zaharchuk G. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1753–60.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
P. Sporns, T. Niederstadt, W. Heindel, M. J. Raschke, R. Hartensuer, R. Dittrich, U. Hanning declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Münster and the Westfalian Chamber of Physicians, Münster, Germany. All study protocols and procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Additional information
Both senior authors (R. Dittrich and U. Hanning) contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sporns, P.B., Niederstadt, T., Heindel, W. et al. Imaging of Spontaneous and Traumatic Cervical Artery Dissection. Clin Neuroradiol 29, 269–275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-018-0666-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-018-0666-4