Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fast-track-Programme versus traditionelle Behandlung nach Operation in der kolorektalen Chirurgie

Metaanalyse von randomisierten kontrollierten Studien

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery

A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Hardt J, Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T et al (2013) The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1019–1026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

S. Petersen gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Zentrum für minimalinvasive und onkologische Chirurgie, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 1, 22763, Hamburg, Deutschland

    S. Petersen

Authors
  1. S. Petersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Petersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersen, S. Fast-track-Programme versus traditionelle Behandlung nach Operation in der kolorektalen Chirurgie. coloproctology 36, 120–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-014-0442-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-014-0442-0

Search

Navigation