Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biofeedback bei Stuhlinkontinenz

Eine randomisierte Studie zum Vergleich unterschiedlicher Therapieregimen

Biofeedback for fecal incontinence

A randomized study comparing exercise regimens

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Norton C, Cody JD, Hosker G (2006) Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD002111

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norton C, Gibbs A, Kamm MA (2006) Randomized, controlled trial of anal electrical stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 49:190–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayden DM, Weiss EG (2011) Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24:64–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y et al (2009) Randomized controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to pelvic floor exercises for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1730–1737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwandner T, König IR et al (2010) Triple target treatment (3T) is more effective than biofeedback alone for anal incontinence: the 3T-AI study. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1007–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Keine Angaben.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kolbert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolbert, G. Biofeedback bei Stuhlinkontinenz. coloproctology 34, 373–375 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-012-0310-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-012-0310-8

Navigation