Skip to main content
Log in

Herzklappenerkrankungen

Wie aufgeklärt ist die deutsche Bevölkerung?

Heart valve disesases

How sufficient is the knowledge of the German population?

  • Originalien
  • Published:
Herz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Um das Bewusstsein der Bevölkerung hinsichtlich verschiedener Erkrankungen zu evaluieren, wurden insgesamt 1446 Personen ab einem Alter von 60 Jahren aus 14 verschiedenen deutschen Städten befragt. Besonderer Fokus lag auf Herzklappenerkrankungen und im Speziellen auf der Aortenklappenstenose (AS). Während die meisten Befragten (25,2 %) v. a. Angst vor einem Krebsleiden schilderten, äußerten nur 3,3 % Bedenken hinsichtlich Herzklappenerkrankungen. Zu diesen sind die Kenntnisse weitgehend limitiert: Nur 7,4 % der Teilnehmer gaben an, allgemein über Herzklappenerkrankungen informiert zu sein, 12,5 % konnten das Krankheitsbild der AS korrekt beschreiben. Immerhin 35,0 % der Teilnehmer benannten die Anzahl der menschlichen Herzklappen korrekt. 71,6 % der Befragten war zumindest eine Therapieoption der AS bekannt, und 30,6 % waren mit der perkutanen Aortenklappenimplantation (TAVI) vertraut. Nachdem die Befragten eine kurze Aufklärung über die Prävalenz, die Symptome und den Verlauf der AS erhalten hatten, stieg die Besorgnis hinsichtlich der AS bei 45,6 %. 15,7 % der Teilnehmer wünschten sich hiernach, mehr über das Krankheitsbild der AS zu erfahren, 4,7 % erkannten die typischen Krankheitssymptome bei sich selbst. Für nähere Informationen würden hierbei die meisten der Teilnehmer das Gespräch mit einem Facharzt (77,2 %) bzw. mit ihrem Hausarzt (43,2 %) oder das Internet (29,7 %) präferieren. Trotz der hohen Prävalenz sowie der hohen Morbiditäts- und Mortalitätsrate ist die deutsche Bevölkerung offensichtlich nicht ausreichend über die AS sowie deren Behandlungsmöglichkeiten aufgeklärt. Aufklärungskampagnen zur Förderung des Bewusstseins für die AS sollten initiiert werden, um eine frühzeitige Diagnostik und somit eine rechtzeitige Therapie zu ermöglichen.

Abstract

To evaluate the awareness and knowledge of the German population regarding diseases in general, a survey of 1446 people aged 60 years or older was conducted in 14 German towns. The focus was on heart valve diseases with special emphasis on aortic valve stenosis (AS). While cancer was the disease that respondents were most concerned about (25.2%), only 3.3% were concerned about heart valve diseases. In this respect, the knowledge was broadly limited: only 7.4% of participants claimed to have some familiarity with heart valve diseases and only 12.5% could correctly describe the symptoms of AS. Even so, 35.0% of the participants could correctly name the number of human heart valves, 71.6% knew at least one therapy option for AS and 30.6% were familiar with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). After providing a brief clarification of the prevalence, symptoms and course of AS, 45.6% of respondents were more concerned about the condition, 15.7% wanted to know more about the symptoms of AS and 4.7% even recognized the typical symptoms in themselves. Most of the participants would like to seek more information preferably in discussion with a specialist physician (77.2%), with their general practitioner (43.2%) or using the internet (29.7%). Despite its high prevalence, high morbidity and mortality, the vast majority of the German population were neither concerned nor fully aware of treatment options for AS. There is a strong case for public awareness campaigns that provide better knowledge of AS, and support check-ups that enable timely treatment and the avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization and death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368:1005–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry C, Lloyd SM, Wang Y, MacDonald A, Ford I (2013) The changing course of aortic valve disease in Scotland: temporal trends in hospitalizations and mortality and prognostic importance of aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 34(21):1538–1547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G et al (2005) Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J 26(24):2714–2720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly T, Rotbarth R, Cooper C, Kaiser D, Smucker M, Gibson R (1988) Comparison of outcome of asymptomatic to symptomatic patients older than 20 years of age with valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 61(4):123–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coglianese EE, Davidoff R (2009) Predicting outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation 120(1):9–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leon M, Smith C, Mack M, Miller D, Moses J, Svensson L, Tuzcu M, Webb J, Fontana G, Makkar R, Brown D, Block P, Guyton R, Pichard A, Bavaria J, Herrmann H, Douglas P, Peterson J, Akin J, Anderson W, Wang D, Pcocock S, PARTNER Trial Investigators (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363(17):1597–1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith C, Leon M, Mack M, Miller D, Moses J, Svnesson L, Tuzcu E, Webb J, Fontana G, Makkar R, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani V, Corso P, Pichard A, Bavaria J, Herrmann H, Akin J, Anderson W, Wang D, Pocock SJ, PARTNER Trial Investigators. (2011) Transcatheter versus surgical aotic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364(23):2187–2198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaede L, Di Bartolomeo R, Van Der Kley F, Elsässer A, Iung B, Möllmann H (2016) Aortic valve stenosis: what do people know ? A heart valve disease awareness survey of over 8,800 people aged 60 or over. EuroIntervention 12(12):883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaatsch P, Spix C, Hentschel S (2013) Krebs in Deutschland 2009/2010. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, S 60–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weyerer S (2005) Altersdemenz. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin, S 7–25

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ross J, Braunwald E (1968) Aortic stenosis. Circulation 38(1S5):V-61–V-67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Altin SV, Stock S (2015) Impact of health literacy, accessibility and coordination of care on patient’s satisfaction with primary care in Germany. BMC Fam Pract 16:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0372-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Pellikka PA, Sarano M, Nishimura R et al (2005) Outcome of 622 adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis during prolonged follow-up. Circulation 111(24):3290–3295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Monin JL, Lancellotti P, Monchi M et al (2009) Risk score for predicting outcome in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation 120:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G et al (2001) Predictors of outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 344(3):227 (author reply 228–229)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ et al (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: the task force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European society of cardiology (ESC) and the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J:1–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Eggebrecht H, Mehta RH (2016) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) in Germany 2008–2014 : on its way to standard therapy for aortic valve stenosis in the elderly? EuroIntervention 11:1029–1033. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJY15M09_11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaede L, Blumenstein J, Kim W‑K et al (2017) Trends in aortic valve replacement in Germany in 2015: transcatheter versus isolated surgical aortic valve repair. Clin Res Cardiol 106(6):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaede L, Kim W‑K, Blumenstein J et al (2017) Temporal trends in transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement. Herz 42(3):316–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Möllmann H, Bestehorn K, Bestehorn M et al (2016) In-hospital outcome of transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve stenosis – complete dataset of patients treated in 2013 in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 105:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaede L, Möllmann H (2015) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): current perspectives. Herz 54(5):742–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walther T, Hamm CW, Schuler G et al (2015) Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). J Am Coll Cardiol 65:2173–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Popma JJ, Adams DH, Reardon MJ et al (2014) Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(19):1972–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapadia SR, Leon MB, Makkar RR et al (2015) 5‑year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385:2485–2491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60290-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Smith CR et al (2015) 5‑year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385:2477–2484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ et al (2016) Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 374(17):1609–1620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Förderung

Der Heart Valve Disease Awareness Survey wurde durch Opinion Matters durchgeführt und durch Edwards Lifesciences finanziert.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Möllmann.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

L. Gaede, J. Blumenstein, C. Liebetrau, O. Dörr, W.-K. Kim, C Hamm, A. Elsässer, H. Nef und H. Möllmann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaede, L., Blumenstein, J., Liebetrau, C. et al. Herzklappenerkrankungen. Herz 44, 161–169 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4632-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-017-4632-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation