Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging of Spontaneous and Traumatic Cervical Artery Dissection

Comparison of Typical CT Angiographic Features

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is an important etiology of ischemic stroke and early recognition is vital to protect patients from the major complication of cerebral embolization by administration of anticoagulants. The etiology of arterial dissections differ and can be either spontaneous or traumatic. Even though the historical gold standard is still catheter angiography, recent studies suggest a good performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of CAD. We conducted this research to evaluate the variety and frequency of possible imaging signs of spontaneous and traumatic CAD and to guide neuroradiologists’ decision making.

Methods

Retrospective review of the database of our multiple injured patients admitted to the Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery of the University Hospital Münster in Germany (a level 1 trauma center) for patients with traumatic CAD (tCAD) and of our stroke database (2008–2015) for patients with spontaneous CAD (sCAD) and CT/CTA on initial clinical work-up. All images were evaluated concerning specific and sensitive radiological features for dissection by two experienced neuroradiologists. Imaging features were compared between the two etiologies.

Results

This study included 145 patients (99 male, 46 female; 45 ± 18.8 years of age), consisting of 126 dissected arteries with a traumatic and 43 with spontaneous etiology. Intimal flaps were more frequently observed after traumatic etiology (58.1% tCADs, 6.9% sCADs; p < 0.001); additionally, multivessel dissections were much more frequent in trauma patients (3 sCADs, 21 tCADs) and only less than half (42%) of the patients with traumatic dissections showed cervical spine fractures.

Conclusion

Neuroradiologists should be aware that intimal flaps and multivessel dissections are more common after a traumatic etiology. In addition, it seems important to conduct a CTA in a trauma setting, even if no cervical spine fracture is detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Fusco MR, Harrigan MR. Cerebrovascular dissections: a review. Part II: blunt cerebrovascular injury. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:517–30. discussion 530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis JW, Holbrook TL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC, Field TO Jr, Shackford SR. Blunt carotid artery dissection: incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment. J Trauma. 1990;30:1514–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Debette S, Goeggel Simonetti B, Schilling S, Martin JJ, Kloss M, Sarikaya H et al. Familial occurrence and heritable connective tissue disorders in cervical artery dissection. Neurology. 2014;83:2023–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Schievink WI. Spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:898–906.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nassenstein I, Krämer SC, Niederstadt T, Stehling C, Dittrich R, Kuhlenbäumer G, et al. Incidence of cerebral ischemia in patients with suspected cervical artery dissection: first results of a prospective study. Rofo. 2005;177:1532–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Löhrer L, Vieth V, Nassenstein I, Hartensuer R, Niederstadt T, Raschke MJ, et al. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in acute trauma care: a screening protocol. Eur Spine J. 2012;21:837–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Völker W, Dittrich R, Grewe S, Nassenstein I, Csiba L, Herczeg L, Borsay BA, Robenek H, Kuhlenbäumer G, Ringelstein EB. The outer arterial wall layers are primarily affected in spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Neurology. 2011;76:1463–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caplan LR. Dissections of brain-supplying arteries. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4:34–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bachmann R, Nassenstein I, Kooijman H, Dittrich R, Kugel H, Niederstadt T, et al. Spontaneous acute dissection of the internal carotid artery: high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla with a dedicated surface coil. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachmann R, Nassenstein I, Kooijman H, Dittrich R, Stehling C, Kugel H, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla in the short-term follow-up of patients with proven cervical artery dissection. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:460–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanning U, Sporns PB, Schmiedel M, Ringelstein EB, Heindel W, Wiendl H, Niederstadt T, Dittrich R. CT versus MR techniques in the detection of cervical artery dissection. J Neuroimaging. 2017;27:607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleischmann D. Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(Suppl 2):S11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Salomon EJ, Barfett J, Willems PW, Geibprasert S, Bacigaluppi S, Krings T. Dynamic CT angiography and CT perfusion employing a 320-detector row CT: protocol and current clinical applications. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nedeltchev K, Baumgartner RW. Traumatic cervical artery dissection. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2005;20:54–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado Almandoz JE, Schaefer PW, Kelly HR, Lev MH, Gonzalez RG, Romero JM. Multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of acute blunt head and neck trauma: a proposed acute craniocervical trauma scoring system. Radiology. 2010;254:236–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elijovich L, Kazmi K, Gauvrit JY, Law M. The emerging role of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of cervical arterial dissection: preliminary study. Neuroradiology. 2006;48:606–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vertinsky AT, Schwartz NE, Fischbein NJ, Rosenberg J, Albers GW, Zaharchuk G. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1753–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter B. Sporns.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

P. Sporns, T. Niederstadt, W. Heindel, M. J. Raschke, R. Hartensuer, R. Dittrich, U. Hanning declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Münster and the Westfalian Chamber of Physicians, Münster, Germany. All study protocols and procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Both senior authors (R. Dittrich and U. Hanning) contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sporns, P.B., Niederstadt, T., Heindel, W. et al. Imaging of Spontaneous and Traumatic Cervical Artery Dissection. Clin Neuroradiol 29, 269–275 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-018-0666-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-018-0666-4

Keywords

Navigation