Skip to main content
Log in

Orthodontists’ knowledge and experience on referring orthognathic surgery patients to psychological support

Wissen und Erfahrung von Kieferorthopäden bei der Vermittlung von kieferorthopädisch-chirurgischen Patienten an eine psychologische Mitbetreuung

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 07 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate orthodontists’ knowledge and experience on referring orthognathic surgery patients to psychological support.

Methods

A 15-question questionnaire was sent to orthodontists who were members of the Turkish Orthodontic Society via e‑mail. The participants were informed about the purpose of the study and were provided a link to access the questionnaire via the internet. In order to increase the feedback rate, two reminders were sent to all addresses. Members who did not perform orthognathic surgery were not included in the study.

Results

Of the 1615 members who were sent the link, 233 responded and filled out the electronic questionnaire, while 12 participants who stated that they did not treat orthognathic patients were excluded. Most of the participants stated that they did not refer their patients to psychological support. The main reasons for not recommending psychological support to patients was fear about the reaction of the patients and that patients might refuse to visit the psychologist/psychiatrist. The most common reasons for referring patients to psychological support were the following: patient had past/current psychological problem, unrealistic expectations, recent concerns regarding orthognathic surgery and see no significant need for surgery. In all, 98% of participants stated that they did not use psychological questionnaire forms for their patients. The vast majority of participants stated that they were not trained in psychological assessment/treatment, and a large majority of participants thought that it would be beneficial to receive training in this field.

Conclusion

Most orthodontists do not receive adequate training in psychology and do not refer orthognathic surgery patients to psychological support. It would be beneficial to offer clinicians training in this field.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung

Ziel dieser Studie war es, das Wissen und die Erfahrung von Kieferorthopäden bezüglich der Vermittlung von psychologischer Unterstützung für kieferorthopädisch-chirurgische Patienten zu evaluieren.

Methoden

Ein Fragebogen mit 15 Fragen wurde an Kieferorthopäden, die Mitglieder der türkischen kieferorthopädischen Gesellschaft waren, per Email verschickt. Die Teilnehmenden wurden über den Zweck der Studie informiert und erhielten einen Link, um den Fragebogen online abzurufen. Um die Rücklaufquote zu erhöhen, wurden an alle Adressen jeweils 2 Erinnerungsschreiben verschickt. Mitglieder, die keine Patienten für orthognathe Chirurgie betreuten, wurden nicht in die Studie aufgenommen.

Ergebnisse

Von den 1615 Mitgliedern, denen der Link zugesandt worden war, antworteten 233 und füllten den elektronischen Fragebogen aus, während 12 Teilnehmende, die angaben, keine Orthognathiepatienten zu behandeln, ausgeschlossen wurden. Die meisten Teilnehmer gaben an, dass sie ihre Patienten nicht an psychologische Unterstützung verweisen. Die Hauptgründe dafür, den Patienten keine psychologische Unterstützung zu empfehlen, waren die Sorge vor der Reaktion der Patienten und davor, dass die Patienten eine Vorstellung beim Psychologen/Psychiater ablehnen könnten. Die häufigsten Gründe, Patienten an psychologische Unterstützung zu verweisen, waren: Der Patient hatte ein zurückliegendes/aktuelles psychologisches Problem, unrealistische Erwartungen, aktuelle Bedenken bezüglich kieferorthopädischer Chirurgie und sah keinen signifikanten Bedarf für eine operative Intervention. Von den Teilnehmenden gaben 98% an, dass sie keine psychologischen Fragebögen für ihre Patienten verwenden. Die überwiegende Mehrheit der Befragten gab an, dass sie nicht in der psychologischen Beurteilung/Behandlung geschult seien, und eine große Mehrheit der Befragten war der Meinung, dass Fortbildungen in diesem Bereich hilfreich seien.

Schlussfolgerung

Die meisten Kieferorthopäden erhalten keine adäquate Ausbildung in Psychologie und verweisen kieferorthopädisch-chirurgische Patienten nicht an eine entsprechende Mitbetreuung. Hilfreich wären hier Fortbildungsangebote für klinisch Tätige.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 Abb. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Sclafani AP, Choe KS (2008) Psychological aspects of plastic surgery. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/838030-overview. Accessed 1 Oct 2009

  2. Crilly Bellucci CCC, Kapp-Simon KA (2007) Psychological considerations in orthognathic surgery. Clin Plast Surg 34(3):11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crerand CE, Franklin ME, Sarwer DB (2006) Body dysmorphic disorder and cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rankin M, Mayers PM (2008) Core curriculum for plastic surgical nursing: psychosocial care of the plastic surgical patient. Plast Surg Nurs 28:1226

    Google Scholar 

  5. Swami V, Chamorro-Premuzic T, Bridges S, Furnham A (2009) Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: personality and individual difference predictors. Body Image 6:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sykes JM (2009) Managing the psychological aspects of plastic surgery patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borah G, Rankin M, Wey P (1999) Psychological complications in 281 plastic surgery practices. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1241–1246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Juggins KJ et al (2006) Psychological support for orthognathic patients—what do orthodontists want? J Orthod 33:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patcas R, Cunningham SJ, Shute J, Lloyd T, Obwegeser JA, Arjomand L, Sharma S (2017) Motivation for orthognathic treatment and anticipated satisfaction levels—a two-centre cross-national audit. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 45(6):1004–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alaşalvar F, Kocadereli İ (2015) Ortodontide hasta-hekim ilişkisi ve hasta psikolojisi. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 10:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alanko OM, Svedström-Oristo AL, Peltomäki T, Kauko T, Tuomisto MT (2014) Psychosocial well-being of prospective orthognathic-surgical patients. Acta Odontol Scand 72(8):887–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips C, Bennett ME, Broder HL (1998) Dentofacial disharmony: psychological status of patients seeking treatment consultation. Angle Orthod 68:547–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alanko OM, Svedström-Oristo AL, Tuomisto MT (2010) Patients’ perceptions of orthognathic treatment, well-being, and psychological or psychiatric status: a systematic review. Acta Odontolscand 68(5):249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vargel S, Uluşahin A (2001) Psychopathology and body image in cosmetic surgery patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 25:474–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung MH (2016) Quality of life and self-esteem of female orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74(6):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Agırnaslıgıl MO et al (2019) The changes of self-esteem, sensitivity to criticism, and social appearance anxiety in orthognathic surgery patients: a controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 155(4):482–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu D et al (2013) Presurgical motivations, self-esteem, and oral health of orthognathic surgery patients. J Craniofac Surg 24(3):743–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatice Kübra Olkun DDS.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

H.K. Olkun declares that she has no competing interests.

Ethical standards

The study was approved by the Istanbul Okan University Noninterventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from the patients in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The following statement from the conclusions section in the original manuscript: “Both clinicians and patients stated that it would be beneficial to obtain training in this field.” should be: “It would be beneficial to offer clinicians training in this field.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olkun, H.K. Orthodontists’ knowledge and experience on referring orthognathic surgery patients to psychological support. J Orofac Orthop 82, 338–343 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00289-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00289-z

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation