Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hämorrhoidektomie mit LigaSureTM vs. konventionelle Exzisionstechniken

Eine Metaanalyse randomisierter kontrollierter Studien

Haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSureTM vs. conventional excisional techniques

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
coloproctology Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Fritsch M, Duschka L, Müller-Lobeck H, Kraemer M (2008) LigaSure® versus BiClamp®: ein Erfahrungsbericht zum Vergleich neuerer Diathermieverfahren bei Hämorrhoidektomien. Coloproctology 30(6):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. End- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Mannheim, Bismarckplatz 1, 68165, Mannheim, Deutschland

    A.K. Joos

Authors
  1. A.K. Joos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.K. Joos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joos, A. Hämorrhoidektomie mit LigaSureTM vs. konventionelle Exzisionstechniken. coloproctology 33, 193–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-011-0186-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00053-011-0186-z

Search

Navigation