Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reizdarmsyndrom

Unter Berücksichtigung der neuen Leitlinie 2011

Irritable bowel syndrome

Considering the new 2011 guideline

  • CME Weiterbildung · Zertifizierte Fortbildung
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Das Reizdarmsyndrom (RDS) ist eine in der Praxis häufig vorkommende komplexe funktionelle Gesundheitsstörung. Hauptsymptome der Patienten sind Schmerzen, Blähungen, Obstipation, Diarrhö, Meteorismus und abdominale Distension. Die Diagnose erfolgt durch Ausschluss relevanter Differenzialdiagnosen. Man unterscheidet Patienten mit Obstipationsprädominanz, Diarrhöprädominanz und wechselndem/gemischtem Stuhlverhalten. In der Entstehung des RDS werden vielfältige Pathomechanismen diskutiert. Aufgrund der Heterogenität gibt es keine Standardtherapie. Die Behandlung erfolgt stets symptomorientiert. Erfolge bei der Behandlung des RDS konnten mit Ballaststoffen, Laxanzien, Spasmolytika, Antidepressiva, Hypno-/Psychotherapie sowie Antibiotika erzielt werden. Ebenso gelten Probiotika zunehmend als ein sinnvoller therapeutischer Ansatz, wobei hier Wirkungen stammspezifisch und individuell sind und sich somit nicht generalisieren lassen.

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) represents a common, functional gastrointestinal disorder. Predominant symptoms are pain, flatulence, constipation, diarrhea, meteorism and abdominal distension. The diagnosis is made by exclusion of relevant differential diagnoses. Patients are categorized according to defecation problems into diarrhea predominant, constipation predominant and alternating mixed stool behavior. To date, several pathomechanisms of IBS are under discussion. Owing to its heterogeneity, no standard therapy is available and current therapeutic approaches focus on the main symptoms. Dietary fibre, laxatives, spasmolytics, antidepressants, hypnotherapy/psychotherapy and also antibiotics have been reported to be beneficial in the treatment of IBS. Recently, evidence has accumulated that probiotics represent a useful therapeutic approach in the treatment of IBS although effects are strain-specific and individual and cannot be generally assigned to all patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Layer P et al (2011) Irritable bowel syndrome: German consensus guidelines on definition, pathophysiology and management. Z Gastroenterol 49(2):237–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spiller R et al (2007) Guidelines on the irritable bowel syndrome: mechanisms and practical management. Gut 56(12):1770–1798

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Whitehead WE et al (1996) Impact of irritable bowel syndrome on quality of life. Dig Dis Sci 41(11):2248–2253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gralnek IM et al (2000) The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life. Gastroenterology 119(3):654–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand: Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. Hogrefe Verlag, Göttingen

  6. Spiller R, Garsed K (2009) Postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 136(6):1979–1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwille-Kiuntke J et al (2011) Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome–a review of the literature. Z Gastroenterol 49(8):997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohman L, Simren M (2010) Pathogenesis of IBS: role of inflammation, immunity and neuroimmune interactions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7(3):163–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drossman DA et al (1982) Bowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care. Use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunction. Gastroenterology 83(3):529–534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer EA (2001) Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(8):453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Larsson MB et al (2011) Brain responses to expectation and delivery of a visceral stimulus in IBS reflect visceral sensitivity thresholds. Gastroenterology

  12. Tillisch K, Mayer EA, Labus JS (2011) Quantitative meta-analysis identifies brain regions activated during rectal distension in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 140(1):91–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krogius-Kurikka L et al (2009) Microbial community analysis reveals high level phylogenetic alterations in the overall gastrointestinal microbiota of diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome sufferers. BMC Gastroenterol 9:95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito YA (2011) The role of genetics in IBS. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 40(1):45–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koloski NA, Talley NJ, Boyce PM (2000) The impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on quality of life. Am J Gastroenterol 95(1):67–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aiarzaguena JM et al (2007) A randomized controlled clinical trial of a psychosocial and communication intervention carried out by GPs for patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Psychol Med 37(2):283–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bijkerk CJ et al (2004) Systematic review: the role of different types of fibre in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19(3):245–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramkumar D, Rao SS (2005) Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapies for chronic constipation: systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 100(4):936–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pimentel M et al (2006) Neomycin improves constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a fashion that is dependent on the presence of methane gas: subanalysis of a double-blind randomized controlled study. Dig Dis Sci 51(8):1297–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McFarland LV, Dublin S (2008) Meta-analysis of probiotics for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 14(17):2650–2661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Madisch A et al (2004) Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with herbal preparations: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19(3):271–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brenner DM et al (2009) The utility of probiotics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 104(4):1033–49, quiz 1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andresen V et al (2011) Reizdarmsyndrom – die wichtigsten Empfehlungen. Dtsch Arztebl 108(44):751–760

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor weist für sich und seine Koautoren auf folgende Beziehungen hin: Prof. Dr. H. Krammer erhielt Honorar für Vorträge oder Beratung oder Studien von folgenden Firmen: Ardeypharm, Danone, Yakult, Falk Foundation, Shire. Markus Bluhm: keine Interessenkonflikte. PD Dr. Beate Niesler erhielt ein Honorar für die Beratung der Firma HEEL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Krammer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krammer, H., Bluhm, M. & Niesler, B. Reizdarmsyndrom. coloproctology 34, 157–166 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-011-0218-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-011-0218-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation