Skip to main content
Log in

The German version of the child perceptions questionnaire on oral health-related quality of life (CPQ-G11–14)

Population-based norm values

Normwerte mundgesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität für die deutsche Version des Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11–14)

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) impairment and to establish norm values for the German version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11–14, 35 questions) in the general population aged 11 to 14 years.

Subjects and methods

Data were collected in a national survey (n=1,597, mean age: 12.5 ± 1.2 years, 49.3% female) and subjects sampled using a multistage technique. OHRQoL was measured with the CPQ-G11–14, which was presented in a personal interview. Norm values were computed for the CPQ-G11–14 summary score (simple sum of all item responses). The CPQ-G11–14 summary score distribution was described by empirical cumulative distribution functions. Because orthodontic treatment was closely associated with CPQ-G11–14 summary scores, percentile-based norms were stratified by this variable.

Results

The CPQ-G11–14 mean was 12.6 ± 15.9 units. There was no influence of age (p>0.05) or gender (p>0.05) on the CPQ-G summary scores, but the summary scores varied according to orthodontic treatment status (p<0.001). Among the general population sample, CPQ-G11–14 scores of the 50% less-impaired subjects were ≤7. The same percentage of subjects undergoing orthodontic treatment had scores of ≤13 and those without orthodontic treatment had scores of ≤5. We observed scores of ≤32 points in 90% of the population. That figure was ≤50 points for subjects undergoing orthodontic treatment and ≤21 points for those without orthodontic treatment. The most frequent problems the children and adolescents reported (CPQ-G answers “often” and “very often”) were “breathing through the mouth” (13.0%), “mouth sores” (4.4%) and “bad breath” (4.3%).

Conclusion

The norm values we present provide a frame of reference for future cross-sectional studies in the general population and in patient populations with specific oral conditions when measuring OHRQoL by CPQ-G11–14 in children and adolescents aged 11 to 14 years old.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, die mundgesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität (MLQ) von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Alter von 11 bis 14 Jahren in Deutschland zu charakterisieren und Normwerte für die deutsche Version des Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11–14, 35 Fragen) dieser Altersgruppe zu erstellen.

Probanden und Methodik

Bevölkerungsrepräsentative Daten wurden in einem nationalen Survey an 1597 Probanden im Alter von 11 bis 14 Jahren erhoben (mittleres Alter 12,5 ± 1,2 Jahre, 49,3% weiblich). Die Probanden wurden in einem persönlichen Interview zu ihrer MLQ, gemessen mittels des CPQ-G11–14, befragt. Normwerte für den Fragebogen wurden als Prozentränge der Häufigkeitsverteilung des CPQ-Summenwertes, unterteilt in drei Kategorien berechnet: Allgemeinbevölkerung, mit bzw. ohne kieferorthopädische Behandlung.

Ergebnisse

Der CPQ-G11–14-Mittelwert lag bei 12,6 ± 15,9 Einheiten auf der von 0 bis 140 reichenden Skala, wobei ein kleiner CPQ-Summenwert für eine subjektiv positiv erlebte MLQ mit wenigen Einschränkungen steht, ein hoher Wert für eine stark beeinträchtigte Lebensqualität im Mundbereich. Alter und Geschlecht hatten keinen Einfluss auf den CPQ-G- Summenwert (p >0,05; t-Test), die Variable „kieferorthopädische Behandlung“ dagegen hatte einen signifikanten Einfluss auf die MLQ in dieser Altersgruppe (p <0,001; t-Test). Bei Probanden aus der Allgemeinbevölkerung wiesen 50% der Befragten einen CPQ-G11–14 Summenwert von ≤7 auf. Entsprechende Werte für Probanden mit kieferorthopädischer Behandlung lagen bei ≤13, für Probanden ohne kieferorthopädischer Behandlung bei ≤5 Punkten des Summenwertes. 90% aller befragten Probanden wiesen Summenwerte ≤32 Einheiten auf. Derselbe Prozentsatz von Probanden mit kieferorthopädischer Behandlung hatte einen Wert ≤50 sowie von ≤21 für Probanden ohne kieferorthopädische Behandlung. Die am häufigsten berichteten Probleme von Kindern in dieser Altersgruppe, die mit „oft“ und „sehr oft“ beantwortet wurden, waren (unangenehm) „durch Mund geatmet“ (13,0%) und „wunde Stellen im Mund“ (4,4%) sowie „schlechter Atem“ (4,3%).

Schlussfolgerung

Die deutschlandweite Normierung der deutschen Version des Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11–14) zeigt eine wesentliche Beeinträchtigung der wahrgenommenen Mundgesundheit 11- bis 14-jähriger Kinder. Die abgeleiteten Normwerte dienen zur Interpretation des Niveaus eingeschränkter mundgesundheitsbezogener Lebensqualität bei Kindern in zukünftigen Untersuchungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Barbosa TS, Gaviao MB (2008) Oral health-related quality of life in children: part I. How well do children know themselves? A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg 6:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F et al (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25:3186–3191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bekes K, John MT, Zyriax R et al (2011) The German version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G11–14): translation process, reliability, and validity in the general population. Clin Oral Investig DOI 10.1007/s00784-010-0496-5

  4. Bowling A, Bond M, Jenkinson C et al (1999) Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. J Public Health Med 21:255–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown A, Al-Khayal Z (2006) Validity and reliability of the Arabic translation of the child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaire (CPQ11–14) in Saudi Arabia. Int J Paediatr Dent 16:405–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Hogrefe, Goettingen

  7. Chen M, Wang DW, Wu LP (2010) Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Chinese patients. Angle Orthod 80:49–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fayers PM (2001) Interpreting quality of life data: population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer 37:1331–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feu D, Oliveira BH de, Oliveira Almeida MA de et al (2010) Oral health-related quality of life and orthodontic treatment seeking. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:152–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandek B, Ware JE Jr (1998) Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 51:953–959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM et al (2008) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11–14 (CPQ11–14) for the Brazilian Portuguese language. Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. John MT, Micheelis W (2003) Mundgesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität in der Bevölkerung: Grundlagen und Ergebnisse des Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) aus einer repräsentativen Stichprobe in Deutschland. IDZ-Information, Köln 1:1–28

  13. John MT, Micheelis W, Biffar R (2004) Reference values in oral health-related quality of life for the abbreviated version of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 114:784–791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. John MT, Patrick DL, Slade GD (2002) The German version of the Oral Health Impact Profile – translation and psychometric properties. Eur J Oral Sci 110:425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. John MT, Slade GD, Szentpetery A et al (2004) Oral health-related quality of life in patients treated with fixed, removable, and complete dentures 1 month and 6 to 12 months after treatment. Int J Prosthodont 17:503–511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M et al (2002) Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res 81:459–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krey KF, Hirsch C (2011) Frequency of orthodontic treatment in German children and adolescents: influence of age, gender, and socio-economic status. Eur J Orthod. published online April 12, doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq155

  18. Liu Z, McGrath C, Hagg U (2011) Changes in oral health-related quality of life during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy: An 18-month prospective longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:214–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loge JH, Kaasa S (1998) Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med Suppl 26:250–258

    Google Scholar 

  20. McGrath C, Bedi R (1999) The value and use of ‘quality of life’ measures in the primary dental care setting. Prim Dent Care 6:53–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McGrath C, Bedi R (2002) Population based norming of the UK oral health related quality of life measure (OHQoL-UK). Br Dent J 193:521–524; discussion 517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IR (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

  23. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Streiner DL, Norman GR (2003) Health measurement scales. A practical guide for their development and use. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  25. Ware JE, Keller SD (1996) Interpreting general health measures. In: Spiker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 445–460

  26. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M et al (1993) SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston 1–3:22

  27. Weidner K, Richter J, Bittner A et al (2009) A German survey of subjective gynaecological complaints. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 59:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wogelius P, Gjorup H, Haubek D et al (2009) Development of Danish version of child oral-health-related quality of life questionnaires (CPQ8–10 and CPQ11–14). BMC Oral Health 9:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The study was supported by GABA International.

The authors wish to thank Ms Annett Schrock (University of Leipzig) for her help in data administration and analysis.

Conflict of interest

The corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Bekes.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bekes, K., John, M., Schaller, H. et al. The German version of the child perceptions questionnaire on oral health-related quality of life (CPQ-G11–14). J Orofac Orthop 72, 223–233 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0027-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0027-2

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation