Literatur
Hallan RI et al (1989) Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76:973
Jones OM et al (2005) Digital rectal examination of sphincter pressures in chronic anal fissure is unreliable. Dis Colon Rectum 48:349
Pehl C et al (2007) Empfehlungen zur anorektalen Manometrie im Erwachsenenalter. Z Gastroenterol 45:397
Tantiphlachiva K et al (2010) Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:955
Eckardt VF et al (1993) How reliable is digital examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 8:95
Favetta U et al (1996) Clinical, manometric and sonographic assessment of the anal sphincters: a comparative prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:163
Herbst F et al (1994) Alteration of maximum anal resting pressure by digital rectal examination prior to manoemtry: analysis of agreement between repeat measurements. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:207
Kaushal JN et al (1991) Validation of the digital rectal examination as an estimate of anal sphincter squeeze pressure. Am J Gastroenterol 86:886
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furtwängler, A. Der digitale anorektale klinische Punktescore (DRESS). coloproctology 33, 373–374 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-011-0230-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-011-0230-z