Skip to main content
Log in

Global scholarly output on orthodontic temporary anchorage devices (TADs): A silver jublee scientometric analysis

Weltweiter wissenschaftlicher Output zu temporären kieferorthopädischen Verankerungen (TADs): Eine szientometrische Analyse zum Silberjubiläum

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to analyze the global scholarly production of articles related to temporary anchorage devices (TADs) from 1998–2023 in peer-reviewed dental journals indexed in the Web of Science.

Materials and methods

A database of TADs-related articles was created via a Web of Sciences structured search. The bibliometric characteristics of the studies, including the number of citations, publication year, journal title, journal impact factor (IF), authorship, contributing institutions and countries, thematic field, and study design, were extracted. Keyword co-occurrence network analyses and the correlation between the number of citations and the article age, journal IF, and journal quartile of each article were performed.

Results

The top 50 cited articles were published from 1999–2016, and the total number of citations ranged from 82–602, with 160.36 citations/paper on average. Most of the articles originated from Japan (n = 12), with the most remarkable contributions from Nihon and Okayama Universities, Japan (n = 5, each). The American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics had the most cited articles, with 196.57 citations/paper on average. A significant positive correlation occurred between the number of citations and publication age (rho = 0.392, P = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our scientometric analysis reported the characteristics of TADs-related articles published over 25 years. Most highly-cited articles were published between 2005 and 2008. The positive correlation between articles’ publication date and the number of citations might impact the top 50 within the next 5–10 years.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung

Ziel dieser Studie war es, den weltweiten wissenschaftlichen Output von Artikeln über temporäre Verankerungen („temporary anchorage devices“, TAD) im Zeitraum von 1998-2023 in im Web of Science indexierten zahnmedizinischen Fachzeitschriften mit Peer-Review zu analysieren.

Materialien und Methoden

Über eine strukturierte Suche im Web of Science wurde eine Datenbank mit TAD-relevanten Artikeln erstellt. Die bibliometrischen Merkmale der Studien, einschließlich der Anzahl der Zitate, des Publikationsjahres, des Zeitschriftentitels, des Impact Factors (IF), der Autorenschaft, der beitragenden Institutionen und Länder, des Themenbereichs und des Studiendesigns, wurden extrahiert. Es wurden Netzwerkanalysen zum Vorkommen von Schlüsselwörtern und die Korrelation zwischen der Anzahl der Zitate und dem Alter des Artikels, dem Zeitschriften-Impact-Faktor und dem Quartil der Zeitschrift für jeden Artikel durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse

50 angeführte Artikel wurden im Zeitraum 1999-2016 veröffentlicht, und die Gesamtzahl der Zitate reichte von 82-602, mit durchschnittlich 160,36 Zitaten pro Artikel. Die meisten Artikel stammten aus Japan (n = 12), die bemerkenswertesten Beiträge von den Universitäten Nihon und Okayama, Japan (jeweils n = 5). Die am häufigsten zitierten Artikel fanden sich mit durchschnittlich 196,57 Zitaten pro Artikel im American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Es bestand eine signifikante positive Korrelation zwischen der Anzahl der Zitate und dem Alter der Veröffentlichung (rho = 0,392, p = 0,005).

Schlussfolgerung

Unsere szientometrische Analyse gibt Aufschluss über die Merkmale der in den letzten 25 Jahren veröffentlichten TAD-bezogenen Artikel. Die meisten häufig zitierten Artikel wurden zwischen 2005 und 2008 veröffentlicht. Die positive Korrelation zwischen Veröffentlichungsdatum und Anzahl der Zitierungen könnte sich in den nächsten 5–10 Jahren auf die „Top 50“ auswirken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 Abb. 1
Fig. 2 Abb. 2
Fig. 3 Abb. 3
Fig. 4 Abb. 4
Fig. 5 Abb. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of supporting data

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Kyung HM, Ly NTK, Hong M (2017) Orthodontic skeletal anchorage: Up-to-date review. Orthod Waves 76:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanomi R (1997) Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 31:763–767

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B (1998) Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13:201–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaramillo-Bedoya D, Villegas-Giraldo G, Agudelo-Suárez AA, Ramírez-Ossa DM (2022) A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics. Dent J 10:

  5. Casaña-Ruiz MD, Bellot-Arcís C, Paredes-Gallardo V, García-Sanz V, Almerich-Silla JM, Montiel-Company JM (2020) Risk factors for orthodontic mini-implants in skeletal anchorage biological stability: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 10:5848

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Barthélemi S, Desoutter A, Souaré F, Cuisinier F (2019) Effectiveness of anchorage with temporary anchorage devices during anterior maxillary tooth retraction: A randomized clinical trial. Korean J Orthod 49:279–285

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D (2018) Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 40:519–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramírez-Ossa DM, Escobar-Correa N, Ramírez-Bustamante MA, Agudelo-Suárez AA (2020) An umbrella review of the effectiveness of temporary anchorage devices and the factors that contribute to their success or failure. J Evid Based Dent Pract 20:101402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cousley RRJ, Sandler PJ (2015) Advances in orthodontic anchorage with the use of mini-implant techniques. Br Dent J 218:E4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DiBiase A (2015) Summary of: advances in orthodontic anchorage with the use of mini-implant techniques. Br Dent J 218:178–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira CB, Ayub P, Angelieri F, Murata WH, Suzuki SS, Ravelli DB (2021) et al Evaluation of factors related to the success of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion. Angle Orthod 91:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarul M, Lis J, Park H‑S, Rumin K (2022) Evidence-based selection of orthodontic miniscrews, increasing their success rate in the mandibular buccal shelf. A randomized, prospective clinical trial. Bmc Oral Health 22:414

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee Y, Choi S‑H, Yu H‑S, Erenebat T, Liu J, Cha J‑Y (2021) Stability and success rate of dual-thread miniscrews. Angle Orthod 91:509–514

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell AG, Hughes DL, Wheat JR, Lewis WG (2016) The 100 most influential manuscripts in gastric cancer: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg 28:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahzad M, Chaudhary SG, Anwar I, Arslan M, Naseem Z, Fatima NT (2022) et al Top 100 cited articles on clinical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A bibliometric analysis. Front Med (lausanne) 9:872692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabri H, Peri-implantitis WH‑L (2023) A bibliometric network analysis of top 100 most-cited research articles. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res

  17. Gast KM, Kuzon WM, Waljee JF (2014) Bibliometric indices and academic promotion within plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:838e:44e

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holden G, Rosenberg G, Bibliometrics BK (2005) a potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions. Soc Work Health Care 41:67–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Woolf SH (1992) Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med 152:946–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fernandes EC, Júnior NMB, Paiva Tôrres ACS, de Nóbrega FJO (2022) Santos PB. The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontic journals in the last 20 years. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 161:e260–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tarazona B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A (2018) The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: A bibliometric study. Angle Orthod 88:785–796

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Leo M, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G, Condò SG, Condò R (2016) Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants. Clin Ter 167:e70–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrillo M, Nucci L, Gallo V, Bruni A, Montrella R, Fortunato L (2022) et al Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a bibliometric analysis of the 50 most-cited articles from 2012 to. Angle Orthod 2023:

  24. Alarcón MA, Esparza D, Montoya C, Monje A, Faggion CM (2017) The 300 Most-Cited Articles in Implant Dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 32:e1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Asiri FY, Kruger E, Tennant M (2021) The top 100 most cited articles published in dentistry: 2020 update. Healthc (basel) 9:

  26. Adnan S, Ullah R (2018) Top-cited Articles in Regenerative Endodontics: A Bibliometric Analysis. J Endod 44:1650–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N (2011) Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod 37:1183–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Martelli AJ, Machado RA, Martelli DRB, Neves LT das, Martelli Junior H. The 100 most-cited papers in oral medicine and pathology. Braz Oral Res. 2020;35:e020.

  29. Ahmad P, Dummer PMH, Noorani TY, Asif JA (2019) The top 50 most-cited articles published in the International Endodontic. Journal Int Endod J 52:803–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Varghese VS, Atwal PK, Dua KK, Kurian N, Cherian JM, Sabu AM (2021) A bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published in the Journal of Conservative Dentistry. J Conserv Dent 24:341–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brito J, Nassis GP, Seabra AT, Figueiredo P (2018) Top 50 most-cited articles in medicine and science in football. Bmj Open Sport Exerc Med 4:e388

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hui J, Han Z, Geng G, Yan W, Shao P (2013) The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011. Angle Orthod 83:491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from the public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agencies. MGH is supported by the Rita Levi-Montalcini Postdoctoral Fellowship award from WUSTL Center of Regenerative Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.G. Hassan: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing—original draft, review & editing. H.H. Abdelrahman: Consultation, Data Analysis, Biostatistical Analysis, Validation, Writing—original draft, review & editing. A.A. A. Emam: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing—original draft, review & editing. A.R. Zaher: Supervision, Validation, Writing—original draft, review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed G. Hassan Ph.D. M.Sc. B.D.S..

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

M.G. Hassan, H.H. Abdelrahman, A.A. A. Emam and A.R. Zaher declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

No institutional review board approval was needed for this study since it was a retrospective bibliometric search and scientometric analysis of publicly available data. The data collection and analysis were planned according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The authors Mohamed G. Hassan and Hams H. Abdelrahman contributed equally to the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, M.G., Abdelrahman, H.H., Emam, A.A.A. et al. Global scholarly output on orthodontic temporary anchorage devices (TADs): A silver jublee scientometric analysis. J Orofac Orthop (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00530-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00530-5

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation