Chemoecology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 193–199

Correlates of perfume load in male orchid bees

  • T. Eltz
  • C. Bause
  • K. Hund
  • J. J. G. Quezada-Euan
  • T. Pokorny
Research Paper

Abstract

Male neotropical orchid bees collect volatile substances from their environment and compose complex, species-specific odour blends in leg pouches. These perfumes are accumulated by the males over time and are exposed during pre-mating display. It has been hypothesized that perfumes are indicators of male genotypic quality and that females chose mates by the quality or intensity of their odour. Because direct experimental proof is lacking, we investigated whether the amount or complexity of male perfumes is related to male (1) size, (2) fluctuating (left–right) asymmetry, or (3) age, traits that are known to be sexually selected in other animals. We measured left and right forewings (cell node distances for 1 and 2, wing wear for 3) of Euglossa dilemma and Euglossa viridissima collected during dry and rainy seasons on the Yucatán peninsula, Mexico (total N = 768). Wing size was not related to the quantity or the complexity of perfume extracts in either species after excluding the effect of season, which positively affected both size and perfume load in E. dilemma. Wing asymmetry had also no effect, except in rainy season E. viridissima, where it was positively (not negatively) correlated with the quantity of perfume. Wing wear, an established age indicator of orchid bees, had the only consistent overall effect, being positively correlated with perfume amount and complexity in both species. This is in agreement with the idea that perfumes are an honest indicator of male survival capacity.

Keywords

Fragrances Fitness indicator Age indicator Sexual selection Female choice Male size Fluctuating asymmetry Wing wear 

References

  1. Alcock J (1996) The relation between male body size, fighting, and mating success in Dawson’s burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni (Apidae, Apinae, Anthophorini). J Zool 239:663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin MR, Bussiere LF, Goulson D (2012) Effects of male age and size on mating success in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. J Insect Behav 25:362–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer CR, Zajitschek F, Sakaluk SK, Royle NJ, Hunt J (2012) Sexual selection affects the evolution of lifespan and ageing in the decorated cricket Gryllodes sigillatus. Evolution 66:3088–3100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonduriansky R, Maklakov A, Zajitschek F, Brooks R (2008) Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and life span. Funct Ecol 22:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks R, Kemp DJ (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? TREE 16:308–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dressler RL (1982) Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini). Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13:373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eltz T (1997) Zur Duftstoffbiologie neotropischer Prachtbienen (Apidae: Euglossini). Diplomarbeit, Universität Würzburg, Germany, pp 104Google Scholar
  9. Eltz T, Whitten WM, Roubik DW, Linsenmair KE (1999) Fragrance collection, storage, and accumulation by individual male orchid bees. J Chem Ecol 25:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eltz T, Roubik DW, Whitten WM (2003) Fragrances, male display and mating behaviour of Euglossa hemichlora: a flight cage experiment. Phys Entomol 28:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eltz T, Roubik DW, Lunau K (2005a) Experience-dependent choices ensure species-specific fragrance accumulation in male orchid bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eltz T, Sager A, Lunau K (2005b) Juggling with volatiles: exposure of perfumes by displaying male orchid bees. J Comp Physiol A 191:575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eltz T et al (2007) Enfleurage, lipid recycling and the origin of perfume collection in orchid bees. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 274:2843–2848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedl TWP, Klump GM (2005) Sexual selection in the lek-breeding European treefrog: body size, chorus attendance, random mating and good genes. Anim Behav 70:1141–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaffe R, Moritz RFA (2010) Mating flights select for symmetry in honeybee drones (Apis mellifera). Naturwissenschaften 97:337–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim JY, Thorp RW (2001) Maternal investment and size-number trade-off in a bee, Megachile apicalis, in seasonal environments. Oecologia 126:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manning JT (1985) Choosy females and correlates of male age. J Theor Biol 116:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May-Itzá WdJ, Medina Medina LA, Medina S, Paxton RJ, Quezada-Euán JJG (2014) Seasonal nest characteristics of a facultatively social orchid bee, Euglossa viridissima, in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Insectes Soc 61:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moller AP, Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 266:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peruquetti RC (2003) Variação do tamanho corporal de machos de Eulaema nigrita Lepeletier (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini). Resposta materna à flutuação de recursos? [Body size variation in males of Eulaema nigrita Lepeletier (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini). Maternal response to resource fluctuation?]. Rev Bras Zool 20:207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pokorny T et al (2013) Acquisition of species-specific perfume blends: influence of habitat-dependent compound availability on odour choices of male orchid bees (Euglossa spp.). Oecologia 172:417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roulston TH, Cane JH (2000) The effect of diet breadth and nesting ecology on body size variation in bees (Apiformes). J Kansas Entomol Soc 73:129–142Google Scholar
  23. Schemske DW, Lande R (1984) Fragrance collection and territorial display by male orchid bees. Anim Behav 32:935–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Severinghaus LL, Kurtak BH, Eickwort GC (1981) The reproductive behavior of Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the significance of size for territorial males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Silva MC, Lomonaco C, Augusto SC, Kerr WE (2009) Climatic and anthropic influence on size and fluctuating asymmetry of Euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a semideciduous seasonal forest reserve. Genet Mol Res 8:730–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone GN, Loder PMJ, Blackburn TM (1995) Foraging and courtship behavior in males of the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes (Hymenoptera, Anthophoridae): thermal physiology and the roles of body-size. Ecol Entomol 20:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Strohm E (2000) Factors affecting body size and fat content in a digger wasp. Oecologia 123:184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tepedino VJ, Thompson R, Torchio PF (1984) Heritability for size in the Megachilid bee Osmia lignaria propinqua Cresson. Apidologie 15:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Villalobos EM, Shelly TE (1991) Correlates of male mating success in two species of Anthidium bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Villanueva RA, Quezada-Euan JJG, Eltz T (2013) Pollen diets of two sibling orchid bee species, Euglossa, in Yucatán, southern Mexico. Apidologie 44:440–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vogel S (1966) Parfümsammelnde Bienen als Bestäuber von Orchidaceen und Gloxinia. Österr Bot Z 113:302–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watson PJ, Thornhill R (1994) Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. TREE 9:21–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitten WM, Young AM, Stern DL (1993) Nonfloral sources of chemicals that attract male euglossine bees (Apidae: Euglossini). J Chem Ecol 19:3017–3027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zimmermann Y, Ramírez SR, Eltz T (2009) Chemical niche differentiation among sympatric species of orchid bees. Ecology 90:2994–3008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Eltz
    • 1
  • C. Bause
    • 1
  • K. Hund
    • 1
  • J. J. G. Quezada-Euan
    • 2
  • T. Pokorny
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal Ecology, Evolution and BiodiversityRuhr University BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.Departamento de ApiculturaUniversidad Autónoma de YucatánMeridaMexico

Personalised recommendations